On 02/03/17 15:33, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.03.17 at 16:06, wrote:
>> On 02/03/17 13:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> start_svm() already runs after cpu_data[] was set up, so it shouldn't
>>> modify it anymore (at least not directly). Constify the involved
>>> pointers.
>>>
>>> Furthermore LMSLE fe
>>> On 02.03.17 at 16:06, wrote:
> On 02/03/17 13:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> start_svm() already runs after cpu_data[] was set up, so it shouldn't
>> modify it anymore (at least not directly). Constify the involved
>> pointers.
>>
>> Furthermore LMSLE feature detection was broken by 566ddbe833 ("x8
>>> On 02.03.17 at 16:19, wrote:
> On 03/02/2017 10:02 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 02.03.17 at 15:58, wrote:
>>> On 03/02/2017 08:08 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
start_svm() already runs after cpu_data[] was set up, so it shouldn't
modify it anymore (at least not directly). Constify the i
On 02/03/17 13:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
> start_svm() already runs after cpu_data[] was set up, so it shouldn't
> modify it anymore (at least not directly). Constify the involved
> pointers.
>
> Furthermore LMSLE feature detection was broken by 566ddbe833 ("x86:
> Fail CPU bringup cleanly if it canno
On 03/02/2017 10:02 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.03.17 at 15:58, wrote:
>> On 03/02/2017 08:08 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> start_svm() already runs after cpu_data[] was set up, so it shouldn't
>>> modify it anymore (at least not directly). Constify the involved
>>> pointers.
>>>
>>> Furthermor
>>> On 02.03.17 at 15:58, wrote:
> On 03/02/2017 08:08 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> start_svm() already runs after cpu_data[] was set up, so it shouldn't
>> modify it anymore (at least not directly). Constify the involved
>> pointers.
>>
>> Furthermore LMSLE feature detection was broken by 566ddbe833
On 03/02/2017 08:08 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> start_svm() already runs after cpu_data[] was set up, so it shouldn't
> modify it anymore (at least not directly). Constify the involved
> pointers.
>
> Furthermore LMSLE feature detection was broken by 566ddbe833 ("x86:
> Fail CPU bringup cleanly if it
start_svm() already runs after cpu_data[] was set up, so it shouldn't
modify it anymore (at least not directly). Constify the involved
pointers.
Furthermore LMSLE feature detection was broken by 566ddbe833 ("x86:
Fail CPU bringup cleanly if it cannot initialise HVM"), as Andrew
Cooper has pointed
