>>> On 02.03.17 at 16:06, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 02/03/17 13:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> start_svm() already runs after cpu_data[] was set up, so it shouldn't
>> modify it anymore (at least not directly). Constify the involved
>> pointers.
>>
>> Furthermore LMSLE feature detection was broken by 566ddbe833 ("x86:
>> Fail CPU bringup cleanly if it cannot initialise HVM"), as Andrew
>> Cooper has pointed out: c couldn't possibly equal &boot_cpu_data
>> anymore.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
>
> I was hoping to avoid fixing LMSLE this until I had enough CPUID
> infrastructure in place to make it migration safe.
>
> OTOH, I can't really object to the patch either.
>
> Would you mind if we #if 0'd the LMSLE bit for now, to avoid introducing
> a window where it definitely isn't migration safe?
I can do this, albeit a little reluctantly. I'd prefer "if ( 0 && ...)"
though, to keep the code getting seen by the parser.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
