Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [PATCH] libxc: Fix CID 1351225 resource leak"):
> That being said, this case is very simple, so I'll leave it to the
> tools maintainers to tell whether they want something like what I
> described above in place or not.
I agree that what you suggest would be better. Th
On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 10:28 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> Hi Harmandeep,
>
> Thanks for this patch.
>
> On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 14:37 +0530, Harmandeep Kaur wrote:
> >
> In general, I think it would be best if the subject is a bit more
> "explicative", and if you add a few words of changelog, her
Hi Harmandeep,
Thanks for this patch.
On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 14:37 +0530, Harmandeep Kaur wrote:
>
In general, I think it would be best if the subject is a bit more
"explicative", and if you add a few words of changelog, here, above the
S-o-b.
In this case, this could be something like this.
Sub
Signed-off-by: Harmandeep Kaur
---
tools/libxc/xc_offline_page.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_offline_page.c b/tools/libxc/xc_offline_page.c
index bc91d51..3248a34 100644
--- a/tools/libxc/xc_offline_page.c
+++ b/tools/libxc/xc_offline_page.c
