On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 01:26:33PM +, Lars Kurth wrote:
>
>
> On 04/08/2016 07:52, "Tian, Kevin" wrote:
>
> >> From: Boris Ostrovsky
> >> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 9:57 PM
> >> On 07/18/2016 10:01 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >> > ACPI builder is currently distributed under GPLv2 licens
>>> On 26.08.16 at 15:08, wrote:
> On 08/26/2016 08:51 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 26.08.16 at 14:13, wrote:
>>> On 08/26/2016 02:54 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 18.07.16 at 16:01, wrote:
> ACPI builder is currently distributed under GPLv2 license.
>
> We plan to make the bu
On 26/08/2016 08:13, "Boris Ostrovsky" wrote:
>On 08/26/2016 02:54 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 18.07.16 at 16:01, wrote:
>>> ACPI builder is currently distributed under GPLv2 license.
>>>
>>> We plan to make the builder available to components other
>>> than the hvmloader (which is also GP
On 04/08/2016 07:52, "Tian, Kevin" wrote:
>> From: Boris Ostrovsky
>> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 9:57 PM
>> On 07/18/2016 10:01 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> > ACPI builder is currently distributed under GPLv2 license.
>> >
>> > We plan to make the builder available to components other
>> >
On 08/26/2016 08:51 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 26.08.16 at 14:13, wrote:
>> On 08/26/2016 02:54 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 18.07.16 at 16:01, wrote:
ACPI builder is currently distributed under GPLv2 license.
We plan to make the builder available to components other
t
>>> On 26.08.16 at 14:13, wrote:
> On 08/26/2016 02:54 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 18.07.16 at 16:01, wrote:
>>> ACPI builder is currently distributed under GPLv2 license.
>>>
>>> We plan to make the builder available to components other
>>> than the hvmloader (which is also GPLv2). Some of t
On 08/26/2016 02:54 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.07.16 at 16:01, wrote:
>> ACPI builder is currently distributed under GPLv2 license.
>>
>> We plan to make the builder available to components other
>> than the hvmloader (which is also GPLv2). Some of these
>> components (such as libxl) may be
>>> On 18.07.16 at 16:01, wrote:
> ACPI builder is currently distributed under GPLv2 license.
>
> We plan to make the builder available to components other
> than the hvmloader (which is also GPLv2). Some of these
> components (such as libxl) may be distributed under LGPL-2.1
> so that they can b
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 08:57:40AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 08/01/2016 09:56 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > Simon, Keir,
>
>
> Simon, ping?
Sorry, I didn't see this until now.
Acked-by: Simon Horman
> > In case you didn't realize --- this needs your ACK.
> >
> > Jan, now that I
On 08/01/2016 09:56 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Simon, Keir,
Simon, ping?
>
>
> In case you didn't realize --- this needs your ACK.
>
> Jan, now that I checked the logs more carefully, you are the only one
> from Suse/Novell who touched these files so your ACK is needed as well.
>
> Thanks.
>
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] acpi: Re-license ACPI builder files from.eml
Subject:
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] acpi: Re-license ACPI builder files from GPLv2
to LGPLv2.1
From:
"Tian, Kevin" mailto:kevin.t...@intel.com>>
Date:
Thu, 4 Aug 2016 06:52:34 +
To:
Boris Ostrovsky mai
> From: Boris Ostrovsky
> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 9:57 PM
> On 07/18/2016 10:01 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > ACPI builder is currently distributed under GPLv2 license.
> >
> > We plan to make the builder available to components other
> > than the hvmloader (which is also GPLv2). Some of the
>>> On 01.08.16 at 15:56, wrote:
> Jan, now that I checked the logs more carefully, you are the only one
> from Suse/Novell who touched these files so your ACK is needed as well.
Acked-by: Jan Beulich
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.or
Simon, Keir,
In case you didn't realize --- this needs your ACK.
Jan, now that I checked the logs more carefully, you are the only one
from Suse/Novell who touched these files so your ACK is needed as well.
Thanks.
-boris
On 07/18/2016 10:01 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> ACPI builder is curren
Stefan Berger writes:
> Daniel Kiper wrote on 07/19/2016 11:00:04 AM:
>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: Re-license ACPI builder files from GPLv2
>> to LGPLv2.1
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:01:27AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> > ACPI builder is currently distributed under GPLv2 license.
Daniel Kiper wrote on 07/19/2016 11:00:04 AM:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: Re-license ACPI builder files from GPLv2
> to LGPLv2.1
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:01:27AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > ACPI builder is currently distributed under GPLv2 license.
> >
> > We plan to make the build
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:01:27AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> ACPI builder is currently distributed under GPLv2 license.
>
> We plan to make the builder available to components other
> than the hvmloader (which is also GPLv2). Some of these
> components (such as libxl) may be distributed under
ACPI builder is currently distributed under GPLv2 license.
We plan to make the builder available to components other
than the hvmloader (which is also GPLv2). Some of these
components (such as libxl) may be distributed under LGPL-2.1
so that they can be used by non-GPLv2 callers. But this
will no
18 matches
Mail list logo
