>>> On 26.08.16 at 14:13, <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com> wrote: > On 08/26/2016 02:54 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 18.07.16 at 16:01, <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com> wrote: >>> ACPI builder is currently distributed under GPLv2 license. >>> >>> We plan to make the builder available to components other >>> than the hvmloader (which is also GPLv2). Some of these >>> components (such as libxl) may be distributed under LGPL-2.1 >>> so that they can be used by non-GPLv2 callers. But this >>> will not be possible if we incorporate the ACPI builder in >>> those other components. >>> >>> To avoid this problem we are relicensing sources in ACPI >>> bulder directory to the Lesser GNU Public License (LGPL) >>> version 2.1 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com> >>> CC: Kouya Shimura <ko...@jp.fujitsu.com> >>> CC: Daniel Kiper <dki...@net-space.pl> >>> CC: Stefan Berger <stef...@us.ibm.com> >>> CC: Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au> >>> CC: Keir Fraser <k...@xen.org> >>> CC: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> >>> CC: Lars Kurth <lars.ku...@citrix.com> >> Ian, >> >> I think all required acks are in place now (just went through the >> original thread again), but I think before committing this another >> pair of eyes double checking would not hurt. Could I ask you to >> do that? > > We are still missing Citrix and, ahem, Oracle. For the latter we are > waiting for approval from our legal and it's going rather slow (Konrad > pinged them yesterday)
Okay, I wrongly thought the Citrix part was already taken care of. But how can Oracle be still pending when the patch has your S-o-b? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
