On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 17:20 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 1/4] Database locking: Perl: Retry
> all deadlocks in PostgreSQL"):
> > The Massachusetts instance is currently broken because the ownerdaemon
> > is broken. So I am going to update the owner and queue
On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 12:01 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 11:48 +0800, Robert Hu wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 01:16 +, osstest service owner wrote:
> > > flight 65633 linux-3.14 real [real]
> > > http://logs.test-lab.xenpro
On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 09:38 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 10:30 +0800, Robert Hu wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 12:01 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 11:48 +0800, Robert Hu wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 01:16 +000
On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 12:01 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 11:48 +0800, Robert Hu wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 01:16 +, osstest service owner wrote:
> > > flight 65633 linux-3.14 real [real]
> > > http://logs.test-lab.xenpro
On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 10:29 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 08:06 +, Hu, Robert wrote:
> > >
> > [...]
>
> Please trim your quotes.
>
> > For your failure, as Kevin mentioned in other mail, we will find someone
> > to look into.
> > Would you find out the detailed log of '
On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 01:16 +, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 65633 linux-3.14 real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65633/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-amd64-i386-rumpus
On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 10:29 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 08:06 +, Hu, Robert wrote:
> > >
> > [...]
>
> Please trim your quotes.
>
> > For your failure, as Kevin mentioned in other mail, we will find someone
> > to look into.
> > Would you find out the detailed log of '
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 16:15 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Robert Hu writes ("Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 3/4] sg-run-job: Break out
> per-host-prep and per-host-finish"):
> > On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 17:36 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > -per-host-ts . =(*)
On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 17:36 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Provides nested-layer-descend, which can be called in an individual
> test job at the appropriate point (after the L1 has been set up).
>
> The inner host is a guest of the outer host; powering it off means
> destroying it. Putting the power
On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 17:36 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> No functional change.
>
> We now call the per-host-ts finish steps unconditionally, rather than
> only if !$need_build_host, per-host-ts is (complicated) no-op if
> $need_build_host, since in that case $need_xen_hosts is {}.
>
> Signed-off-b
On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 17:36 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I think it would be best if I proposed some code to you. I will get
> > back to you with a suggestion.
>
> Here is the result. Please let me know what you think.
>
> NB that this is an RFC and I have NOT EXECUTED IT. It is ea
On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 17:36 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I think it would be best if I proposed some code to you. I will get
> > back to you with a suggestion.
>
> Here is the result. Please let me know what you think.
>
> NB that this is an RFC and I have NOT EXECUTED IT. It is ea
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 16:28 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("RE: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH v11 6/7] Compose the main
> recipe of nested test job"):
> > Thinking about this leads me to ask another question. Suppose that a
> > bug causes the l1 to lock up completely. ts-logs-capture wi
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 16:27 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Pang, LongtaoX writes ("RE: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH v11 6/7] Compose the main
> recipe of nested test job"):
> > > From: Ian Jackson [mailto:ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com]
> ...
> > > leak-check compares the set of objects present at the `leak-chec
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 09:44 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 11:42 +0800, Robert Hu wrote:
> > Hi Ian J., because nested Xen isn't that matured at present; it is
> > currently 'tech preview' phase. We now just add some sanity test case to
> >
On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 16:19 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Pang, LongtaoX writes ("RE: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH v11 6/7] Compose the main
> recipe of nested test job"):
> ...
>
> (Ian C has answered some of your comments. On the others:)
>
> > > I think you probably want to run leak-check on the L1.
On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 09:37 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 11:17 +0800, Robert Hu wrote:
>
> > > Unless I'm mistaken, the MenuEntryPath of a $submenu is never used ?
> > > Not setting it would avoid (a) a need to rewrap and (b) me complaining
>
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 14:30 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> longtao.pang writes ("[OSSTEST Nested PATCH v11 2/7] Parsing grub which has
> 'submenu' primitive"):
> > Now auto-gen kernel grub2 config file's boot menu entries can have
> > 2-level hierarchy, containing 'submenu' primitive, which is compri
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 11:26 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 04:49 +, osstest service user wrote:
> > flight 57401 osstest real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/57401/
> >
> > Failures :-/ but no regressions.
>
> Lontao, Robert,
>
> The grub relat
On Sun, 2015-05-24 at 14:55 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Longtao & Robert,
>
> FYI This pass pushed the non-grub bits of the part of the series which I
> applied on Friday into the production instance.
Thanks Ian.
We're to reassemble and send v11 patches comprised of previous 01/09,
02/09, 06/09,
On Mon, 2015-05-25 at 10:25 +0800, Robert Hu wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-05-24 at 14:53 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 16:53 +0800, Robert Hu wrote:
> > > > > +$#offsets = $#offsets-1;
> > > > > +$offset
On Sun, 2015-05-24 at 14:53 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 16:53 +0800, Robert Hu wrote:
> > > > +$#offsets = $#offsets-1;
> > > > +$offsets[$#offsets]++;
> > may consider 'pop/push' ope
On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 15:21 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 14:42 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > From my particular grub.cfg. For real usage setupboot_grub2 will
> > obviously need to become cleverer to count things correctly.
>
> I've not tested extensively but the following in
On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 16:31 +0800, Robert Hu wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 15:21 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 14:42 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > From my particular grub.cfg. For real usage setupboot_grub2 will
> > > obviously need to beco
On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 15:21 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 14:42 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > From my particular grub.cfg. For real usage setupboot_grub2 will
> > obviously need to become cleverer to count things correctly.
>
> I've not tested extensively but the following in
On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 09:25 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 15:52 +0800, Robert Hu wrote:
> > On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 07:58 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 14:46 +0800, Robert Hu wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 11:35 +0800,
On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 07:58 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 14:46 +0800, Robert Hu wrote:
> > On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 11:35 +0800, Robert Hu wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 15:21 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 1
On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 11:35 +0800, Robert Hu wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 15:21 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 14:42 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > From my particular grub.cfg. For real usage setupboot_grub2 will
> > > obviously need to beco
On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 15:21 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 14:42 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > From my particular grub.cfg. For real usage setupboot_grub2 will
> > obviously need to become cleverer to count things correctly.
>
> I've not tested extensively but the following in
On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 13:30 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 12:32 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > I'm currently testing the patch below, if it works then I intend to fold
> > it into "Parsing grub which has 'submenu' primitive" and will re-push
> > the result.
>
> It didn't seem
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 16:39 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 11:36 +0800, longtao.pang wrote:
> > parsing grub which has 'submenu' primitive
> > Changes to support '/boot' leading paths of kernel, xen, in grub
> > Refactor installation of overlays for guest used
On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 10:52 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-05-14 at 11:59 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 11:36 +0800, longtao.pang wrote:
> > > Based on Ian Campbell's v6_patch [04,05,06], I create this patch
> > > to refactor installation of overlays for guest as w
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 00:34 +, Hu, Robert wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ian Jackson [mailto:ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 8:50 PM
> > To: Ian Campbell
> > Cc: Pang, LongtaoX; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; wei.l...@citrix.com; Hu, Robert
> > Subject:
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 12:05 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Pang, LongtaoX writes ("RE: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH v8 6/7] Compose
> the main recipe of nested test job"):
> > Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com]:
> > > The arguments passed to ts-* in sg-run-job should _always_ be just
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 12:23 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 12:04 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 08:38 +, Pang, LongtaoX wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com]
> > > > Sent: Tue
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 10:56 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 08:35 +, Pang, LongtaoX wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 6:40 PM
> > > To: Pang, LongtaoX
> > > Cc: xen-d
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 11:28 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 17:19 -0400, longtao.pang wrote:
> > 1. Increase disk size to accommodate to nested test requirement.
> > 2. Since 'Debain-xxx-.iso' image will be stored in rootfs of L1 guest,
> > therefore needs more disk capacity, inc
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 10:48 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 07:34:39AM +, Pang, LongtaoX wrote:
> [...]
> > > > ts-debian-install installs a L2 PV guest, which should work even
> > > > without nested HVM enabled for your L1 HVM guest. You're testing
> > > > nested HVM I think it
On Fri, 2015-01-02 at 16:47 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Boris Ostrovsky 12/26/14 9:12 PM >>>
> >> On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 02:58:06AM +, Hu, Robert wrote:
> >> Issue 1 -- detach a vt-d assigned device from guest, then reattach it to
> >> guest, will fail.
> >> http://lists.xen.org/archives
On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 11:06 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:07:37PM +0800, longtao.pang wrote:
> > From: "longtao.pang"
> >
> > This patch is used for preparing and installing L1 guest VM inside L0 system
> > on testhost machine.
> >
> > ---
> > Osstest/Debian.pm | 27
On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 09:42 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> I've not seen an individual thread on this one, so replying here.
>
> On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 10:59 +0100, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
>
> > > 6. Networking is unavailable after save&restore Windows guest
> > >http://bugzilla-archived.xenproject
41 matches
Mail list logo
