flight 116309 linux-4.9 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116309/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs.
116207
test-amd64-amd
On 10/12/2017 10:36 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Sameer,
>
> Given this is all Arm specific. I am not sure why people like Andrew, Jan
> have been added.
>
> Please use scripts/get_maintainers to find the list of maintainers per
> patches and avoid to CC all of them on each patches.
Ok.
>
>
flight 116308 linux-3.18 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116308/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 116193
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 1
flight 116302 xen-4.5-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116302/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail REGR. vs. 115226
test-amd64-i386
flight 116305 xen-4.6-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116305/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stopfail REGR. vs. 115190
Tests which are
flight 116304 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116304/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 115476
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 saveresto
flight 116299 xen-4.7-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116299/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf-xsm 6 xen-build fail in 116219 REGR. vs. 115210
Tests which are
flight 116275 seabios real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116275/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail REGR. vs. 115539
Tests which did not suc
flight 72464 distros-debian-stretch real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/72464/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-armhf-stretch-netboot-pygrub 10 debian-di-install fail like
72440
test-amd64-i386-amd
flight 116268 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116268/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win10-i386 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 115643
test-amd64-amd64-py
flight 116272 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116272/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs.
116190
Tests whic
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 11:20:06AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> +#define NATIVE_ZERO "xor " _REG_ARG1 ", " _REG_ARG1
> >>>
> >>> NATIVE_ZERO_OUT
> >>>
> >>> I guess. NATIVE_ZERO reads like the native representation of 0 :-)
> >>
> >> NATIVE_ZERO_ARG1?
> >
> > On a slight
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 72463 xen-4.9-testing real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/72463/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl7 xen-boot
flight 116261 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116261/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 116214
Tests which did no
On 17/11/17 20:42, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 08:10:13PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 17/11/17 19:07, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 10:58:24AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
Convert the hard-coded native patch assembly code strings to macros to
flight 116260 linux-next real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/116260/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 116215
test-amd64-i386-xl-x
16 matches
Mail list logo
