flight 115169 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115169/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 114507
build-i386
flight 115163 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115163/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stopfail REGR. vs. 114644
test-amd64-amd64-x
flight 115153 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115153/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail REGR. vs. 114682
Tests which did not
Hi, all,
As you may know, MBA patch set has got enough Reviewed-by/Acked-by in last week.
It is ready to be merged.
This is a feature for Skylake, Intel has launched Skylake and KVM already
supported MBA, so including it in Xen 4.10 will quickly fill this gap.
MBA missed the 4.10 feature freeze
flight 115162 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115162/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 114507
build-i386
branch xen-unstable
xenbranch xen-unstable
job build-amd64
testid xen-build
Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditional.git
Tree: qemuu git://git.qemu.org/qemu.git
Tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
*** Found and reproduced problem changeset ***
Bug is in tree: qemuu git://git.
flight 115140 linux-4.9 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115140/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail REGR. vs. 114814
Tests which are faili
> From: Gao, Chao
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 4:52 PM
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 09:57:16AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 03:50:24PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:20:06PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> >On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:02:09P
On Tue, 17 Oct 2017, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > +static unsigned int pvcalls_front_poll_passive(struct file *file,
> > + struct pvcalls_bedata *bedata,
> > + struct sock_mapping *map,
> > +
On Tue, 17 Oct 2017, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 10/06/2017 08:30 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Introduce a waitqueue to allow only one outstanding accept command at
> > any given time and to implement polling on the passive socket. Introduce
> > a flags field to keep track of in-flight accept
On Tue, 17 Oct 2017, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 10/06/2017 08:30 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Introduce a data structure named pvcalls_bedata. It contains pointers to
> > the command ring, the event channel, a list of active sockets and a list
> > of passive sockets. Lists accesses are protec
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
> Julien, do you think we need to keep a special linux tree around for Xen
> on ARM testing in OSSTest or we can start using vanilla kernel releases?
> I would love to get rid of it, if you know of any reasons why we have to
> keep it
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
> > >This is a lot of a work. It requires changes in generic parts of XEN.
> > >I fear it will be very hard to upstream such changes, because no one
> > >sees an immediate value in them. How do you think, what are my chances
> > >to upstream this?
> >
flight 115152 examine real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115152/
Failures and problems with tests :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
examine-arndale-lakeside 2 hosts-allocate broken REGR. vs. 113775
ex
flight 115132 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115132/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stopfail REGR. vs. 114644
test-amd64-amd64-x
flight 115141 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115141/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 114507
build-i386
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >>> +### x86 PV/Event Channels
> >>> +
> >>> +Limit: 131072
> >> Why do we call out event channel limits but not grant table limits?
> >> Also, why is this x86? The 2l and fifo ABIs are arch agnostic, as far
> >> as I am aware.
> > Sure, but I'm pre
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 05:59:44PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Volodymyr,
Hi Julien,
> Let me begin the e-mail with I am not totally adversed to putting the TEE
> mediator in Xen. At the moment, I am trying to understand the whole picture.
Thanks for clarification. This is really reassuring :
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:10 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 14:02 -0400, Meng Xu wrote:
>> Change repl_budget event output for xentrace formats and xenalyze
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Meng Xu
>>
> I'd say:
>
> Reviewed-by: Dario Faggioli
Hi guys,
Just a reminder, we may need this
flight 115156 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115156/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 13 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl 1
On 20/10/17 11:10, Paul Durrant wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Julien Grall [mailto:julien.gr...@linaro.org]
Sent: 20 October 2017 11:00
To: Paul Durrant ; 'Jan Beulich'
Cc: Julien Grall ; Andrew Cooper
; George Dunlap
; Ian Jackson ; Roger
Pau Monne ; Wei Liu ; Stefano
Stabellini ; x
flight 115131 linux-next real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115131/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-examine 7 reboot fail REGR. vs. 114658
test-armhf-armhf-lib
On 23/10/17 17:22, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/11/2017 06:53 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 11/09/17 18:01, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> +### x86/RAM
>>> +
>>> +Limit, x86: 16TiB
>>> +Limit, ARM32: 16GiB
>>> +Limit, ARM64: 5TiB
>>> +
>>> +[XXX: Andy to suggest what this should say for x86]
Hi all,
Xen 4.10 RC2 is tagged. You can check that out from xen.git:
git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git 4.10.0-rc2
For your convenience there is also a tarball at:
https://downloads.xenproject.org/release/xen/4.10.0-rc2/xen-4.10.0-rc2.tar.gz
And the signature is at:
https://downloads.xenproject.o
Hi,
On 23/10/17 17:32, George Dunlap wrote:
On 10/23/2017 05:28 PM, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
Recent changes in xenalyze introduced INT_MIN without also adding the
required header, fix this by adding the header.
Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné
Acked-by: George Dunlap
Release-acked-by: Julien
Hi Volodymyr,
Let me begin the e-mail with I am not totally adversed to putting the
TEE mediator in Xen. At the moment, I am trying to understand the whole
picture.
On 20/10/17 18:37, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 02:11:14PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
On 17/10/17 16:59, V
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
---
Cc: Andrew Cooper
Cc: George Dunlap
Cc: Ian Jackson
Cc: Jan Beulich
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Cc: Stefano Stabellini
Cc: Tim Deegan
Cc: Wei Liu
Cc: Julien Grall
Cc: Anthony PERARD
---
scripts/build-test.sh | 53 +
On 10/23/2017 05:28 PM, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> Recent changes in xenalyze introduced INT_MIN without also adding the
> required header, fix this by adding the header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné
Acked-by: George Dunlap
> ---
> Cc: George Dunlap
> Cc: Ian Jackson
> Cc: Wei Liu
> Cc:
Recent changes in xenalyze introduced INT_MIN without also adding the
required header, fix this by adding the header.
Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné
---
Cc: George Dunlap
Cc: Ian Jackson
Cc: Wei Liu
Cc: Julien Grall
---
This should be accepted for 4.10 because it's a build bug fix, with no
fu
On 09/11/2017 06:53 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 11/09/17 18:01, George Dunlap wrote:
>> +### x86/PV
>> +
>> +Status: Supported
>> +
>> +Traditional Xen Project PV guest
>
> What's a "Xen Project" PV guest? Just Xen here.
>
> Also, a perhaps a statement of "No hardware requirements" ?
OK.
flight 115148 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115148/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 13 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl 1
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 03:38:33PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 23/10/17 15:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 23.10.17 at 15:58, wrote:
> >> On 23/10/17 09:40, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 23.10.17 at 01:49, wrote:
> flight 115037 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xen
Hi,
On 18/10/17 17:32, Bhupinder Thakur wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> I verified this patch on qualcomm platform. It is working fine.
>
> On 18 October 2017 at 19:11, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Instead of asserting the receive interrupt (RXI) on the first character
>> in the FIFO, lets (ab)use the recei
flight 115121 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115121/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 15 guest-saverestore.2 fail REGR.
vs. 114682
test-am
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 04:09:58PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.10] scripts: add a script for
> build testing"):
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 03:50:31PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> > > FIY, I do like to put script and other files in my checkouts, the
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.10] scripts: add a script for
build testing"):
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 03:50:31PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> > FIY, I do like to put script and other files in my checkouts, the git
> > clean will remove them.
>
> I changed that to make distclean
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 03:50:31PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 02:02:53PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> > On 10/20/2017 06:32 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
> > > ---
> > > Cc: Andrew Cooper
> > > Cc: George Dunlap
> > > Cc: Ian Jackson
> > > Cc: Jan
Hi,
On 23/10/17 14:57, Andre Przywara wrote:
On 12/10/17 22:03, Manish Jaggi wrote:
It is proposed that the idrange of PCIRC and ITS group be constant for
domUs.
"constant" is a bit confusing here. Maybe "arbitrary", "from scratch" or
"independent from the actual h/w"?
I don't think we shou
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 04:32:44PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> We have decided:
>
> We will push the anoint and examine parts of this series to osstest
> pretest. (You're going to give me a suitable branch on Monday.)
> This should work because we have anointed FreeBSD builds already.
Sorry f
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 02:02:53PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/20/2017 06:32 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
> > ---
> > Cc: Andrew Cooper
> > Cc: George Dunlap
> > Cc: Ian Jackson
> > Cc: Jan Beulich
> > Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini
> > Cc: Tim
On 23/10/17 15:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.10.17 at 15:58, wrote:
>> On 23/10/17 09:40, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 23.10.17 at 01:49, wrote:
flight 115037 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115037/
Regressions :-(
Tests
>>> On 23.10.17 at 15:58, wrote:
> On 23/10/17 09:40, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 23.10.17 at 01:49, wrote:
>>> flight 115037 xen-unstable real [real]
>>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115037/
>>>
>>> Regressions :-(
>>>
>>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>>> in
Julien Grall writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 115037: regressions -
FAIL"):
> Would it be possible of a platform specific bug? The last two flights
> are failing on merlot1.
The merlots are a highly unusual AMD machines which have NUMA nodes
with no memory and seem to sometimes have
Hi Manish,
On 12/10/17 22:03, Manish Jaggi wrote:
> ACPI/IORT Support in Xen.
> --
>
> I had sent out patch series [0] to hide smmu from Dom0 IORT. Extending
> the scope
> and including all that is required to support ACPI/IORT in Xen.
> Presenting for review
>
Hi Ian,
On 19/10/17 15:57, Ian Jackson wrote:
Ross Lagerwall writes ("[PATCH v2 for-4.10 2/2] xentoolcore_restrict_all: Implement
for libxenevtchn"):
Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall
---
Changed in v2:
* Keep warning about DoS and resource exhaustion being a possibility.
Acked-by: Ian Jackson
Hi,
On 20/10/17 15:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.10.17 at 15:23, wrote:
On 20/10/17 12:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.10.17 at 02:35, wrote:
pt_update_irq() is expected to return the vector number of periodic
timer interrupt, which should be set in vIRR of vlapic or in PIR.
Otherwise it would
+ Andrew
Hi,
On 23/10/17 09:40, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.10.17 at 01:49, wrote:
flight 115037 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115037/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-
Hi,
On 20/10/17 12:10, Wei Liu wrote:
The new changeset contains the new console.h fix in xen.git.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
---
Cc: Julien Grall
This is rather low risk because stubdom build in xen.git uses xen
headers directly.
I just don't want to ship a version of xen which points to a bug
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 02:04:58PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.10] libxl: annotate s to be
> nonnull in libxl__enum_from_string"):
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 01:32:50PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > I would be ok with that. Wei do you have any opin
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.10] libxl: annotate s to be
nonnull in libxl__enum_from_string"):
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 01:32:50PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > I would be ok with that. Wei do you have any opinion?
>
> Sure this is a simple enough patch. We should preferably tu
On 10/20/2017 06:32 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
> ---
> Cc: Andrew Cooper
> Cc: George Dunlap
> Cc: Ian Jackson
> Cc: Jan Beulich
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini
> Cc: Tim Deegan
> Cc: Wei Liu
> Cc: Julien Grall
>
> The risk for this is zero, hence th
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 01:32:50PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20/10/17 11:47, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Julien Grall writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.10] libxl: annotate s to
> > be nonnull in libxl__enum_from_string"):
> > > Release-acked-by: Julien Grall
> >
> > Thanks, I have
Hi,
On 20/10/17 11:47, Ian Jackson wrote:
Julien Grall writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.10] libxl: annotate s to be
nonnull in libxl__enum_from_string"):
Release-acked-by: Julien Grall
Thanks, I have applied this. Not sure whether this followup is 4.10
material, but IMO it is if we wo
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 01:07:36PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.10] scripts: add a script for build
> testing"):
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 01:02:00PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > In particular, if you:
> > > * check that the tree is not dirty
> > > * detach
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: 23 October 2017 13:18
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: Andrew Cooper ; George Dunlap
> ; Ian Jackson ; Ross
> Lagerwall ; Wei Liu ;
> Stefano Stabellini ; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Konrad
> Rzeszutek Wilk ; Tim (Xen.org)
>
On 10/23/2017 01:03 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
snip>> +/*
+ * XEN_DMOP_add_to_physmap : Sets the GPFNs at which a page range
appears in
+ * the specified guest's pseudophysical address
+ * space. Identical to XENMEM_add_to_physmap with
+ *
>>> On 23.10.17 at 14:03, wrote:
>> From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of
>> Ross Lagerwall
>> Sent: 23 October 2017 10:05
>> --- a/xen/include/public/hvm/dm_op.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/public/hvm/dm_op.h
>> @@ -368,6 +368,22 @@ struct xen_dm_op_remote_shutdown {
>>
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.10] scripts: add a script for build testing"):
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 02:24:40AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 20.10.17 at 19:32, wrote:
> > > +git rebase $BASE $TIP -x "$CMD"
> >
> > Is this quoting on $CMD really going to work right no matter what
> > the
>>> On 23.10.17 at 13:41, wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 02:24:40AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 20.10.17 at 19:32, wrote:
>> > --- /dev/null
>> > +++ b/scripts/build-test.sh
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
>> > +#!/bin/sh
>> > +
>> > +# WARNING: Always backup the branch by creating another refere
> -Original Message-
> From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of
> Ross Lagerwall
> Sent: 23 October 2017 10:05
> To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> Cc: Ross Lagerwall ; Ian Jackson
> ; Wei Liu
> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] tools: libxendevicemodel: Provide
>
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.10] scripts: add a script for build testing"):
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 01:02:00PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > In particular, if you:
> > * check that the tree is not dirty
> > * detach HEAD
>
> I think these two checks are good.
>
> > * reattach HEAD after
> -Original Message-
> From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of
> Ross Lagerwall
> Sent: 23 October 2017 10:05
> To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini ; Wei Liu
> ; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk ;
> George Dunlap ; Andrew Cooper
> ; Ian Jackson ; Tim
> (X
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 01:02:00PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.10] scripts: add a script for build
> testing"):
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 02:24:40AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > What is this startup delay intended for?
> >
> > To give user a chance to check
> -Original Message-
> From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of
> Ross Lagerwall
> Sent: 23 October 2017 10:05
> To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini ; Wei Liu
> ; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk ;
> George Dunlap ; Andrew Cooper
> ; Ian Jackson ; Tim
> (X
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.10] scripts: add a script for build testing"):
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 02:24:40AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > What is this startup delay intended for?
>
> To give user a chance to check the command -- git-rebase can be
> destructive after all.
I can't resist
flight 115129 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115129/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 114507
build-i386
> -Original Message-
> From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of
> Ross Lagerwall
> Sent: 23 October 2017 10:05
> To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini ; Wei Liu
> ; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk ;
> George Dunlap ; Andrew Cooper
> ; Ian Jackson ; Tim
> (X
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 12:30:33PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 06:32:55PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > +CMD=${3:-git clean -fdx && ./configure && make -j4}
> > +
> > +echo "Running command \"$CMD\" on every commit from $BASE to $TIP"
> > +echo -n "Starting in "
> > +
> > +fo
flight 115110 linux-4.9 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115110/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail REGR. vs. 114814
Tests which are faili
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 02:24:40AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 20.10.17 at 19:32, wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/scripts/build-test.sh
> > @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
> > +#!/bin/sh
> > +
> > +# WARNING: Always backup the branch by creating another reference to it if
> > +# you're not familiar wit
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 12:30:33PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 06:32:55PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > +CMD=${3:-git clean -fdx && ./configure && make -j4}
> > +
> > +echo "Running command \"$CMD\" on every commit from $BASE to $TIP"
> > +echo -n "Starting in "
> > +
> > +fo
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 06:32:55PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> +CMD=${3:-git clean -fdx && ./configure && make -j4}
> +
> +echo "Running command \"$CMD\" on every commit from $BASE to $TIP"
> +echo -n "Starting in "
> +
> +for i in `seq 5 -1 1`; do
> +echo -n "$i ... "
> +sleep 1
> +done
> +
I
Ross Lagerwall writes ("[PATCH v2 4/5] tools: libxendevicemodel: Provide
xendevicemodel_add_to_physmap"):
> Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall
Assuming the hypervisor parts go in:
Acked-by: Ian Jackson
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
h
Ian Jackson writes ("[PATCH v5.1 8/8] configure: do_compiler: Dump some extra
info under bash"):
> This makes it much easier to find a particular thing in config.log.
>
> The information may be lacking in other shells, resulting in harmless
> empty output. (This is why we don't use the proper ${
Hi Wei,
On 20/10/17 18:32, Wei Liu wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
---
Cc: Andrew Cooper
Cc: George Dunlap
Cc: Ian Jackson
Cc: Jan Beulich
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Cc: Stefano Stabellini
Cc: Tim Deegan
Cc: Wei Liu
Cc: Julien Grall
The risk for this is zero, hence the for-4.10 tag.
Ag
On 20/10/17 18:08, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 05:30:41PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
The coverage support in hypervisor is redone. Update the document.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
Adding Julien, although I'm not sure if doc changes also need a
release-ack.
Reviewed-by: Roger Pau
On 06/10/17 15:30, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 27/09/17 15:36, Wei Liu wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 02:02:56PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> Long ago domains to be saved were limited to 1TB size due to the
>>> migration stream v1 limitations which used a 32 bit value for the
>>> PFN an
Hi Jan,
2017-10-23 15:26 GMT+08:00 Jan Beulich :
On 22.10.17 at 13:21, wrote:
>> How about changing the policy to (c over d) && ((d over t) || (c over t))?
>> Given that (c over d) is a must, which is always checked somewhere higher
>> in the call stack as Daniel pointed out, permitting (d
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 09:57:16AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 03:50:24PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:20:06PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> >On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:02:09PM -0400, Lan Tianyu wrote:
>> >> From: Chao Gao
>> >> +}
>> >> +
Running "./xtf_runner vvmx" in L1 Xen under L0 Xen produces the
following result on H/W with VMCS shadowing:
Test: vmxon
Failure in test_vmxon_in_root_cpl0()
Expected 0x820f: VMfailValid(15) VMXON_IN_ROOT
Got 0x82004400: VMfailValid(17408)
Test result: FAILURE
Th
De-htmling...
Moving to xen-users (xen-devel to bcc)...
-
From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Berillions
Sent: 21 October 2017 17:50
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.9 is broken with last version of Win10
Hi guys,
I send you this message
Any thoughts appreciated.
On Vi, 2017-10-06 at 13:02 +0300, Alexandru Isaila wrote:
> This patch adds the hvm_save_one_cpu_ctxt() function.
> It optimizes by only pausing the vcpu on all HVMSR_PER_VCPU save
> callbacks where only data for one VCPU is required.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila
flight 72341 distros-debian-sid real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/72341/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-arm64-arm64-armhf-sid-netboot-pygrub 1 build-check(1)blocked n/a
build-arm64-pvops
flight 115087 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115087/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stopfail REGR. vs. 114644
test-amd64-amd64-x
Make it global in preparation to be called by a new dmop.
Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall
---
Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant
---
xen/common/memory.c | 5 ++---
xen/include/xen/mm.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/common/memory.c b/xen/common/memory.c
index
The recently added support for restricting QEMU prevents use of the VGA
console. This series addresses that by adding a couple of new dmops.
A corresponding patch for QEMU is needed to make use of the new dmops.
Changes in v2:
* Address Paul's comments - mainly making add_to_physmap operate on a
Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall
---
Acked-by: Ian Jackson
Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant
---
tools/libs/devicemodel/core.c | 19 +++
tools/libs/devicemodel/include/xendevicemodel.h | 14 ++
tools/libs/devicemodel/libxendevicemodel.map| 1 +
3 files c
Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall
---
Changed in v2:
* Make it operate on a range.
tools/libs/devicemodel/Makefile | 2 +-
tools/libs/devicemodel/core.c | 21 +
tools/libs/devicemodel/include/xendevicemodel.h | 15 +++
tools/libs/de
Provide XEN_DMOP_pin_memory_cacheattr to allow a deprivileged QEMU to
pin the caching type of RAM after moving the VRAM. It is equivalent to
XEN_DOMCTL_pin_memory_cacheattr.
Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall
---
Changed in v2:
* Check pad is 0.
xen/arch/x86/hvm/dm.c | 18 +
Provide XEN_DMOP_add_to_physmap, a limited version of
XENMEM_add_to_physmap to allow a deprivileged QEMU to move VRAM when a
guest programs its BAR. It is equivalent to XENMEM_add_to_physmap with
space == XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_range.
Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall
---
Changed in v2:
* Make it operate
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 03:50:24PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:20:06PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:02:09PM -0400, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> >> From: Chao Gao
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +unmap_guest_page((void*)qinval_page);
> >> +return ret;
>
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:20:06PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:02:09PM -0400, Lan Tianyu wrote:
>> From: Chao Gao
>>
>> Queued Invalidation Interface is an expanded invalidation interface with
>> extended capabilities. Hardware implementations report support for queu
>>> On 19.10.17 at 17:47, wrote:
> Hoist the l1e_from_pfn(zero_pfn, __PAGE_HYPERVISOR_RO) calculation out of the
> loop, and switch the code over to using mfn_t.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
___
Xen-devel mailing list
On 23.10.2017 11:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.10.17 at 10:34, wrote:
>
>>
>> On 23.10.2017 11:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 20.10.17 at 18:32, wrote:
On 10/20/2017 07:15 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 08:07:41PM +0300, Petre Pircalabu wrote:
>> From: Razvan Coj
>>> On 19.10.17 at 17:47, wrote:
> Also consistently use use nr_frames, rather than mixing nr_pages with a
> frames[] array.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@
>>> On 19.10.17 at 17:47, wrote:
> This also makes the do_update_descriptor() pair of functions adjacent.
>
> Purely code motion; no functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Acked-by: Jan Beulich
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@li
>>> On 23.10.17 at 01:49, wrote:
> flight 115037 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115037/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-st
>>> On 23.10.17 at 10:34, wrote:
>
> On 23.10.2017 11:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 20.10.17 at 18:32, wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2017 07:15 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 08:07:41PM +0300, Petre Pircalabu wrote:
> From: Razvan Cojocaru
>
> For the default EPT view we h
On 23.10.2017 11:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.10.17 at 18:32, wrote:
>> On 10/20/2017 07:15 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 08:07:41PM +0300, Petre Pircalabu wrote:
From: Razvan Cojocaru
For the default EPT view we have xc_set_mem_access_multi(), which
is
>>> On 20.10.17 at 19:32, wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/scripts/build-test.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
> +#!/bin/sh
> +
> +# WARNING: Always backup the branch by creating another reference to it if
> +# you're not familiar with git-rebase(1).
> +#
> +# Use `git rebase` to run command or script on every
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
