>>> On 27.03.17 at 06:41, wrote:
> On 17-03-24 10:52:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 16.03.17 at 12:07, wrote:
>> > @@ -46,6 +50,9 @@
>> > */
>> > #define MAX_COS_REG_CNT 128
>> >
>> > +/* CAT features use 1 COS register in one access. */
>> > +#define CAT_COS_NUM 1
>>
>> With it bei
>>> On 27.03.17 at 04:38, wrote:
> On 17-03-24 10:19:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 16.03.17 at 12:07, wrote:
>> > +struct psr_cat_hw_info {
>> > +unsigned int cbm_len;
>> > +unsigned int cos_max;
>>
>> So you have this field, and ...
>>
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +/*
>> > + * This structur
flight 106929 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/106929/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf d590cce5cd9b9d31848eda4fcb62d1ab3fd05dfd
baseline version:
ovmf c17956e0eedce299ac253
Hi Everyone,
My name is Karthik. I am a first year graduate student in Embedded Systems
at University of Pennsylvania. I am avid c, c++ and python programmer.I
have 4 years of work experience as Embedded Software developer at Airbus.
For the last four months I have been working as a research as
On 24/03/17 20:34, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Qemu-devel [mailto:qemu-devel-
>> bounces+paul.durrant=citrix@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Paul Durrant
>> Sent: 24 March 2017 19:18
>> To: 'Stefano Stabellini' ; Juergen Gross
>>
>> Cc: Anthony Perard ; xen-
>> de...@li
On 17-03-24 10:52:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 16.03.17 at 12:07, wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/psr.c
> > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> > #include
> > #include
> > #include
> > +#include
>
> I'm pretty sure you don't need this. If anything you need
> processor.h (as t
flight 106927 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/106927/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 59254
test-armhf-armhf-xl
On 17-03-24 10:19:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 16.03.17 at 12:07, wrote:
> > +enum psr_feat_type {
> > +PSR_SOCKET_L3_CAT = 0,
>
> Pointless " = 0".
>
Ok, will remove it.
> > +PSR_SOCKET_L3_CDP,
> > +PSR_SOCKET_L2_CAT,
> > +PSR_SOCKET_MAX_FEAT,
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* CAT/CDP H
flight 106926 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/106926/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 59254
test-armhf-armhf-xl
Thanks a lot, Gayathri. I will be looking at that asap.
Saludos,
Jesus.
On Sun, 2017-03-26 at 23:18 +0530, Gayathri Menakath wrote:
> Hello Jesus and Lars,
>
> I have completed the micro task and now I am working on writing tests
> fro my code. The micro task was to write a Python scrip
Hello Jesus and Lars,
I have completed the micro task and now I am working on writing tests fro
my code. The micro task was to write a Python script to use the Perceval
email backend to retrieve data from the xen-devel mailing list, identify
the same threads and feed the result to an ElasticSearch
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 71086 qemu-upstream-4.8-testing real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71086/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 06:34:14PM +, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
[...]
> > > > > It's always been possible to specify dom0=pvh,shadow since PVHv2 Dom0
> > > > > was
> > > > > introduced, there's no change here at all.
> > > >
> > > > If dom0= has never been released, then we can change it however
flight 106923 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/106923/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-xl6 xen-boot fail in 106912 pass in 106923
test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 5
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 01:33:08PM +0200, Felix Schmoll wrote:
[...]
> > So just one last time to be clear about this: You can't just ignore
> interrupts and write all other edges to a shared memory region, like the
> KCOV feature the syzkaller uses does,
Yes, you can.
Since you mention that, let
flight 106925 xen-unstable-coverity real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/106925/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
coverity-amd646 coverity-upload fail REGR. vs. 106549
version t
2017-03-24 13:56 GMT+01:00 Wei Liu :
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 08:34:46AM +0100, Felix Schmoll wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this time for real:
> >
> > so I've been reading up on the task quite a bit now and I'd be thankful
> if
> > you could clarify what exactly you're looking for with the execution
>
flight 106922 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/106922/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 59254
test-armhf-armhf-xl
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 71085 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71085/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 13 saverestore-support-che
flight 106924 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/106924/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf-libvirt 5 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 106829
Tests which did not suc
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 71084 qemu-upstream-4.6-testing real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71084/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13 saverestore
21 matches
Mail list logo
