Re: [Xen-devel] IOMMU fault with IGD passthrough setup on XEN 4.8.0

2017-02-05 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 05.02.17 at 08:18, wrote: > On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 1:51 PM, G.R. wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 17.01.17 at 16:08, wrote: But fortunately commenting out that line could still reproduce the IOMMU fault. I was lucky to capture the fu

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 105558: all pass - PUSHED

2017-02-05 Thread osstest service owner
flight 105558 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/105558/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf 8a399fab0af391945f0eaa251eaf4efe2d71bb3e baseline version: ovmf c5647c6c3c12a7164f486

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 105561: regressions - FAIL

2017-02-05 Thread osstest service owner
flight 105561 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/105561/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-xsm5 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 105279 build-amd64

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/6] COLO-Proxy: Setup userspace colo-proxy on primary side

2017-02-05 Thread Zhang Chen
On 01/28/2017 01:05 AM, Wei Liu wrote: On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 02:36:05PM +0800, Zhang Chen wrote: In this patch we close kernel COLO-Proxy on primary side. Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen Acked-by: Wei Liu I don't claim I know much about COLO though, nor have I ever run it, so it would be bett

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/6] COLO-Proxy: Add remus command to open userspace proxy

2017-02-05 Thread Zhang Chen
On 01/28/2017 01:05 AM, Wei Liu wrote: On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 02:36:04PM +0800, Zhang Chen wrote: Add remus '-p' to enable userspace colo proxy(in qemu). Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen --- docs/man/xl.pod.1.in | 4 tools/libxl/libxl_colo.h | 5 + tools/libxl/libxl_co

[Xen-devel] [ovmf baseline-only test] 68518: regressions - FAIL

2017-02-05 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 68518 ovmf real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68518/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-insta

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 105555: regressions - FAIL

2017-02-05 Thread osstest service owner
flight 10 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/10/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-xsm5 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 105279 build-amd64

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 105553: all pass - PUSHED

2017-02-05 Thread osstest service owner
flight 105553 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/105553/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf c5647c6c3c12a7164f48651730a779fee3b634fc baseline version: ovmf f1d91f33a19b91a204237

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] VT-d/RMRR: Adjust the return values of register_one_rmrr()

2017-02-05 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Venu Busireddy [mailto:venu.busire...@oracle.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 11:08 PM > > Adjust/manage the return values of register_one_rmrr() such that new > callers log errors for non-debug builds too, while not affecting the > behavior of the original callers. > > Signed-off

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 105535: regressions - FAIL

2017-02-05 Thread osstest service owner
flight 105535 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/105535/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 14 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59254 test-amd64-i386-xl

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 105545: regressions - FAIL

2017-02-05 Thread osstest service owner
flight 105545 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/105545/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-xsm5 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 105279 build-amd64

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 105012: regressions - FAIL

2017-02-05 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 01/30/2017 08:36 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 01/30/2017 04:51 PM, osstest service owner wrote: flight 105012 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/105012/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not b

[Xen-devel] kernel BUG at block/bio.c:1786 -- (xen_blkif_schedule on the stack)

2017-02-05 Thread HÃ¥kon Alstadheim
I get the BUG below in dom0 when trying to start a windows 10 domu (hvm, with some pv-drivers installed ) . Below is "xl info", then comes dmesg output, and finally domu config attached at end. This domain is started very rarely, so may have been broken for some time. All my other domains ar linux

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 3.10 032/319] x86/mm/xen: Suppress hugetlbfs in PV guests

2017-02-05 Thread Willy Tarreau
From: Jan Beulich commit 103f6112f253017d7062cd74d17f4a514ed4485c upstream. Huge pages are not normally available to PV guests. Not suppressing hugetlbfs use results in an endless loop of page faults when user mode code tries to access a hugetlbfs mapped area (since the hypervisor denies such PT

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 105539: regressions - FAIL

2017-02-05 Thread osstest service owner
flight 105539 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/105539/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-xsm5 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 105279 build-amd64

[Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH] standalone-reset: use mkdir -p

2017-02-05 Thread Wei Liu
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu --- standalone-reset | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/standalone-reset b/standalone-reset index 69a3226..d3a8f0d 100755 --- a/standalone-reset +++ b/standalone-reset @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ fi ensure_dir () { if test -d "$1"; then ret

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH 4/4] ts-xtf-*: Provide for host specs on command line

2017-02-05 Thread Wei Liu
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 11:55:40AM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Without this, it can be hard to use in ad hoc ways. > > CC: Wei Liu > CC: Andrew Cooper > Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson Ian, I don't see this in master. You seem to have dropped it. Wei. _

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 105534: regressions - FAIL

2017-02-05 Thread osstest service owner
flight 105534 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/105534/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-xsm5 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 105279 build-amd64

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 105515: regressions - FAIL

2017-02-05 Thread osstest service owner
flight 105515 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/105515/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 14 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 59254 test-armhf-armhf-li

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 105531: regressions - FAIL

2017-02-05 Thread osstest service owner
flight 105531 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/105531/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-xsm5 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 105279 build-amd64

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 105523: regressions - FAIL

2017-02-05 Thread osstest service owner
flight 105523 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/105523/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-xsm5 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 105279 build-amd64

Re: [Xen-devel] all packets from HVM guests to PV guests on the same host being dropped

2017-02-05 Thread Sherrard Burton
bump On 01/22/2017 07:24 AM, Sherrard Burton wrote: anyone? On 01/13/2017 08:33 AM, Sherrard Burton wrote: please forgive the cross-posting. having not had much luck on the xen-users list, and having seen similarly-complex threads on this list, i thought i'd see if anyone here had any ideas or

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline bisection] complete build-armhf-xsm

2017-02-05 Thread osstest service owner
branch xen-unstable xenbranch xen-unstable job build-armhf-xsm testid xen-build Tree: qemuu git://git.qemu.org/qemu.git Tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git *** Found and reproduced problem changeset *** Bug is in tree: qemuu git://git.qemu.org/qemu.git Bug introduced: 5459ef3bff961bc46

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 105500: trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

2017-02-05 Thread osstest service owner
flight 105500 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/105500/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf 3 host-install(3)broken REGR. vs. 10545

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-coverity test] 105521: all pass - PUSHED

2017-02-05 Thread osstest service owner
flight 105521 xen-unstable-coverity real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/105521/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: xen ce62b8edd5de7e69ebcd5af0626f63ac6386ad2b baseline version: xen 5a44

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 105517: regressions - FAIL

2017-02-05 Thread osstest service owner
flight 105517 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/105517/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-xsm5 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 105279 build-amd64

Re: [Xen-devel] dom0pvh issue with XEN 4.8.0

2017-02-05 Thread Steven Haigh
On Sunday, 5 February 2017 4:05:32 PM AEDT G.R. wrote: > Hi all, > dom0pvh=1 is not working well for me with XEN 4.8.0 + linux kernel 4.9.2. > > The system boots with no obvious issue. > But many user mode application are suffering from segfault, which > makes the dom0 not useable: The segfault al

[Xen-devel] dom0pvh issue with XEN 4.8.0

2017-02-05 Thread G.R.
Hi all, dom0pvh=1 is not working well for me with XEN 4.8.0 + linux kernel 4.9.2. The system boots with no obvious issue. But many user mode application are suffering from segfault, which makes the dom0 not useable: The segfault always come from libc-2.24.so while it works just fine in PV dom0. I