Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] oxenstored: honour XEN_LOG_DIR defined by configure

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 09:26:05PM +0100, David Scott wrote: > Hi, > > Rather than > > (String.concat “” [a; b]) > > it’s simpler to write > > (a ^ b) > > With that small change, > Indeed, this looks better. I will update the patch accordingly. > Acked-by: David Scott Thanks! Wei. _

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.7-testing test] 95489: regressions - FAIL

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 01:47:33PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 11/06/16 13:00, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 09:31:40AM +, osstest service owner wrote: > >> flight 95489 xen-4.7-testing real [real] > >> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95489/ > >> > >> Regressi

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/time: adjust local system time initialization

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 09:13:14AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > From: Jan Beulich > Using the bare return value from read_platform_stime() is not suitable > when local_time_calibration() is going to use its fat path: Divergence s/fat/fast/ although 'fat path' does have a certain ring to it... Al

[Xen-devel] [BUG] Rhel7u2 guest with kernel 4.6.0 restore and migrate failed

Bug detailed description: 1. Rhel7u2 guest with kernel 4.6.0 migrate failed 2. Rhel7u2 guest with kernel 4.6.0 restore failed 3. Rhel7u2 guest with default kernel (3.10.0) can be restored and migrate successfully Environment : HW: Skylake-SP Xen: Xen 4.7.0 RC4 Do

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 95577: regressions - FAIL

flight 95577 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95577/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-libvirt5 libvirt-build fail REGR. vs. 95460 build-amd64-libvirt

Re: [Xen-devel] questions of vm save/restore on arm64

On 6/12/2016 11:31 PM, Julien Grall wrote: On 12/06/2016 10:46, Chenxiao Zhao wrote: Hi all, Hello, I finally got save/restore working on arm64, but it only works when I assign only one vCPU to VM. If I set vcpus=4 in configure file, the restored VM does not work properly. Can you descri

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing test] 95557: regressions - FAIL

flight 95557 xen-4.5-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95557/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 95290 Regressions which

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 3.2 24/46] x86/mm/xen: Suppress hugetlbfs in PV guests

3.2.81-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Jan Beulich commit 103f6112f253017d7062cd74d17f4a514ed4485c upstream. Huge pages are not normally available to PV guests. Not suppressing hugetlbfs use results in an endless loop of page faults

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.7-testing test] 95554: regressions - FAIL

flight 95554 xen-4.7-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95554/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 15 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 95446 test-amd64-i386-f

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 95549: regressions - FAIL

flight 95549 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95549/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 17 guest-start/debianhvm.repeat fail REGR. vs. 94748 test-amd64-amd64-

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 95550: regressions - FAIL

flight 95550 xen-4.4-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95550/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 15 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 95234 Regressions which

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 95543: regressions - FAIL

flight 95543 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95543/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 95353 test-armhf-armhf-xl-

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 05/11] IOMMU/MMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to iommu_iotlb_flush{, _all} (top level ones)

Hello, On 12/06/2016 07:55, Tian, Kevin wrote: From: Julien Grall [mailto:julien.gr...@arm.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 8:40 PM Hi Jan, On 09/06/16 13:32, Jan Beulich wrote: On 09.06.16 at 14:24, wrote: So the behavior of iommu_iotlb_flush is up to the IOMMU driver. Whilst the behavio

Re: [Xen-devel] questions of vm save/restore on arm64

On 12/06/2016 10:46, Chenxiao Zhao wrote: Hi all, Hello, I finally got save/restore working on arm64, but it only works when I assign only one vCPU to VM. If I set vcpus=4 in configure file, the restored VM does not work properly. Can you describe what you mean by "does not work properly"?

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: fix an error path that uses uninitialised rc in libxl_set_memory_target

ecdc6fd8 ("libxl: Fix libxl_set_memory_target return value") failed to initialised rc in one failure path. Fix it in this path. Also fixed an indentation issue while I was there. CID: 1362695 Signed-off-by: Wei Liu --- Cc: Ian Jackson Cc: George Dunlap Cc: Paulina Szubarczyk --- tools/libxl

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.3-testing test] 95534: trouble: blocked/broken

flight 95534 qemu-upstream-4.3-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95534/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i3863 host-install(3) broken REG

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.5-testing test] 95527: regressions - FAIL

flight 95527 qemu-upstream-4.5-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95527/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl 15 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 93922 Regress

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-coverity test] 95595: all pass - PUSHED

flight 95595 xen-unstable-coverity real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95595/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed version targeted for testing: xen 6e908ee108caec78f95e639b8ef43ac5dd1d5e45 baseline version: xen 936a7a5483fbdd4ae3

[Xen-devel] MEM_SHARING_DEBUG

Hi, how to does MEM_SHARING_DEBUG works in xen ? This function is located at and its internal structure is xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_sharing.c debugtrace_printk("*mem_sharing_debug*: %s(): " _f, _

Re: [Xen-devel] questions of vm save/restore on arm64

On 6/7/2016 9:17 AM, Chenxiao Zhao wrote: On 6/6/2016 7:58 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, Chenxiao Zhao wrote: On 6/3/2016 4:02 AM, Julien Grall wrote: Hello, First thing, the time in the mail headers seems to be wrong. Maybe because of a wrong timezone? I got: 04/06/1

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 09/11] vt-d: fix the IOMMU flush issue

On June 12, 2016 3:33 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > From: Xu, Quan > > Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 4:59 PM @@ -545,18 +549,42 @@ static > > int __must_check iommu_flush_all(void) { > > struct acpi_drhd_unit *drhd; > > struct iommu *iommu; > > -int flush_dev_iotlb; > > +int rc =

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.18 test] 95521: regressions - FAIL

flight 95521 linux-3.18 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95521/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel 13 xen-boot/l1fail REGR. vs. 94728 Tests which are failin

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 07/11] IOMMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to IOMMU suspending (top level ones)

> -Original Message- > From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Jan > Beulich > Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 10:52 PM > To: Xu, Quan > Cc: Tian, Kevin ; Stefano Stabellini > ; Wu, Feng ; Liu Jinsong > ; dario.faggi...@citrix.com; xen- > de...@lists.xen.org;

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] nested vmx: Validate host VMX MSRs before accessing them

> From: Euan Harris [mailto:euan.har...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 9:21 PM > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 06:47:55AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > /* > > > - * Those MSRs are available only when bit 55 of > > > - * MSR_IA32_VMX_BASIC is set. > > > + * These MSRs ar

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] nested vmx: Fix comment typos in nvmx_msr_read_intercept()

> From: Euan Harris [mailto:euan.har...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 6:14 PM > > Signed-off-by: Euan Harris Acked-by: Kevin Tian ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 11/11] vt-d: add __must_check annotation to IOMMU flush pointers and handlers

> From: Xu, Quan > Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 4:59 PM > > From: Quan Xu > > Signed-off-by: Quan Xu > Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich Acked-by: Kevin Tian ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 10/11] vt-d: propagate the IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to ME phantom functions

> From: Xu, Quan > Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 4:59 PM > > From: Quan Xu > > Signed-off-by: Quan Xu > Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich > Acked-by: Kevin Tian ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 09/11] vt-d: fix the IOMMU flush issue

> From: Xu, Quan > Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 4:59 PM > @@ -545,18 +549,42 @@ static int __must_check iommu_flush_all(void) > { > struct acpi_drhd_unit *drhd; > struct iommu *iommu; > -int flush_dev_iotlb; > +int rc = 0; > > flush_all_cache(); > for_each_drhd_unit

[Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 95517: regressions - FAIL

flight 95517 linux-4.1 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95517/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 10 guest-startfail REGR. vs. 94729 Tests which are failing

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 05/11] IOMMU/MMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to iommu_iotlb_flush{, _all} (top level ones)

On June 12, 2016 2:56 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > From: Julien Grall [mailto:julien.gr...@arm.com] > > Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 8:40 PM > > > > Hi Jan, > > > > On 09/06/16 13:32, Jan Beulich wrote: > > On 09.06.16 at 14:24, wrote: > > >> So the behavior of iommu_iotlb_flush is up to the