[Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing test] 60723: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2015-08-18 Thread osstest service owner
flight 60723 xen-4.5-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60723/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-raw 9 debian-di-install fail REGR. vs. 60638 test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds

Re: [Xen-devel] Could Xen hyperviosr be able to invoke Linux systemcalls?

2015-08-18 Thread Kun Cheng
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 5:16 PM Dario Faggioli wrote: > On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 01:18 +, Kun Cheng wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:25 AM Dario Faggioli > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 00:55 +, Kun Cheng wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 17

[Xen-devel] BoF: pv yielding - Xen Developer summit 2015

2015-08-18 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
Here are the notes / slides / conclusions from the pv yielding BoF: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1M4GJoV6LZ5UssgL2iv5b2Da_yd9zF5t6797uRVQFInY/edit#slide=id.p Luis ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-d

[Xen-devel] [raisin][PATCH] Gracefully handle an unsupported distro.

2015-08-18 Thread Doug Goldstein
When your distro is not supported, handle the case gracefully and let the user know instead of spitting out bash errors. Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein --- lib/common-functions.sh | 11 +++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/common-functions.sh b/lib/common-functions.sh in

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 20/22] xen/arm: ITS: Map ITS translation space

2015-08-18 Thread Marc Zyngier
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 20:14:43 +0100 Julien Grall wrote: > Hi, > > On 27/07/2015 04:12, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote: > > From: Vijaya Kumar K > > > > ITS translation space contains GITS_TRANSLATOR register > > s/GITS_TRANSLATOR/GITS_TRANSLATOR/ I assume you mean GITS_TRANSLATER? ;-) > > > whi

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.18 test] 60714: regressions - FAIL

2015-08-18 Thread osstest service owner
flight 60714 linux-3.18 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60714/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 58581 Tests which are failin

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 60715: regressions - FAIL

2015-08-18 Thread osstest service owner
flight 60715 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60715/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 16 guest-start/debianhvm.repeat fail REGR. vs. 60681

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 20/22] xen/arm: ITS: Map ITS translation space

2015-08-18 Thread Julien Grall
Hi, On 27/07/2015 04:12, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote: From: Vijaya Kumar K ITS translation space contains GITS_TRANSLATOR register s/GITS_TRANSLATOR/GITS_TRANSLATOR/ which is written by device to raise LPI. This space needs to mapped to every domain address space for all physical ITS avai

Re: [Xen-devel] Design doc of adding ACPI support for arm64 on Xen - version 3

2015-08-18 Thread Julien Grall
On 18/08/2015 00:01, Jan Beulich wrote: On 18.08.15 at 08:43, wrote: Hi Jan, On 17/08/2015 22:10, Jan Beulich wrote: Julien Grall 08/17/15 6:27 PM >>> On 17/08/2015 08:33, Jan Beulich wrote: On 14.08.15 at 16:59, wrote: b) Create EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR table. This will add memory start

Re: [Xen-devel] Design doc of adding ACPI support for arm64 on Xen - version 3

2015-08-18 Thread Julien Grall
Hi, On 18/08/2015 02:34, Shannon Zhao wrote: IIUC, this is a requirement for Linux. Because when Linux parses the minimal DT, it uses below dt_params to match the DT properties. If it doesn't match any of them, it will fial. See efi_get_fdt_params in drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c. This is *not* a

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Support of non-indirect grant backend on 64KB guest

2015-08-18 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Roger, On 18/08/2015 00:09, Roger Pau Monné wrote: Hello, El 18/08/15 a les 8.29, Julien Grall ha escrit: Hi, Firstly, this patch is not ready at all and mostly here for collecting comment about the way to do it. It's not clean so no need to complain about the coding style. The qdisk ba

Re: [Xen-devel] linux-next: Tree for Aug 18 (xen/apic)

2015-08-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 08/18/15 04:40, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20150817: > on i386: CONFIG_SMP is not enabled. # CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC is not set ../arch/x86/xen/apic.c: In function 'xen_io_apic_read': ../arch/x86/xen/apic.c:18:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'mpc_ioapic_addr

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 3/4] HVM x86 deprivileged mode: Code for switching into/out of deprivileged mode

2015-08-18 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 17/08/15 08:07, Tim Deegan wrote: At 14:53 +0100 on 17 Aug (1439823232), Ben Catterall wrote: On 12/08/15 14:33, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 12/08/15 14:29, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 11/08/15 19:29, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: Would switching TR only when we know that we need to enter this deprivil

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] xen: if on Xen, "flatten" the scheduling domain hierarchy

2015-08-18 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On August 18, 2015 8:55:32 AM PDT, Dario Faggioli wrote: >Hey everyone, > >So, as a followup of what we were discussing in this thread: > > [Xen-devel] PV-vNUMA issue: topology is misinterpreted by the guest >http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-07/msg03241.html > >I started l

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 28/31] libxc/xen: introduce HVM_PARAM_CMDLINE_PFN

2015-08-18 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 18/08/15 03:01, Roger Pau Monné wrote: El 07/08/15 a les 19.30, Andrew Cooper ha escrit: On 07/08/15 11:18, Roger Pau Monne wrote: This HVM parameter returns a PFN that contains the address of the memory page where the guest command line has been placed. Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné Cc:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 24/31] libxc: allow creating domains without emulated devices.

2015-08-18 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 17/08/15 08:55, Roger Pau Monné wrote: El 07/08/15 a les 18.36, Andrew Cooper ha escrit: On 07/08/15 11:18, Roger Pau Monne wrote: @@ -1336,7 +1343,8 @@ static int meminit_hvm(struct xc_dom_image *dom) * tot_pages will be target_pages - VGA_HOLE_SIZE after * this call

Re: [Xen-devel] Design doc of adding ACPI support for arm64 on Xen - version 3

2015-08-18 Thread Julien Grall
On 18/08/2015 00:23, Shannon Zhao wrote: On 2015/8/18 14:36, Julien Grall wrote: On 17/08/2015 20:19, Shannon Zhao wrote: Yes, I think it's good to drop the "linux," too. But if we drop the linux, would it impact the linux kernel booting with UEFI? And why we don't do it to Xen since Xen

[Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] xen: if on Xen, "flatten" the scheduling domain hierarchy

2015-08-18 Thread Dario Faggioli
Hey everyone, So, as a followup of what we were discussing in this thread: [Xen-devel] PV-vNUMA issue: topology is misinterpreted by the guest http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-07/msg03241.html I started looking in more details at scheduling domains in the Linux kernel.

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxenstore: Use poll() with a non-blocking read()

2015-08-18 Thread Jonathan Creekmore
David Vrabel writes: > On 16/08/15 09:59, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 16:44 -0500, Jonathan Creekmore wrote: >>> With the addition of FMODE_ATOMIC_POS in the Linux 3.14 kernel, >>> concurrent blocking file accesses to a single open file descriptor can >>> cause a deadlock trying

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 3/4] HVM x86 deprivileged mode: Code for switching into/out of deprivileged mode

2015-08-18 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 18.08.15 at 12:26, wrote: > On 18/08/15 11:25, Ben Catterall wrote: >> On 17/08/15 16:17, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 17.08.15 at 17:07, wrote: At 14:53 +0100 on 17 Aug (1439823232), Ben Catterall wrote: > So, have we arrived at a decision for this? Thanks! Seems to hav

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 08/23] x86: add multiboot2 protocol support

2015-08-18 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 18.08.15 at 14:00, wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 02:12:58AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 20.07.15 at 16:29, wrote: >> > @@ -119,10 +213,11 @@ __start: >> > >> > /* Save the Multiboot info struct (after relocation) for later >> > use. */ >> > mov $sym_phys(c

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 60713: regressions - FAIL

2015-08-18 Thread osstest service owner
flight 60713 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60713/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 60685 Regressions which a

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 1/2] Differentiate IO/mem resources tracked by ioreq server

2015-08-18 Thread Paul Durrant
> -Original Message- > From: Yu, Zhang [mailto:yu.c.zh...@linux.intel.com] > Sent: 17 August 2015 22:34 > To: Paul Durrant; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Ian Jackson; Stefano Stabellini; > Ian > Campbell; Wei Liu; Keir (Xen.org); jbeul...@suse.com; Andrew Cooper > Cc: Kevin Tian; zhiyuan...@int

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 6/6] multiboot2: Do not pass memory maps to image if EFI boot services are enabled

2015-08-18 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 02:59:56PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 04:35:54PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > Do not pass memory maps to image if it asked for EFI boot services. Maps are > > usually invalid in that case and they can confuse potential user. Image > > sh

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 08/23] x86: add multiboot2 protocol support

2015-08-18 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 02:12:58AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 20.07.15 at 16:29, wrote: [...] > > @@ -119,10 +213,11 @@ __start: > > > > /* Save the Multiboot info struct (after relocation) for later > > use. */ > > mov $sym_phys(cpu0_stack)+1024,%esp > > +

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 3/4] HVM x86 deprivileged mode: Code for switching into/out of deprivileged mode

2015-08-18 Thread Ben Catterall
On 18/08/15 11:25, Ben Catterall wrote: On 17/08/15 16:17, Jan Beulich wrote: On 17.08.15 at 17:07, wrote: At 14:53 +0100 on 17 Aug (1439823232), Ben Catterall wrote: So, have we arrived at a decision for this? Thanks! Seems to have stalled a bit. OK, I propose that: - we use TR/IST

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 3/4] HVM x86 deprivileged mode: Code for switching into/out of deprivileged mode

2015-08-18 Thread Ben Catterall
On 17/08/15 16:17, Jan Beulich wrote: On 17.08.15 at 17:07, wrote: At 14:53 +0100 on 17 Aug (1439823232), Ben Catterall wrote: So, have we arrived at a decision for this? Thanks! Seems to have stalled a bit. OK, I propose that: - we use TR/IST to make Xen take interrupts/exceptions at a

[Xen-devel] [linux-mingo-tip-master test] 60712: regressions - FAIL

2015-08-18 Thread osstest service owner
flight 60712 linux-mingo-tip-master real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60712/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 60684 test-amd64

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 28/31] libxc/xen: introduce HVM_PARAM_CMDLINE_PFN

2015-08-18 Thread Roger Pau Monné
El 07/08/15 a les 19.30, Andrew Cooper ha escrit: > On 07/08/15 11:18, Roger Pau Monne wrote: >> This HVM parameter returns a PFN that contains the address of the memory >> page where the guest command line has been placed. >> >> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné >> Cc: Ian Jackson >> Cc: Stefano St

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxenstore: Use poll() with a non-blocking read()

2015-08-18 Thread David Vrabel
On 16/08/15 09:59, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 16:44 -0500, Jonathan Creekmore wrote: >> With the addition of FMODE_ATOMIC_POS in the Linux 3.14 kernel, >> concurrent blocking file accesses to a single open file descriptor can >> cause a deadlock trying to grab the file position loc

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 0/5] Multi-queue support for xen-blkfront and xen-blkback

2015-08-18 Thread Rafal Mielniczuk
On 14/08/15 13:30, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote: > On 14/08/15 09:31, Bob Liu wrote: >> On 08/13/2015 12:46 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote: >>> On 12/08/15 11:17, Bob Liu wrote: On 08/12/2015 01:32 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 08/11/2015 03:45 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote: >> On 11/08/15 07:08, Bob

Re: [Xen-devel] Design doc of adding ACPI support for arm64 on Xen - version 3

2015-08-18 Thread Shannon Zhao
On 2015/8/18 17:11, Jan Beulich wrote: On 18.08.15 at 10:21, wrote: > >> >> On 2015/8/18 16:15, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 18.08.15 at 09:35, wrote: Hi Jan, On 2015/8/18 13:14, Jan Beulich wrote: Shannon Zhao 08/18/15 5:46 AM >>> >> On 2015/8/17 23:33, Jan B

Re: [Xen-devel] Could Xen hyperviosr be able to invoke Linux systemcalls?

2015-08-18 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 01:18 +, Kun Cheng wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:25 AM Dario Faggioli > wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 00:55 +, Kun Cheng wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:16 AM Frediano Ziglio > > > > > Wh

Re: [Xen-devel] Design doc of adding ACPI support for arm64 on Xen - version 3

2015-08-18 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 18.08.15 at 10:21, wrote: > > On 2015/8/18 16:15, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 18.08.15 at 09:35, wrote: >>> Hi Jan, >>> >>> On 2015/8/18 13:14, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> Shannon Zhao 08/18/15 5:46 AM >>> > On 2015/8/17 23:33, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 14.08.15 at 16:59, wrot

Re: [Xen-devel] Design doc of adding ACPI support for arm64 on Xen - version 3

2015-08-18 Thread Shannon Zhao
On 2015/8/18 16:15, Jan Beulich wrote: On 18.08.15 at 09:35, wrote: >> Hi Jan, >> >> On 2015/8/18 13:14, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Shannon Zhao 08/18/15 5:46 AM >>> On 2015/8/17 23:33, Jan Beulich wrote: On 14.08.15 at 16:59, wrote: >> 1. Copy and change some EFI and ACP

Re: [Xen-devel] Design doc of adding ACPI support for arm64 on Xen - version 3

2015-08-18 Thread Shannon Zhao
On 2015/8/18 15:01, Jan Beulich wrote: On 18.08.15 at 08:43, wrote: >> > Hi Jan, >> > >> > On 17/08/2015 22:10, Jan Beulich wrote: >> > Julien Grall 08/17/15 6:27 PM >>> >>> On 17/08/2015 08:33, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 14.08.15 at 16:59, wrote: >> > b)

[Xen-devel] [distros-debian-squeeze test] 37836: all pass

2015-08-18 Thread Platform Team regression test user
flight 37836 distros-debian-squeeze real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/37836/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed baseline version: flight 37818 jobs: build-amd64 pass build-armhf

Re: [Xen-devel] Design doc of adding ACPI support for arm64 on Xen - version 3

2015-08-18 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 18.08.15 at 09:35, wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On 2015/8/18 13:14, Jan Beulich wrote: > Shannon Zhao 08/18/15 5:46 AM >>> >>> On 2015/8/17 23:33, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 14.08.15 at 16:59, wrote: > 1. Copy and change some EFI and ACPI tables > -

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 08/23] x86: add multiboot2 protocol support

2015-08-18 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 20.07.15 at 16:29, wrote: > v2 - not fixed yet: >- dynamic dependency generation for xen/arch/x86/boot/reloc.S; > this requires more work; I am not sure that it pays because > potential patch requires more changes than addition of just > multiboot2.h to Makefile > (s

Re: [Xen-devel] Design doc of adding ACPI support for arm64 on Xen - version 3

2015-08-18 Thread Shannon Zhao
Hi Jan, On 2015/8/18 13:14, Jan Beulich wrote: Shannon Zhao 08/18/15 5:46 AM >>> >> On 2015/8/17 23:33, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 14.08.15 at 16:59, wrote: 1. Copy and change some EFI and ACPI tables --- >>> >>> While some explanation on

Re: [Xen-devel] Second regression due to libxl: Remove linux udev rules (2ba368d13893402b2f1fb3c283ddcc714659dd9b)

2015-08-18 Thread Roger Pau Monné
El 12/08/15 a les 16.09, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk ha escrit: > On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 04:58:57PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >> El 07/08/15 a les 16.54, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk ha escrit: >>> Ok. I hadn't run your patch yet. Do you want me to run the latest staging >>> instead once more with my test-

Re: [Xen-devel] Design doc of adding ACPI support for arm64 on Xen - version 3

2015-08-18 Thread Shannon Zhao
On 2015/8/18 14:36, Julien Grall wrote: > > > On 17/08/2015 20:19, Shannon Zhao wrote: Yes, I think it's good to drop the "linux," too. But if we drop the linux, would it impact the linux kernel booting with UEFI? And why we don't do it to Xen since Xen still uses "linux,"? >>> >

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Support of non-indirect grant backend on 64KB guest

2015-08-18 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 18.08.15 at 09:09, wrote: > Hello, > > El 18/08/15 a les 8.29, Julien Grall ha escrit: >> Hi, >> >> Firstly, this patch is not ready at all and mostly here for collecting > comment about the way to do it. It's not clean so no need to complain about > the coding style. >> >> The qdisk b

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Support of non-indirect grant backend on 64KB guest

2015-08-18 Thread Roger Pau Monné
Hello, El 18/08/15 a les 8.29, Julien Grall ha escrit: > Hi, > > Firstly, this patch is not ready at all and mostly here for collecting > comment about the way to do it. It's not clean so no need to complain about > the coding style. > > The qdisk backend in QEMU is not supporting indirect gra

Re: [Xen-devel] Design doc of adding ACPI support for arm64 on Xen - version 3

2015-08-18 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 18.08.15 at 08:43, wrote: > Hi Jan, > > On 17/08/2015 22:10, Jan Beulich wrote: > Julien Grall 08/17/15 6:27 PM >>> >>> On 17/08/2015 08:33, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 14.08.15 at 16:59, wrote: > b) Create EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR table. This will add memory start and > size