branch xen-unstable
xen branch xen-unstable
job test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64
test debian-hvm-install
Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git
Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-xen-unstable.git
Tree: qe
flight 33474 libvirt real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33474/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-libvirt5 libvirt-build fail REGR. vs. 33422
build-armhf-libvirt
On 16/01/2015 19:34, Julien Grall wrote:
On 16/01/15 19:11, Iurii Konovalenko wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
On 16/01/15 16:17, Iurii Konovalenko wrote:
I tried to add instruction: asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c14, c0, 0" :
: "r" (freq));
Also I tried to write
flight 33462 linux-3.14 real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33462/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64 7 rumpuserxen-demo-setup fail REGR. vs.
33341
test-amd64-amd64-xl
flight 33461 qemu-upstream-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33461/
Failures and problems with tests :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-libvirt3 host-install(3) broken REGR.
flight 33457 linux-next real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33457/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs. 33426
test-amd64-i386-freebs
flight 33455 linux-linus real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33455/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 33426
test-amd64-i386-xl-qe
On 17/01/2015 09:31, Tim Deegan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At 19:33 +0100 on 16 Jan (1421433186), Tim Deegan wrote:
- Feature compatibilty/completeness. You pointed out yourself that
it doesn't work with nested HVM or migration. I think I'd have to
add mem_event/access/paging and PCI pas
flight 33452 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33452/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-amd 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 33424
Regressions which a
At 13:43 -0800 on 16 Jan (1421412191), Ed White wrote:
> I've tried to make all my work consistent with existing code
> and design in the same vein or same source file, regardless of my
> opinion of that existing content, unless I had some compelling reason
> not to. I've also tried not to touch an
At 10:35 -0800 on 16 Jan (1421400901), Ed White wrote:
> On 01/16/2015 09:52 AM, Tim Deegan wrote:
> > At 12:38 -0800 on 15 Jan (1421321902), Ed White wrote:
> >> On 01/15/2015 09:03 AM, Tim Deegan wrote:
> >>> At 13:26 -0800 on 09 Jan (1420806397), Ed White wrote:
> This is treated exactly li
At 12:32 -0800 on 16 Jan (1421407932), Ed White wrote:
> >
> >> As I said in discussion with Andrew, my aim was to make it possible
> >> for these same changes to be extensible to AMD processors if they
> >> support multiple copies of whatever their EPT equivalent is, by
> >> simply emulating VMFU
Hi,
At 19:33 +0100 on 16 Jan (1421433186), Tim Deegan wrote:
> > > - Feature compatibilty/completeness. You pointed out yourself that
> > > it doesn't work with nested HVM or migration. I think I'd have to
> > > add mem_event/access/paging and PCI passthrough to the list of
> > > features
13 matches
Mail list logo
