When excuting xl migrate/Remus, the following error occurd:
[root@master xen]# xl migrate 5 slaver
migration target: Ready to receive domain.
Saving to migration stream new xl format (info 0x1/0x0/1225)
Loading new save file (new xl fmt info 0x1/0x0/1225)
Savefile contains xl domain config in JSO
Hello Don,
xen_emul_unplug=unnecessary does the trick, I am able to see the vmxnet3
driver using lspci and ethtool -I eth0. Thanks a lot for your help, much
appreciated.
Performance between vmxnet3 running on XEN is about 1/3 of vmxnet3 running on
ESXi. Similar performance number I get betwee
I'll work out a new design proposal based on below content and previous
discussions. Thanks Tiejun for your hard-working and Jan for your careful
reviews so far.
For below comment:
> > Also there's clearly an alternative proposal: Drop support for sharing
> > page tables. Your colleagues will sure
flight 32564 linux-linus real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/32564/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 7 freebsd-install fail like 32546
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd6
Jan,
Thanks for your time but I'm not going to address your comments here.
Because I heard this design is totally not satisfied your expectation.
But this really was reviewed with several revisions by Kevin and Yang
before sending in public...
Anyway, I guess the only thing what I can do is
flight 32561 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/32561/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 17 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 32542
Regressions which a
flight 32557 linux-3.10 real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/32557/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 26303
Regressions which are
flight 32554 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/32554/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-pair17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail like 32535
Tests which did not succeed,
flight 32555 libvirt real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/32555/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-i386-libvirt 9 guest-start fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 9 guest-start
By iterating up to <= mi->nr_mods we are running off the end of the boot
modules, but more importantly it causes us to then skip the first FDT reserved
region, meaning we might clobber it.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell
---
For 4.5: I think this bug fix should go in, it fixes a real issue and is low
flight 32542 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/32542/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-pair17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail like 32459
Tests which did not succeed,
11 matches
Mail list logo
