Re: [Wormux-dev] Grapple is fixed

2010-04-20 Par sujet kurosu
Hello, sorry for the very long delay, but for the last 2 weeks, sending a mail always timed out using proxad/free webmail or mail server. Le 13/04/2010 14:31, Matthieu Fertré a écrit : > Could you tell us when do you think you will have time to reinstall your > mingw setup ? I was thinking in w

Re: [Wormux-dev] Grapple is fixed

2010-04-13 Par sujet Matthieu Fertré
> Btw, I currently can't produce Windows binaries: my mingw setup is > broken, having to reinstall from scratch. I won't be able to investigate > in the near future, so the Windows version may be delayed. > Could you tell us when do you think you will have time to reinstall your mingw setup

Re: [Wormux-dev] Grapple is fixed

2010-04-09 Par sujet kurosu
Le 01/04/2010 08:59, Matthieu Fertré a écrit : > By the way, if everybody agrees that it much better, maybe we can > release yet another version : 0.9.2. This version would contain few > things : the new grapple implementation, bugfix for the bugzilla team, > maybe some fixes about japanese and chi

Re: [Wormux-dev] Grapple is fixed

2010-04-06 Par sujet Matthieu Fertré
Hi, Just a few feedback about current trunk: I have just tested the trunk in network with the fixedpoint library. One instance was compiled in debug mode, while the other was compiled in release mode. Both were running on the same computer. Server has only one AI team, client has one human team a

Re: [Wormux-dev] Grapple is fixed

2010-04-05 Par sujet Florian Köberle
Hello Matt, subversion wasn't working at the weekend for some reason. Now it works again and I have downloaded your recent grapple changes. The grapple bug is gone: I could not reproduce it anymore. Good job! Sometimes there are very minor graphical issues but it's definitive much better then bef

Re: [Wormux-dev] Grapple is fixed

2010-04-04 Par sujet Matthieu Fertré
No feedback :'( Nobody cares ? Le 01/04/2010 08:59, Matthieu Fertré a écrit : > Hi, > > I have worked tuesday evening on the grapple and I hope to have fixed > most of the problem it had. Could you give some feedback about the > current implementation ? > > By the way, if everybody agrees that i