IANAL but "Nothing" is the intention. See 5th paragraph and last
multi-line paragraph here:
http://robmensching.com/blog/posts/2012/8/20/The-WiX-toolset-license (I
should have numbered the paragrpahs )
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Peter Hull wrote:
> Thanks, that does help. If I could just
Thanks, that does help. If I could just ask the question slightly differently:
If I modified the WiX source, as I understand it, I would need to licence my
changed WiX source under MS-RL and make it freely available.
If I downloaded a binary of the WiX toolset and then used that toolset
(unchang
Microsoft itself is violating the
> license
> in this regard. Given the widespread use of WiX in MSFT, surely there are
> some violations like this.)
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bruce Cran [mailto:br...@cran.org.uk]
> > Sent: Monday, August 20, 20
se of WiX in MSFT, surely there are
some violations like this.)
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Cran [mailto:br...@cran.org.uk]
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 16:30
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] WiX joins the Outerc
On 20/08/2012 16:41, Rob Mensching wrote:
> I think wrote
> down the answer this morning:
> http://robmensching.com/blog/posts/2012/8/20/The-WiX-toolset-license
Thanks, it's great to see that update on licensing.
Since the 'viral' nature of copyleft licenses scares some people, it
might be worth
Sorry, whole family + nanny has been sick over last week. I think wrote
down the answer this morning:
http://robmensching.com/blog/posts/2012/8/20/The-WiX-toolset-license
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Peter Hull wrote:
> > From: edwin.cas...@fiserv.com
> > Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:12:44 -040
> From: edwin.cas...@fiserv.com
> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:12:44 -0400
>
> I think it is important to ask these questions if only to determine the
> intentions of the licensors and encourage that the license be more explicit
> about its intentions. These things should not be determined in cour
ednesday, August 15, 2012 5:46 AM
> To: WiX Users
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] WiX joins the Outercurve Foundation
>
>
> > Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:08:06 +0100
> > From: br...@cran.org.uk
>
> > This sounds to me rather simi
> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:08:06 +0100
> From: br...@cran.org.uk
> This sounds to me rather similar to requirement iv. under the previous CPL:
>
> iv. states that source code for the Program is available from such
> Contributor, and informs licensees how t
On 15/08/2012 12:55, Peter Hull wrote:
> (A) Reciprocal Grants- For any file you distribute that contains code from
> the software (in source code or binary format), you must provide recipients
> the source code to that file along with a copy of this license, which license
> will govern that fil
> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:06:07 +0100
> From: br...@cran.org.uk
> I'm a bit surprised that the license change wasn't highlighted - it
> seems WiX is now licensed under the Ms-Rl.
I would appreciate some clarification on this license too.
(A) Reciprocal Grants- For any file you distribute that
On 14/08/2012 17:01, Bob Arnson wrote:
> http://www.outercurve.org/Blogs/EntryId/58/WiX-joins-the-Outercurve-Foundation
>
> http://robmensching.com/blog/posts/2012/8/14/Outercurve-Foundation-and-WiX-toolset-together-at-last
I'm a bit surprised that the license change wasn't highlighted - it
seems
http://www.outercurve.org/Blogs/EntryId/58/WiX-joins-the-Outercurve-Foundation
http://robmensching.com/blog/posts/2012/8/14/Outercurve-Foundation-and-WiX-toolset-together-at-last
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
