nt="yes"/>
>
>
>
> name="include">defines.wxi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Go
I use heat to generate a WXS file with Fragments. I used the -var arg to
replace the path to the files with a preprocessor variable. I can specify
the variable's value in the command line to candle with the -d argument.
But, I have a wxi file that I would like to include.
I can transform the ou
staller XML toolset.
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Querying the package and installed
> productarchitecture
>
> It's nearly 2012 and I'd much rather use C# and DTF. Perhaps
> in 1999 those
> VBScript files were interesting and useful. I can understand
> the msi.h
There are tools in the Windows SDK (I am currently using v7) that can query
an MSI database. Look especially at the vbs scripts, you can invoke them
with SQL to query properties and tables.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa372865(v=vs.85).as
px
Gary
> -Original Messa
Here is the post that leads me to believe that admin rights are required
for ICEs and NIT. It is a continuous integration environment that fails for
me with a build account that does not have admin rights:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1064580/wix-3-0-throws-error-217-while-be
ing-executed-
Is it correct to say that if LIGHT is allowed to run the internal
consistency evaluators (ICEs, light runs them by default), and if NIT is
used to run unit tests, that the account performing these actions requires
admin rights? (WIX 3.5, Windows Server 2008 R2.)
This is because ICEs and NIT run
A even run? You probably need to schedule it in
InstallExecuteSequence. New to Lux myself, but I don't think Lux
starts/stops the CA's by itself.
--
John M. Cooper
-Original Message-----
From: Gary Gocek [mailto:g...@gocek.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 2:48 PM
To: Ge
I'm having trouble with my first attempt at unit-testing custom actions
with Lux.
In a fragment in "properties.wxs",
In a fragment in "CustomActions.wxs",
I have Binary and CustomAction elements to configure "FooMethod" as
immediate.
In the C# code for custom action "FooMethod",
session["BAR_
I deploy an unversioned file (with a CompanionFile setting) and modify the
file during the install based on GUI entries. The repair case does not
present the whole GUI, just the maintenance dialog, so during a repair, the
file gets redeployed but the GUI entries are not available to re-modify it
ginal Message-
> From: Bob Arnson [mailto:b...@joyofsetup.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2011 3:30 PM
> To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] How does order of controls in dialog
> XML affect dialog behavior?
>
>
> On 23-Sep-11 21:16, Gar
Is there some info on how WIX 3.5.2519.0 dialog behavior is affected by the
order in which the control elements are written in the XML?
For example, I had a problem with my Next button not being the default
button, even when it was the only control on the dialog marked as "default".
I fixed the pr
Try codeplex.com, that's the open source repository that is more focused on
.NET. WIX is there. I haven't had trouble at sourceforge lately, but try
codeplex.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Farrow [mailto:sean.far...@seanfarrow.co.uk]
> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 9:31 PM
> To: wi
With WIX 3.5.2519, I started with the minimal GUI and added a few dialog
pages. I copied several of the GUI dialog files from the source directory.
Among other things, I replaced the left-side dialog bitmap and the top
banner bitmap on various dialogs. When the GUI starts up, I see a (very)
brief f
Summary: .NET 3.5 installer for .NET 4.0 app. If rollback occurs under Win
2K3, .NET 2.0 is uninstalled as well as app.
I have a .NET 3.5 installer for a .NET 4.0 web application, built with WIX
3.5.2110. It installs and uninstalls successfully under Windows Server 2003
and Windows Server 2008. T
I am working on a project that makes use of setupbld from Wix 3.0 to build a
bootstrapper (even though we use Wix 3.5 to build our MSIs). We don't chain
MSIs or install pre-requisites. We use a bootstrapper for UAC compatibility.
For this limited purpose, setupbld works OK.
In order to help with i
I have a .NET 4 web app that runs under IIS6 and IIS7. If .NET 2 or 3 is
installed on the client (along with .NET 4), the web site (IIS6) or
application pool (IIS7) needs to be changed from the default .NET Framework
Version to .NET 4, since the default is .NET 2.
Manually, in IIS manager, with Wi
I previously posted that my .NET 4 project with .NET 4 custom actions had
been failing. This has been resolved, thanks to a co-worker's good catch. I
can now author a totally .NET 4 app from VS 2010 with WIX 3.5.
The MSI log error was:
System.BadImageFormatException: Could not load file or assemb
y with the runtime.
Any help would be appreciated.
-Original Message-----
From: Gary Gocek [mailto:g...@gocek.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 7:26 PM
To: 'wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: BadImageFormatException, Microsoft.Deployment.WindowsInstaller
I'm build
I'm building a project on Win 2008 Server 64-bit, using TFS 2010 build
services and Visual Studio 2010. All projects in the solution are for VS
2010 and .NET Framework 4 (recently converted from VS 2008 and .NET 3.5).
The projects are set for "Any CPU" (so the Platform property in the .csproj
files
When WIX is installed, it updates Visual Studio to provide, for example, a
C# custom action project type. This project type refers to
Microsoft.Deployment.WindowsInstaller.dll, and has a build action to run
MakeSfxCa.
How does Visual Studio know where that DLL resides? It's not in the GAC and
ther
that deserves
attention? E-Mail Me
- Original Message
From: Gary Gocek
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Fri, August 6, 2010 8:02:15 PM
Subject: [WiX-users] Updating msiexec status window from custom action
Hi all, I work on a wix-based, C# .NET installer, currently targeting
Wi
Hi all, I work on a wix-based, C# .NET installer, currently targeting
Windows Server 2008 installs with msiexec v4 or greater. The installer
invokes a deferred custom action. This works as expected. Files are
deployed, custom action tasks are performed, errors result in a clean
rollback, etc.
Whil
22 matches
Mail list logo
