Add Payload elements under the MsiPackage element to manually add files
that are not described in the MSI file itself.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 6:09 AM, David L. Beckwith wrote:
>
> Bob Arnson-6 wrote:
> >
> > On 26-Oct-11 22:57, David L. Beckwith wrote:
> >> What is even weirder, is /layout pull
Please open a bug with as much information as possible. I'm not aware of
any issues but it is always possible a bug snuck in.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 8:18 AM, John L Krupka wrote:
> I am getting an install failure using a CertificateRef under a WebSite
> element. This works fine under 3.5 but is
Hello,
I am only 2 weeks into learning WIX and haven't done much beyond the
installer stuff that comes canned in VS so bear with me. I was confronted
with a challenge at work concerning an upgrade package that is simply
refusing to replace a file. The guy who normally builds it insists he has
t
Hi, we have a .MSI created with Wix 3.5 which seems to work well for US
computers. However, someone in Taiwan tried installing it from our intranet
and received this error message box :
"This installation package could not be opened. Verify that the package exists
and is accessible, or contact
I have a text file that has been modified in a folder under ProgramData.
When doing an upgrade I need to keep the file
If the file exists I'd like to take a copy of it to a temp location,
Perform the upgrade and then copy the file back.
How can I do this?
--
unsubscribe
-Original Message-
From: John L Krupka [mailto:john.kru...@nmwco.com]
Sent: 31 октября 2011 г. 19:19
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [WiX-users] CertificateRef in the 3.6 beta fails
I am getting an install failure using a CertificateRef under a WebSite element.
I am getting an install failure using a CertificateRef under a WebSite
element. This works fine under 3.5 but is failing under the 3.6 beta. If I
comment out the CertificateRef element, the install succeeds. The self
signed certificate which gets created earlier is getting added to the store.
Bob Arnson-6 wrote:
>
> On 26-Oct-11 22:57, David L. Beckwith wrote:
>> What is even weirder, is /layout pulls them out in the correct folder.
>> They also show up in the ProgramData\Package Cache\GUID folder just fine.
>
> If Burn's putting them in the same relative place as they were
> orig
Hi,
When will the next (weekly release?) version appear on Codeplex? Is the given
date/time always corrected when a new version is put on Codeplex? And is it
possible to mention a buildnumber of the beta available?
Best regards,
Albert van Peppen
Senior System Engineer
Insad Grafisch b.v.
--
9 matches
Mail list logo
