> On 30 Sep 2015, at 02:34, Gerald Combs wrote:
>
> Unless anyone has any objections I'd like to create the Wireshark
> master-2.0 branch this upcoming Monday, October 5 followed by the 2.0rc1
> release in mid to late October.
>
> The big, obvious change for 2.0 will be the new UI. As the page
Hi Pascal,
thanks for finding and fixing it! Can you cherry pick it also for 2.0?
Best regards
Michael
> On 06 Oct 2015, at 23:31, Wireshark code review
> wrote:
>
> URL:
> https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;h=a37ac98c5eb5c44794ca36418f93e7ed1c3e0af5
> Submitter
> On 07 Oct 2015, at 09:22, Pascal Quantin wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> 2015-10-07 8:41 GMT+02:00 Michael Tuexen :
> Hi Pascal,
>
> thanks for finding and fixing it! Can you cherry pick it also for 2.0?
>
> You are welcome :)
> I did not cherry-pick it because
> On 12 Jun 2016, at 07:11, Jeff Morriss wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2016, at 5:03 PM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
>
> > Well, it's surprising it was added (again) the analyze.
> >
> > Historically all items in Telephony were in Analyze, which became
> On 10. Mar 2018, at 06:16, Jaap Keuter wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
> While digging into https://ask.wireshark.org/question/2023 I stumbled up
> these entries in my file system
>
> macOS:~ jaap$ cd /Library/Application\ Support/
> macOS:Application Support jaap$ ls -la
> total 0
> ...
> drwxr-xr-x
> On 23. Feb 2019, at 10:32, Jaap Keuter wrote:
>
>
>> On 16 Feb 2019, at 20:38, Gerald Combs wrote:
>>
>> We recently switched to a new macOS builder. libssh required a special
>> workaround when building the application bundle on the old builder, and it
>> requires a slightly different wor
> On 24. Feb 2019, at 12:25, Jaap Keuter wrote:
>
>
>> On 23 Feb 2019, at 11:33, Michael Tuexen
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 23. Feb 2019, at 10:32, Jaap Keuter wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 16 Feb 2019, at 20:38, Gerald Combs wro
> On 28. Oct 2019, at 18:20, Bob Hinden wrote:
>
> https://buildbot.wireshark.org/wireshark-master/grid
>
> Anyone working on fixing this?
Isn't it fixed in
https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/34881/
Best regards
Michael
>
> Thanks,
> Bob
>
>
> _
> On 7. Nov 2019, at 06:29, Jim Young wrote:
>
> The macOS buildbot has been down since Nov 04 17:31.
>
> https://buildbot.wireshark.org/wireshark-master/builders/macOS%2010.14%20x64
>
> Is this intentional?
No. I just restart them.
Thanks for reporting.
Best regards
Michael
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> On 21. Mar 2020, at 23:10, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
>
> Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers wrote:
>> Currently, on GitHub, there's a "pcapng" team:
>> https://github.com/pcapng
>
>> with one repository containing the pcapng specification, and a
>> "the-tcpdump-group" team:
>
>> https://gith
> On 27. May 2020, at 22:33, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On May 27, 2020, at 1:22 PM, Juanjo Martin Carrascosa wrote:
>
>> A colleague is trying to build the latest Wireshark in High Sierra and he is
>> facing lots of problems. He built it very smoothly for Mojave.
>>
>> Which release tag or versio
> On 6. Dec 2020, at 18:25, John Thacker wrote:
>
> From what I can see from the MacOS buildbot's CMake logs (e.g.
> https://buildbot.wireshark.org/wireshark-master/builders/macOS%2010.14%20x64/builds/811/steps/compile_2/logs/stdio),
> it doesn't seem to have any of the support library updates
> On 20. Dec 2020, at 12:59, Jaap Keuter wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Not that it bothers me too much but I noticed (another) library mismatch in
> 3.4.2
Hi Jaap,
thanks for reporting.
>
> tools/macos_setup.sh sports ZLIB_VERSION=1.2.11, while About Wireshark
> (3.4.2) states “with zlib 1.2.8,”.
maco
> On 20. Dec 2020, at 20:34, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Dec 20, 2020, at 6:18 AM, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>
>>> On 20. Dec 2020, at 12:59, Jaap Keuter wrote:
>>>
>>> tools/macos_setup.sh sports ZLIB_VERSION=1.2.11, while About Wireshark
>>> (3.4
> On 16. Aug 2021, at 18:57, Evan Huus wrote:
>
> I've been poking at the bug in
> https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/issues/15584 but I've hit the
> limit of what I can glean from the SCTP RFC on reassembly. If anybody
> is familiar with the protocol and could provide some guidance as to
>
On Jul 7, 2013, at 7:52 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Jun 25, 2013, at 12:23 PM, Michael Tuexen
> wrote:
>
>> All support libs were build after the system was reinstalled.
>
> What versions of GLib, Pango, ATK, Cairo, and GTK+ were on the system when it
> wa
On Jul 9, 2013, at 11:37 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
>> Right now, I'm trying to figure out how to break the dependency circle
>> between GLib 2.16.3 and pkg-config 0.28; it may involve going with an older
>> version of pkg-config if building fo
On Jul 11, 2013, at 5:12 PM, buildbot-no-re...@wireshark.org wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder OSX-10.5-x86 while
> building Wireshark (development).
> Full details are available at:
> http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/6154
>
> Buildbot UR
\On Jul 14, 2013, at 7:03 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Jul 14, 2013, at 5:39 AM, tue...@wireshark.org wrote:
>
>> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=50576
>>
>> User: tuexen
>> Date: 2013/07/14 05:39 AM
>>
>> Log:
>> Don't use compiler options not supported by c
On Jul 21, 2013, at 2:53 PM, jma...@wireshark.org wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=50749
>
> User: jmayer
> Date: 2013/07/21 05:53 AM
>
> Log:
> Don't check for "APPLE" if what you really mean is "clang"
Except for this doesn't work. At least on Mac OS X
On Jul 21, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 03:41:52PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>> On Jul 21, 2013, at 2:53 PM, jma...@wireshark.org wrote:
>>
>>> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=50749
>>>
e in the code */
/* #undef YYTEXT_POINTER */
/* _U_ isn't needed for C++, simply don't name the variable.
However, we do need it for some headers that are shared between C and C++. */
#define _U_
[mba:wireshark/trunk/build] tuexen%
So: It doesn't work. Is there a wa
On Jul 21, 2013, at 7:06 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 06:45:11PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>> [mba:wireshark/trunk/build] tuexen% clang --version
>> Apple LLVM version 4.2 (clang-425.0.28) (based on LLVM 3.2svn)
>> Target
On Jul 22, 2013, at 12:08 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 07:49:01PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>> .. not only testing. I'm using it. And it is bad to have all the
>> unused warnings, since then I don't detect bugs I would c
On Jul 23, 2013, at 9:09 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Jul 21, 2013, at 10:49 AM, Michael Tuexen
> wrote:
>
>> It reports:
>> C-Compiler: /usr/bin/cc
>>
>> That explains why it doesn't detect it as clang...
>
> Yes, you definitely must not
On Sep 14, 2013, at 1:31 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 01:07:29AM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote:
>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.devel/22203
>> which gives pretty much the history of this script. It was (more than)
>> inspired by
>> https://nplab.fh-muenster.de/
On Sep 16, 2013, at 1:18 PM, Francisco Sanchez wrote:
> Dear dev,
>
> My name is Francisco Sanchez. I'm a PhD who's trying to install Wireshark
> latest version in order to obtain the new releases. For that purposes,
> following your instructions at:
>
> http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_htm
On Sep 18, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:
> On 17 September 2013 22:51, Pascal Quantin wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> why not load directly the executable in Visual as described here:
> http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Tips ? It works pretty well and does
> not require an obsolete pro
On Oct 10, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Anders Broman wrote:
> Hi,
> If we in the UDP/TCP/(SCTP?) dissectors saved next dissector on the first pas
> in say per packet data we could avoid
> repeated calls to heuristic dissectors and port/conversation lookups making
> the second pas faster.
> Does any one
On Oct 24, 2013, at 4:39 PM, mman...@netscape.net wrote:
> I only tried to remove it in ui/sctp_stat.c, not the .h file (if it exists
> there too) and it didn't work. ui/sctp_stat.c still
> includes other ui/gtk/ header files, so I'm guessing the dependency is still
> there.
Irene will look int
On Dec 5, 2013, at 9:42 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Dec 5, 2013, at 12:27 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
>
>> On 12/1/13 9:21 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:
>>>
>>> BTW, why is OSX using such an ancient version of Python. I believe only
>>> 2.7 and 3.3 are supported by the Python folks.
>>
>> As I reca
On Jan 9, 2014, at 4:22 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
> On 01/09/2014 07:40 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 05:09:11PM -0800, Gerald Combs wrote:
>>> On 1/7/14 4:19 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
Right now TCP packets with RST are marked as severity chat. Is there a
reason
why
On 02 Jul 2014, at 23:18, Evan Huus wrote:
> Currently we have Capture->Interfaces and Capture->Options which go to
> different tabs of the same dialogue. Makes sense to merge them into one entry?
Sounds good to me...
Best regards
Michael
> __
On 26 Jul 2014, at 20:39, Evan Huus wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Jan 14, 2012, at 6:40 AM, jma...@wireshark.org wrote:
>
> > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=40498
> >
> > User: jmayer
> > Date: 2012/01/14 06:40 AM
> >
> > L
On 28 Nov 2014, at 17:13, Peter Wu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I came across a duplicated piece of code by grepping for the string "DLT
> n" which I originally found in ui/gtk/capture_dlg.c. Two questions:
>
> - Can somebody reduce the duplication (two occurrences in
> ui/gtk/capture_dlg.c, one in ui/q
Gerald,
could you please copy this over to 0.99.5 tree? These are bugfixes which
improves the handling of some SCTP trace captured in real life
traces.
Best regards
Michael
On Jan 29, 2007, at 8:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=20
Hi Anders,
it has been completely implemented by a student of mine. I was
testing it
and did not want to commit it before the 0.99.5 release.
I'll commit it later today to the svn.
Please let me know if you find any bugs.
Best regards
Michael
On Feb 8, 2007, at 11:38 PM, Anders Broman wrote:
Hi Anders,
SCTP reassembly support from Robin Seggelmann has been added
in revision 20756.
Best regards
Michael
On Feb 8, 2007, at 11:38 PM, Anders Broman wrote:
> Hi,
> Has anybody done something about SCTP reassembly? I think something
> was mentioned on the list a while back but nothing look
Question in-line.
Best regards
Michael
On Feb 12, 2007, at 3:39 PM, Gerhard Gappmeier wrote:
>
>> In fact it should be used like:
>>
>> void method(int foo _U_)
>>
>> which should become
>>
>> void method(int foo __attribute__((unused)))
>>
>> I'm not sure if _U_ is implemented for anything othe
Hi Luis,
see my comments in-line.
Best regards
Michael
On Feb 13, 2007, at 2:14 PM, Luis Ontanon wrote:
> I need to implement the identification of retransmitted packets and
> calculation of RTT to the sctp dissector.
>
> - Is someone already working on this?
I recently committed code for SCTP
, you have to track each TSN. Have a look at the packet-sctp.c
reassembly code and also at the GUI stuff in gtk/ subdirs, where
also all associations are tracked.
>
> Thanks Again,
> Luis
>
> On 2/13/07, Michael Tuexen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Luis,
>>
>>
Dear all,
on a Mac OS X 10.4 system make fails with
Making all in agentx
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=link gcc -DINET6 -no-cpp-precomp -
D_U_="__attribute__((unused))" -Wall -Wpointer-arith -W -g -O2 -I/
usr/local/include -pthreads -I/usr/local/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/local/
lib/gtk-2.0/inclu
On Feb 19, 2007, at 12:46 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
> Michael Tuexen wrote:
>
>> on a Mac OS X 10.4 system make fails with
>
> ...
>
>> So why is /usr/local/lib/libwireshark.0.0.1.dylib referenced
>> explicitly?
>
> I don't know - I tried moving m
Hi Ulf,
just to be clear:
The sender is allowed to send 1 byte more than the rwnd allows.
This is used for zero window probing.
The receiver has a rwnd which he uses to accept data or not.
But he is free to advertise less, for example for SWS avoidance.
This is what you experience: the receiver a
On Feb 20, 2007, at 9:34 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Michael Tuexen wrote:
>> Hi Ulf,
>>
>> just to be clear:
>> The sender is allowed to send 1 byte more than the rwnd allows.
>> This is used for zero window probing.
>>
> Yes, your remarks sounds reasona
Hi Lego,
I'm wondering how you tie together both directions of an SCTP
association?
Best regards
Michael
On Feb 23, 2007, at 8:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=20908
>
> User: lego
> Date: 2007/02/23 08:57 PM
>
> Log:
> fix so
trace. The BSD stack (which runs on
Mac OS X) has a socket option to set the Initial TSN for debugging
>
> As per Association Restart I do not think I'll ever implement it, I'll
> treat the restarted Association as a new one (I need traces for this
> too, but this given sla
ess_list, dst_address_list
You need the V-tag, because it gives you one "half"-association without
knowing the addresses. You need the addresses to tie both
"half"associations
together, which you need because you have to relate the DATA chunks to
the SACK chunks.
> Lu
est is not working, it is better to do something which is possibly
wrong,
than to do nothing.
> on the other hand for all traces I have TSN values are different (by
> far) for every direction on every association.
>
> Is there any reason why this should not work?
>
> n 2/24/07,
On Feb 28, 2007, at 2:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=20947
>
> User: lego
> Date: 2007/02/28 02:09 PM
>
> Log:
> SCTP TSN analysis part 1.
>
> Up and running.
> As it is analysis will stop at TSN rollover (0x->0x000
What about calling it SS7/SIGTRAN ?
Best regards
Michael
On Mar 26, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> I finally had a chance to look at the new feature from revision 21066:
>
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.py?view=rev&revision=21066
>
> and see what it looks lik
Hi Bhavani,
not sure what you want to achieve. The parameter is defined as a
character string
and is displayed as a string. So you can not analyze more. And it
should be pretty
readable right now. From an SUA implementation point of view, you can
not assume
that the receiver does anything wi
predefined
> format.
> Is it possible? How can I do that?
>
> Regards,
> Bhavani
>
>
> From: Michael Tuexen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 18:19:12 +0200
>
> Hi Bhavani,
> not sure what you want to achieve. The parameter is defined as a
> c
Hi Steve,
It is an "old" dual G5 PowerMac, 2.5 GHz, and 2.5 GB RAM. running
Mac OS X 10.4.9/PPC.
Best regards
Michael
On May 23, 2007, at 1:08 AM, Stephen Fisher wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 03:11:18PM -0700, Gerald Combs wrote:
>
>> Thanks to Michael Tuexen, we onc
Dear all,
is there any reason why the V5UA plugin does not use the IANA registered
port 5675, but 10001? The code just says:
/* In RFC specification the SCTP registered User Port Number
Assignment for V5UA is 5675 */
/* #define SCTP_PORT_V5UA 5675 */
#define SCTP_PORT_V5UA 10001
If
OK, sounds good. I'll change that.
Best regards
Michael
On May 29, 2007, at 10:04 PM, Luis Ontanon wrote:
> On 5/29/07, Stephen Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 07:59:59AM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>>
>>> is there any reason w
Hi Michael,
checked in Revision 22041. Thanks for the code.
Best regards
Michael
On Jun 3, 2007, at 2:28 PM, Michael Scharf wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> please find enclosed modified IP and TCP dissectors that handle the
> "Quick-Start" TCP extension. Quick-Start is an experimental TCP addon
> recently
Could you send your isus.txt file?
Best regards
Michael
On Sep 6, 2007, at 9:07 AM, Varuna De Silva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The lowest level of my SS7 frame is MTP2 and the highest is ISUP.
>
> I was able to run text2pcap - l 140 to get it with a MTP2 header.
> But I Still have the
> problem of text2
Hi Ulf,
a question inline...
Best regards
Michael
On Oct 9, 2007, at 8:50 AM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Hi List!
>
> I had a look at the tshark buildbot test problems and found two things
> that are currently not working as before. But let me shortly explain
> what's going on "under the hood" with th
Ah, I see. I agree.
Best regards
Michael
On Oct 9, 2007, at 9:35 AM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Michael Tuexen schrieb:
>> What is a read filter?
> A not so well known feature ;-)
>
> Read filters are using the same syntax as display filters (and
> therefore
> the whole com
Hi Jeff,
see my comments in-line.
Best regards
Michael
On Nov 16, 2007, at 11:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=23471
>
> User: morriss
> Date: 2007/11/16 10:04 PM
>
> Log:
> When reassembly is off, catch ReportedBoundsError when
Hi Jeff,
see my comments in-line.
Best regards
Michael
On Nov 19, 2007, at 4:50 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
>
>
> Michael Tuexen wrote:
>> On Nov 16, 2007, at 11:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> (One could rightfully argue that you should only see a fragmented
>>&g
Dear all,
I'm setting up a Mac OS X 10.5.1 Intel MacBook Pro using
X11.app 2.1.1.
I have installed:
- PKG-Config 0.22
- GU gettext 0.17
- Cairo 1.4.12
- GLib 2.14.4
- GTK 2.12.3
- Pango 1.18
- ATK 1.9.1
After that I checked out the current svn version of Wireshark
and build it. It run and does n
added GTK 2.12 for windows I had to rearange some things look
> at:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.py/trunk/Makefile.nmake?r1=22934&r2=22955
>
> perhaps that'd help?
> Regards
> Anders
>
>
>
> Från: [EMAIL PROTE
rs are taken from GTK stock. It is these stock
> items
> that are missing.
> The libraries you list are the run time libraries. Aren't there
> corresponding development libraries for Mac OS X that need to be
> installed?
>
> Thanx,
> Jaap
>
> Michael Tuexen wrot
stock. It is these stock
> items
> that are missing.
> The libraries you list are the run time libraries. Aren't there
> corresponding development libraries for Mac OS X that need to be
> installed?
>
> Thanx,
> Jaap
>
> Michael Tuexen wrote:
>> Dear all,
Hi Andreas,
did up upgrade to
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/xquartz
which fixes a number of bugs and especially some
which show up when using wireshark?
I was able to successfully build wireshark with
the latest gtk/glib stuff. Everything works fine
except for the stock icons...
Best regar
On Jan 3, 2008, at 9:01 PM, Andreas Fink wrote:
>
> On 03.01.2008, at 20:40, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> did up upgrade to
>> http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/xquartz
>> which fixes a number of bugs and especially some
>> which
On Jan 3, 2008, at 9:54 PM, Andreas Fink wrote:
>>>
I was able to successfully build wireshark with
the latest gtk/glib stuff. Everything works fine
except for the stock icons...
>>>
>>> I dont know which Icons you refer to but on my Mac i'm not missing
>>> any...
>> Hmmm. The New,
Dear all,
I have been looking into the failures of the Mac OS X buildbot
failures...
Until 4 hour ago they were cause by the fact that the buildbot did not
have glib-1.2.10 and gtk-1.2.10 installed, I have fixed this.
I can build manually on that machine the svn repository with the --
disable
Just a correction of my earlier mail...
The current svn version does not compile, but an old version did.
However, the buildslave can not get the sources in time to start
the compile phase.
Best regards
Michael
On Feb 29, 2008, at 2:58 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a
Hi Sake,
what is the notion of 'error'? A zero window is completely valid and
happens if flow control kicks in...
I'm asking because I'm planing to add expert info to SCTP and it
should be consistent across dissectors.
Best regards
Michael
On Apr 5, 2008, at 10:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
Same problem on Mac OS X, see the buildbot output...
Best regards
Michael
On May 23, 2008, at 1:27 PM, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> why did you remote wireshark-tap-register.c
> from the makefile?
> wireshark doesnt build under linux without this file.
>
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:55 PM, <[EMAIL
wireshark isn't built anymore... at least on Mac OS X.
Best regards
Michael
On Jul 22, 2011, at 7:03 AM, jma...@wireshark.org wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=38162
>
> User: jmayer
> Date: 2011/07/21 10:03 PM
>
> Log:
> Missed gtk_orientable_set_orienta
On Aug 5, 2011, at 9:28 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Aug 5, 2011, at 12:10 AM, tue...@wireshark.org wrote:
>
>> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=38349
>>
>> User: tuexen
>> Date: 2011/08/05 12:10 AM
>>
>> Log:
>> Generate the capure sync pipe correctly.
>> Fix o
On Aug 5, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> I just tried to "fix" the stuff in main_welcome.c:
>
> Index: main_welcome.c
> ===
> --- main_welcome.c (revision 38365)
> +++ main_welcome.c (working copy)
> @@ -72,6 +72,9
On Aug 5, 2011, at 11:20 AM, Stig Bjørlykke wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 9:19 AM, wrote:
>> Log:
>> Add support for multiple interfaces to the capture options dialog.
>
> Really nice!
Hi Stig,
thank you... Comments are really welcome.
See my comments in-line.
Best regards
Michael
>
> So
On Aug 5, 2011, at 11:36 AM, Stig Bjørlykke wrote:
> And some more comments:
>
> * "Capture packets in monitor mode" is enabled for devices not supporting
> this.
If there is a way to figure out if it is supported, we should handle that
correctly,
I agree.
> * When manually selecting all interf
On Aug 6, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some questions regarding the following code inside the function
> select_if_type_cb:
>
> #if GTK_CHECK_VERSION(2,6,0)
> if (new_iftype == num_remote + 4)
> #else
> if (new_iftype == num_remote + 2)
> #endif
>
> What's
On Aug 6, 2011, at 12:27 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> There are two problems:
> 1) Some functions are defined but not used in my configuration.
> 2) The else without previous if error. If I #undefine HAVE_PCAP_CREATE, the
> compile succeeds. Maybe a compiler bug?
> Note: On my Linux system both HAV
On Aug 6, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 02:42:00PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>> No, not a bug in the compiler, a bug in the code. I checked in a fix in
>> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=38375
>
&g
On Aug 6, 2011, at 9:48 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 07:39:57PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>> from what I could see is that the functions (I #if 0 out) are never called.
>> I just wanted to keep the code if it turns out that it is ne
On Aug 16, 2011, at 12:14 PM, Stig Bjørlykke wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:03 PM, wrote:
>> Log:
>> Using enabled/disabled instead of yes/no seems to be more descriptive.
>
> Or maybe a checkbox? Which you can click to toggle the setting?
The (current) concept is that the capture option
On Aug 18, 2011, at 10:46 PM, Stephen Fisher wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:30:40PM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote:
>
>> I'd rather disable building with AIRPCAP. If this code is unmaintained
>> then this would be more appropriate.
>
> That code (should be) maintained like the rest of our regul
On Oct 20, 2011, at 8:53 PM, Stig Bjørlykke wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:17 PM, wrote:
>> Log:
>> This patch does not provide any new functionality, [...]
>
> Try hiding the first interface in the interface list and double click
> an interface in the welcome page or in the capture option
On Oct 20, 2011, at 9:39 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Oct 20, 2011, at 11:17 AM, tue...@wireshark.org wrote:
>
>> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=39495
>>
>> User: tuexen
>> Date: 2011/10/20 11:17 AM
>
> The build broke on platforms where libpcap doesn't have t
On Dec 30, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> Just a question I've been toying with:
> Would it be ok/make sense to move the official builds on OSX from GTK2 to
> GTK3?
Depends on:
* Does GTK3 compile? For GTK2 we need some patches?
* Is it stable for releases?
I haven't tried it yet?
Best r
On Jan 1, 2012, at 11:25 PM, Dirk Jagdmann wrote:
>> Configuring, building and installing takes ~45 seconds on my system. Add to
>> this
>> a 1 MB download. So if there are no objections, I'll leave it as is (and
>> check
>> whether other packages also come in .xz format). Otherwise I'll change
On Jan 2, 2012, at 3:53 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Jan 1, 2012, at 3:00 PM, Martin Kaiser wrote:
>
>> In a pcapng file, does the string stored in an opt_comment option have
>> to be 0-terminated? I couldn't find anything explicit about this in the
>> specification. Pcapng options have a length
On Jan 10, 2012, at 8:31 AM, vijay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to capture from multiple interfaces simultaneously. Wireshark captures
> from a pipe and eth1 separately but when i try them
> togather using wireshark -k -i /tmp/pipe -i eth1 it displays some dumpcap
> usage error.
>
> unknown messa
On Jan 25, 2012, at 5:16 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
> On 1/25/2012 8:04 AM, tue...@wireshark.org wrote:
>> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=40715
>
> capture_if_dlg.c: In function ‘store_selected’:
> capture_if_dlg.c:168:12: warning: variable ‘found’ set but not used
>
Hi Joerg,
first of all: Thank you very much for providing the notes.
Some comments in-line.
Best regards
Michael
On Feb 3, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> As some people met in Brussels on the eve of FOSDEM and talked about
> Wireshark,
> here are some notes on what was talked about. We
On Mar 1, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
> The 10.5-x86 and 10.5-ppc MacOS buildbots currently fail to compile the
> current SVN with these warnings:
>
>> packet-noe.c: In function 'decode_utf8':
>> packet-noe.c:805: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type
>> packet-noe.c:8
What is the reason to use Airpcap by default?
It is (as far as I know) only supported on Windows platforms, when having some
software installed. So why compile the stuff on non windows platforms?
Best regards
Michael
On Mar 27, 2012, at 4:37 AM, morr...@wireshark.org wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wires
would make sense to have the Airpcap stuff on by default on
Windows,
and off by default on other platforms. We can leave support in for switching
them on,
as this might help during development.
Best regards
Michael
>
> Michael Tuexen wrote:
>> What is the reason to use Airpcap by defa
Dear all,
I'm trying to fix
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7191
In a pcapng file, we report according to
http://www.winpcap.org/ntar/draft/PCAP-DumpFileFormat.html#sectionisb
isb_ifrecv: Number of packets received from the physical interface
starting from the beg
On Apr 25, 2012, at 8:51 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Apr 25, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>
>> However, we have no chance to report the packets dumpcap dropped.
>
> Where does dumpcap itself drop packets? Is this referring to the fact that,
> on some pla
On Apr 25, 2012, at 8:50 PM, Anders Broman wrote:
> Michael Tuexen skrev 2012-04-25 20:08:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I'm trying to fix
>>
>> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7191
>>
>>
>> In a pcapng file, we report ac
On Apr 25, 2012, at 9:28 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Apr 25, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>
>> When using threads, we run a thread for each source. Once the packet has
>> been read it is
>> stored in a queue.
>
> I'm assuming here that &qu
On Apr 25, 2012, at 11:07 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Apr 25, 2012, at 12:48 PM, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>
>> So it adds copying, but we did some measurements and if you make the queue
>> large, it can improve
>> the capturing, because you can store packets
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
