> On 16. Aug 2021, at 18:57, Evan Huus <eapa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've been poking at the bug in > https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/issues/15584 but I've hit the > limit of what I can glean from the SCTP RFC on reassembly. If anybody > is familiar with the protocol and could provide some guidance as to > the correct behaviour when given nested begin/end data fragments, that > would be helpful. It is a illegal sender behaviour. I can take a look at it (not right now), but I assigned the bug to me...
Best regards Michael > > Thanks, > Evan > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
