009 6:24 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] header field arrays
On Jun 18, 2009, at 3:11 PM, Jonathan Walker (c) wrote:
> It wasn't giving the specific error, which is why it was so hard to
> debug.
What non-specific error did it give? Did
On Jun 18, 2009, at 3:11 PM, Jonathan Walker (c) wrote:
> It wasn't giving the specific error, which is why it was so hard to
> debug.
What non-specific error did it give? Did it crash? If so, could you
get a stack trace?
> It's not causing me problems anymore though. I made the array in
ark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] header field arrays
On Jun 18, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Jonathan Walker (c) wrote:
>When creating and registering a new header field array in a plug-
> in, does the size of the array have to be exactly the same as the
> number of used fields?
No. This i
On Jun 18, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Jonathan Walker (c) wrote:
>When creating and registering a new header field array in a plug-
> in, does the size of the array have to be exactly the same as the
> number of used fields?
No. This is C, not PL/I :-), so if you pass an array (which really
mea
Hello all,
When creating and registering a new header field array in a plug-in, does
the size of the array have to be exactly the same as the number of used fields?
For example, I created a hf array as follows:
static hf_register_info hf[MAX_FIELDS];
I plan to fill up a certain variab
