Re: [Wireshark-dev] Two typos is wireshark manual

Nice catches Nan. I've submitted https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/34725/ and https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/34726/ for fixing repeated words in the WSUG and WSDG. I've also submitted https://code.wireshark.org/review/34727 to (hopefully) improve the opening sentences. Moshe On Mon,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Two typos is wireshark manual

On Oct 7, 2019, at 11:59 AM, Ross Jacobs wrote: > Thanks for reaching out to the dev mailing list! Typos in documentation are > bugs. Please submit them as such on Wireshark's bugzilla. The category should > be `main site - www.wireshark.org` as that is where the documentation is. The manuals

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Two typos is wireshark manual

Hi Nan, Thanks for reaching out to the dev mailing list! Typos in documentation are bugs. Please submit them as such on Wireshark's bugzilla . The category should be `main site - www.wireshark.org` as that is where the document

[Wireshark-dev] Two typos is wireshark manual

Hi Wireshark manual authors, Greeting from me! While reading Wireshark manual, I find maybe two typos: (1) Section 1.1 (https://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked/ChapterIntroduction.html#ChIntroWhatIs): > A network packet analyzer will try to capture network packets and tries to > displa