Kukosa, Tomas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as I know, G.722 has just expired patents and is freely available.
>
> The C source code could be found in ITU-T G.191
> http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.191/en
>
> I am not 100% sure about licencing if we can use this source code in
> Wireshark, it is why I have
Broman
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 6:09 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] G.722 payload export to .wav
Hi,
The problem with codecs is that they might be patented or
require licenses to use
: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] G.722 payload export to .wav
Would it make sense to hand this off to an external player, e.g. VLC? It
looks like you can feed it RTP data:
http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc/2007-March/014362.html
Anders Broman wrote:
>
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *umut orhan
> *Sent:* den 14 oktober 2008 16:54
> *To:* wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> *Subject:* [Wireshark-dev] G.722 payload export to .wav
>
> Hi all,
>
> I hope that this is the right discussion list and sorry for possible
> inconvenie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of umut orhan
Sent: den 14 oktober 2008 16:54
To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] G.722 payload export to .wav
Hi all,
I hope that this is the right discussion list and sorry for possible
inconveniences in advance.
I wonder whether the G.722 t
Hi all,
I hope that this is the right discussion list and sorry for possible
inconveniences in advance.
I wonder whether the G.722 to .wav exporting is handled within the current
wireshark release or is planned to be handled in near future. If not, do you
think that a plugin or a feature for t
