Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compilation error Red Hat 3.4.3-9.EL4

2017-06-27 Thread Jakub Zawadzki
Hello, W dniu 2017-06-27 05:33, Guy Harris napisaƂ(a): On Apr 29, 2011, at 12:52 AM, Jakub Zawadzki wrote: On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:24:08PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote: I wouldn't to it by checking for a particular version, though - I'd just check for inflatePrime() and, if it's not present,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compilation error Red Hat 3.4.3-9.EL4

2017-06-26 Thread Guy Harris
On Apr 29, 2011, at 12:52 AM, Jakub Zawadzki wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:24:08PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote: >> I wouldn't to it by checking for a particular version, though - >> I'd just check for inflatePrime() and, if it's not present, don't build in >> the "transparent access to gzippe

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compilation error Red Hat 3.4.3-9.EL4

2011-04-29 Thread Jakub Zawadzki
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 02:30:37PM -0400, Jeff Morriss wrote: > Jeff Morriss wrote: > > Done in rev 36954. > > cmake should be done in rev 36956. Thanks! ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:http://www.wi

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compilation error Red Hat 3.4.3-9.EL4

2011-04-29 Thread Jeff Morriss
Jeff Morriss wrote: Jakub Zawadzki wrote: Hi, On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:06:23AM +0200, Anders Broman wrote: It's not a big problem on Windows Ok, but we need at least to define HAVE_INFLATEPRIME (and we can remove HAVE_GZCLEARERR). If you know how I'd be grateful ;) Done in rev 36954.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compilation error Red Hat 3.4.3-9.EL4

2011-04-29 Thread Jeff Morriss
Jakub Zawadzki wrote: Hi, On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:06:23AM +0200, Anders Broman wrote: It's not a big problem on Windows Ok, but we need at least to define HAVE_INFLATEPRIME (and we can remove HAVE_GZCLEARERR). If you know how I'd be grateful ;) Done in rev 36954. Still to do: cmake. __

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compilation error Red Hat 3.4.3-9.EL4

2011-04-29 Thread Marc Milgram
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:36 +0200, "Jakub Zawadzki" wrote: > Btw. from zlib page: > Version 1.2.3 (July 2005) eliminates potential security vulnerabilities > in zlib 1.2.1 and 1.2.2, so all users of those versions should > ***upgrade immediately*** > > So maybe it's good (read: safer for us

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compilation error Red Hat 3.4.3-9.EL4

2011-04-29 Thread Jakub Zawadzki
Hi, On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:06:23AM +0200, Anders Broman wrote: > It's not a big problem on Windows Ok, but we need at least to define HAVE_INFLATEPRIME (and we can remove HAVE_GZCLEARERR). If you know how I'd be grateful ;)

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compilation error Red Hat 3.4.3-9.EL4

2011-04-29 Thread Jakub Zawadzki
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:55:34AM -0700, Guy Harris wrote: > On Apr 29, 2011, at 12:52 AM, Jakub Zawadzki wrote: > > > Actually we still can do transparent access, but only when BLOCK is not > > inside > > middle of byte. > > Does that mean "we can still do fast random access to all gzipped fil

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compilation error Red Hat 3.4.3-9.EL4

2011-04-29 Thread Anders Broman
-Original Message- From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Zawadzki Sent: den 29 april 2011 09:52 To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compilation error Red Hat 3.4.3-9.EL4 On Thu, Apr

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compilation error Red Hat 3.4.3-9.EL4

2011-04-29 Thread Guy Harris
On Apr 29, 2011, at 12:52 AM, Jakub Zawadzki wrote: > Actually we still can do transparent access, but only when BLOCK is not inside > middle of byte. Does that mean "we can still do fast random access to all gzipped files, but we have to change the way we choose when to start a new block", or

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compilation error Red Hat 3.4.3-9.EL4

2011-04-29 Thread Jakub Zawadzki
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:24:08PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote: > I wouldn't to it by checking for a particular version, though - > I'd just check for inflatePrime() and, if it's not present, don't build in > the "transparent access to gzipped files" support. Actually we still can do transparent acc

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compilation error Red Hat 3.4.3-9.EL4

2011-04-29 Thread Anders Broman
-Original Message- From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Guy Harris Sent: den 29 april 2011 08:24 To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compilation error Red Hat 3.4.3-9.EL4 On Apr 28, 2011

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compilation error Red Hat 3.4.3-9.EL4

2011-04-28 Thread Guy Harris
On Apr 28, 2011, at 11:19 PM, Anders Broman wrote: > So we should require at least 1.2.2.4 then? It's 6 years old after all. I would not mind. I wouldn't to it by checking for a particular version, though - I'd just check for inflatePrime() and, if it's not present, don't build in the "transp

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compilation error Red Hat 3.4.3-9.EL4

2011-04-28 Thread Anders Broman
Guy Harris skrev 2011-04-29 08:05: On Apr 28, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Anders Broman wrote: It seems like Wireshark no longer compiles if zlib is 1.2.1: file_wrappers.c: In function `file_seek': file_wrappers.c:893: warning: implicit declaration of function `inflatePrime' make: *** [libwiretap_la-fi

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Compilation error Red Hat 3.4.3-9.EL4

2011-04-28 Thread Guy Harris
On Apr 28, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Anders Broman wrote: > It seems like Wireshark no longer compiles if zlib is 1.2.1: > > file_wrappers.c: In function `file_seek': > file_wrappers.c:893: warning: implicit declaration of function `inflatePrime' > make: *** [libwiretap_la-file_wrappers.lo] Error 1 >

[Wireshark-dev] Compilation error Red Hat 3.4.3-9.EL4

2011-04-28 Thread Anders Broman
Hi, It seems like Wireshark no longer compiles if zlib is 1.2.1: file_wrappers.c: In function `file_seek': file_wrappers.c:893: warning: implicit declaration of function `inflatePrime' make: *** [libwiretap_la-file_wrappers.lo] Error 1 file_wrappers.c: 893: (void)inflatePrime(strm, here-