Guy Harris schrieb:
> On Jan 24, 2007, at 9:14 AM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
>
>> Any objections against this (in my eyes cleaner) solution?
>
> Somebody asked about this in 2004:
>
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/ethereal-dev/200405/msg06091.html
>
> but I'm not sure why, given the answer:
>
Jacques, Olivier (OpenCall Test Infra) schrieb:
>> Works fine for me, but then I don't have Cygwin on my normal
>> path. Do you?
>>
>
> No I don't have Cygwin in my path. Do you have Cygwin's "make" package
> installed? In this case, it works for me too if I don't have the make
> package fro
