Guy Harris schrieb: > On Jan 24, 2007, at 9:14 AM, Ulf Lamping wrote: > >> Any objections against this (in my eyes cleaner) solution? > > Somebody asked about this in 2004: > > http://www.wireshark.org/lists/ethereal-dev/200405/msg06091.html > > but I'm not sure why, given the answer: > > http://www.wireshark.org/lists/ethereal-dev/200405/msg06093.html > > that wasn't done. > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
At that time, I worked on getting rid of the old plugin api stuff. Creating a def file based on the files for the old plugin api stuff was quite easy. The solution with __declspec would have been the next step but it would have meant some extra work for me and I was satisfied with the def file solution. BTW, I'd like to thank all people who continue to contribute so much work and time to Wireshark. I wish I had some time left to work on Wireshark improvements and bugfixes. I still use Wireshark every day in my work and it is definitively the most valuable tool to me. BTW, finally I don't need to maintain a parallel installation of MSVC6 and MSVC2005 on my laptop anymore and can deinstall MSVC6. Thanks. Regards, Lars _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
