On 22 July 2015 at 22:13, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Jul 22, 2015, at 1:49 PM, Graham Bloice
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 22 July 2015 at 18:37, Guy Harris wrote:
> >
> >> On Jul 22, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Graham Bloice
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Most, if not all, will be running Wireshark unelevated, as this
Hello Yang,
From: Yang Luo , Date: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 11:12
PM
>I tested it against Win10 10240 x64 (French and Chinese), try installer
>at:
>https://svn.nmap.org/nmap-exp/yang/NPcap-LWF/npcap-nmap-0.02-r2.exe
I've continued to test the various Npcap versions in WinPcap API mode on
Wind
Hi Guy,
If I am understanding right, what you asked is exactly what Npcap has
implemented for "Admin-only Mode". If you install Npcap in "Admin-only
Mode", the driver npf.sys will be protected with Admin rights. Softwares
(like Wireshark) loading Npcap's packet.dll will start a daemon named
"NPcap
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 09:26:42PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
|
| On Jul 21, 2015, at 7:53 PM, Luke Mewburn wrote:
|
| > I've been experiencing weird issues running my Mac OS X builds of
| > wireshark compiled with Qt 5.2 from Homebrew.
Correcting myself: the Homebrew version is Qt 5.4.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Pascal Quantin
wrote:
>
>
> Indeed the command output is localized. Before installing Npcap, I have:
> État adminÉtat TypeNom de l'interface
> -
> Activé Conne
On Jul 22, 2015, at 1:49 PM, Graham Bloice wrote:
>
>
> On 22 July 2015 at 18:37, Guy Harris wrote:
>
>> On Jul 22, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Graham Bloice
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Most, if not all, will be running Wireshark unelevated, as this is a basic
>>> tenet of Wireshark use. There are millions o
On 22 July 2015 at 21:49, Graham Bloice wrote:
>
>
> On 22 July 2015 at 18:37, Guy Harris wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 22, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Graham Bloice
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Most, if not all, will be running Wireshark unelevated, as this is a
>> basic tenet of Wireshark use. There are millions of lines
On 22 July 2015 at 18:37, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Jul 22, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Graham Bloice
> wrote:
>
> > Most, if not all, will be running Wireshark unelevated, as this is a
> basic tenet of Wireshark use. There are millions of lines of code in
> Wireshark dissectors and they really shouldn't b
2015-07-22 18:25 GMT+02:00 Yang Luo :
> Hi Pascal,
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Pascal Quantin > wrote:
>
>>
>> I just gave a try to this new installer:
>> - still my rename issue of the loop back installer (as expected ;)). Is
>> there some debug log / test I could do on my side? I will
On Jul 22, 2015, at 5:44 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
> I send via SMTP through their servers (i.e., I don't use their web
> mail interface - I use IMAP and SMTP from a Mac mail client).
>
> OK fine , I'll use gmail for the mailing lists. But you really should
> try Yahoo mail sometime - you get a
On Jul 22, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:
> Most, if not all, will be running Wireshark unelevated, as this is a basic
> tenet of Wireshark use. There are millions of lines of code in Wireshark
> dissectors and they really shouldn't be given admin privs.
Does anybody know whether the
On 22 July 2015 at 17:25, Yang Luo wrote:
> - for those having User Account Control activated, you need to start
>> Wireshark as administrator (even without restricting Npcap to admin during
>> installation) to have the driver started. Unfortunate... If this is the
>> loopback adapter that trig
Hi Pascal,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Pascal Quantin
wrote:
>
> I just gave a try to this new installer:
> - still my rename issue of the loop back installer (as expected ;)). Is
> there some debug log / test I could do on my side? I will double check if
> the rename works fine on a Frenc
2015-07-22 6:45 GMT+02:00 Yang Luo :
>
> Hi all,
>
> I think I have completely solved the "System error 2" thing, this error
is because current Npcap uses WFP technique for handling loopback traffic
and WFP will cause the "System error 2" if it is started by OS from boot,
so I removed the "Automati
I send via SMTP through their servers (i.e., I don't use their web
mail interface - I use IMAP and SMTP from a Mac mail client).
OK fine , I'll use gmail for the mailing lists. But you really should
try Yahoo mail sometime - you get all kinds of amazing offers from
people you've never met before,
> On Jul 22, 2015, at 02:38, Martin Mathieson
> wrote:
>
> Got this, and didn't need to fish it out of spam this time (where is
> where your yahoo mails live for me).
Ya, something about the way you send from your yahoo account ruins the DKIM
header so most mail clients auto-spam them and ref
On 22 July 2015 at 07:59, Yang Luo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have found this link:
> https://www.osr.com/blog/2015/03/18/microsoft-signatures-required-km-drivers-windows-10/,
> in which it says: "*These requirements only apply to Windows 10 and
> later. In fact, Microsoft plans to offer a bit of a grac
Hi,
I have found this link:
https://www.osr.com/blog/2015/03/18/microsoft-signatures-required-km-drivers-windows-10/,
in which it says: "*These requirements only apply to Windows 10 and later.
In fact, Microsoft plans to offer a bit of a grace period: Drivers signed
before Windows 10 RTM will be a
18 matches
Mail list logo
