On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Mar 26, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Evan Huus wrote:
>
>> I'm not 100% convinced we should though - it would be more flexible,
>> but we'd be exposing some of the guts of the dissection backend into
>> 'userspace' as it were. Not a particular stron
On 3/26/2013 1:29 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
On Mar 26, 2013, at 5:40 AM, Bill Meier wrote:
I'm curious why you added the following test in the recent value_string.c patch
if (first_value > vs_p[i].value) {
g_warning("Extended value string %s forced to fall back to linear search: en
Hi,
Two questions:
1) Why move codec infrastructure into epan? I don't understand the rationale.
2) Why destroy the G729/G723 support? Even though it's not in there, they're
hooks for having it there.
Thanks,
Jaap
On 03/26/2013 02:14 PM, michal.labed...@tieto.com wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I want to
On Mar 26, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Evan Huus wrote:
> I'm not 100% convinced we should though - it would be more flexible,
> but we'd be exposing some of the guts of the dissection backend into
> 'userspace' as it were. Not a particular strong objection, but
> something to keep in mind.
I'm not sure
On Mar 26, 2013, at 5:40 AM, Bill Meier wrote:
> I'm curious why you added the following test in the recent value_string.c
> patch
>
> if (first_value > vs_p[i].value) {
>g_warning("Extended value string %s forced to fall back to linear
> search: entry %u, value %u < first entry,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Jakub Zawadzki
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 05:39:54PM +0100, David Arnold wrote:
>> Is there any enthusiasm for a BASE_CUSTOM64?
>
> I'd rather want some generic BASE_CUSTOM which pass to custom functiom
> fvalue_t (and maybe hf_index).
It looks like
On 25/03/2013, at 10:23 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
> On 03/17/13 11:58, David Arnold wrote:
<...>
>> My question then becomes one of consistency: should I do this for all my
>> BASE_CUSTOM cases? Or is there some advantage in using BASE_CUSTOM that
>> I've missed (beyond saving a couple of line
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 05:39:54PM +0100, David Arnold wrote:
> Is there any enthusiasm for a BASE_CUSTOM64?
I'd rather want some generic BASE_CUSTOM which pass to custom functiom fvalue_t
(and maybe hf_index).
Jakub.
_
Hi All,
I want to ask about how to add SBC codec support to RTP Player. SBC is codec
used by Bluetooth. There is GPL library for that (libsbc developed by BlueZ
developers).
I decided to move codecs to "epan" directory and small extend existing fine API
- my idea can be simply described in word
On 3/25/2013 8:37 PM, g...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=48555
User: guy
Date: 2013/03/25 05:37 PM
Guy;
I'm curious why you added the following test in the recent
value_string.c patch
if (first_value > vs_p[i].value) {
10 matches
Mail list logo
