Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 05:39:54PM +0100, David Arnold wrote: > Is there any enthusiasm for a BASE_CUSTOM64?
I'd rather want some generic BASE_CUSTOM which pass to custom functiom fvalue_t (and maybe hf_index). Jakub. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
