On Mar 23, 2013, at 1:00 PM, Ed Beroset wrote:
> One thing still puzzling me is the comment in the (now elided) code for
> pane_callback which says "repaint the comment area because when moving the
> pane position there are times that the expose_event_comments is not called."
> I can't see wh
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> On 03/23/2013 10:07 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
>> Am I correct in thinking that in packet-gsm_a_dtap.c around line 6432,
>> if match_strval_idx doesn't find a match then we will access invalid
>> memory because idx will be used as an array index with
On Mar 23, 2013, at 4:02 PM, Roland Knall wrote:
> Thanks for the script. Was what I was looking for. But, the thing is
> messed up. Fixated on static versions and download urls, for one
> thing. If something goes wrong during download, the whole process is
> started again. And doing the whole t
Hi
Thanks for the script. Was what I was looking for. But, the thing is
messed up. Fixated on static versions and download urls, for one
thing. If something goes wrong during download, the whole process is
started again. And doing the whole thing without macport is strictly
speaking a painful proc
On 03/23/2013 10:07 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
> Am I correct in thinking that in packet-gsm_a_dtap.c around line 6432,
> if match_strval_idx doesn't find a match then we will access invalid
> memory because idx will be used as an array index with value -1?
>
> Evan
Unless gsm_a_dtap_msg_cc_strings con
Am I correct in thinking that in packet-gsm_a_dtap.c around line 6432,
if match_strval_idx doesn't find a match then we will access invalid
memory because idx will be used as an array index with value -1?
Evan
___
Sent via:
Jaap Keuter wrote:
On 03/23/2013 12:58 AM, Ed Beroset wrote:
In working on fixing a bug today, I made a proposed change or two
to graph_analysis.c. See
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7418 for the
context. The first patch was a very conservative one that simply
added a bit
On Mar 23, 2013, at 7:51 AM, Roland Knall wrote:
> Can someone point me in the right direction on how to build wireshark
> successfully using Mountain Lion? So far I am failing spectacularly.
> Using MacPorts for the necessary libraries and dev-dependencies, and
> deactivating everything I can n
On 23/03/2013, at 3:51 PM, Roland Knall wrote:
> Can someone point me in the right direction on how to build wireshark
> successfully using Mountain Lion? So far I am failing spectacularly.
> Using MacPorts for the necessary libraries and dev-dependencies, and
> deactivating everything I can not c
Hi
Can someone point me in the right direction on how to build wireshark
successfully using Mountain Lion? So far I am failing spectacularly.
Using MacPorts for the necessary libraries and dev-dependencies, and
deactivating everything I can not compile (Airpcap amongst those)
I tried using cmake
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> On 03/23/2013 01:50 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
>>> On 03/22/2013 09:35 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
As proposed and discussed in bug #8467. Any objections?
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugz
On 03/23/2013 01:50 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
>> On 03/22/2013 09:35 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
>>> As proposed and discussed in bug #8467. Any objections?
>>>
>>> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8467
>>
>> Took some digging to find th
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> On 03/22/2013 09:35 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
>> As proposed and discussed in bug #8467. Any objections?
>>
>> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8467
>
> Took some digging to find the rationale here:
> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bu
On 03/23/2013 12:58 AM, Ed Beroset wrote:
> In working on fixing a bug today, I made a proposed change or two to
> graph_analysis.c. See
> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7418 for the context.
> The first patch was a very conservative one that simply added a bit of code
>
On 03/22/2013 09:35 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
> As proposed and discussed in bug #8467. Any objections?
>
> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8467
Took some digging to find the rationale here:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8461#c12
Besides what's written there,
Hi
I could act as backup as well, if no one else steps up. I will also amend
the wiki page today with my projects.
Kind regards,
Roland
Am Samstag, 23. März 2013 schrieb Alexis La Goutte :
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Gerald Combs
>
> > wrote:
>
>> Google has opened up applications
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
> Google has opened up applications for mentoring organizations fro GSoC
> 2013. In order to complete the application we need someone to act as a
> backup admin. Any volunteers? If so, please sign up at
> www.google-menlange.com and send me you
17 matches
Mail list logo
