On 03/22/2013 09:35 PM, Evan Huus wrote: > As proposed and discussed in bug #8467. Any objections? > > https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8467
Took some digging to find the rationale here: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8461#c12 Besides what's written there, don't forget about the *_ext interfaces here. Oh, and _all_ documentation / code samples, etc. I get the idea, but we're wondering into parser territory here. It might be a whole can-o-worms. Just my E0.02, Jaap ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
