On May 26, 2012, at 7:30 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
> I did (had to do ?) a complete rm config.cache, ./autogen.sh and ./configure
> sequence before doing make to get rid of the error.
I had a similar problem, but I didn't have to do "rm config.cache" - re-running
autogen.sh and configure was suff
On May 26, 2012, at 9:56 PM, Dipanjan Das wrote:
> I couldn't get you.
What I'm saying is that the "Starting point for a developer" mail message you
sent:
http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201205/msg00198.html
was the same as the "New developer - how to start?" mail message
On May 26, 2012, at 9:59 PM, Dipanjan Das wrote:
> I am yet keen to know who are the core Wireshark developers
As Evan Huus said in his response the previous time you asked these questions:
http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201205/msg00195.html
http://wiki.wireshark.org/Deve
Hi Aft,
I am yet keen to know who are the core Wireshark developers & if there is
any way to find out the commits made by any one of the community developers.
On 27 May 2012 04:09, Aft nix wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
> >
> > On May 25, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Dipanja
Hi Harris,
I couldn't get you.
On 27 May 2012 03:43, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On May 25, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Dipanjan Das wrote:
>
> > I want to get myself involved in the development of Wireshark. Can
> anybody please let me know about the following:
> > • Is there anywhere I need to get mys
Hi folks,
I have noticed that there are some undissected bytes when I look at
NTCreate&X response, and I guess I have to accept the blame for that.
However, when I look at the code in Samba
(source3/nttrans.c:reply_ntcreate_and_X I see the following:
SOFF_T(p, 0, SMB_VFS_GET_ALLOC_SIZE(co
On 5/26/2012 7:40 PM, Akos Vandra wrote:
On 27 May 2012 01:18, Pascal Quantin wrote:
Le 27 mai 2012 à 01:12, Akos Vandra a écrit :
Sorry, I forgot to mention: I am running ubuntu 10.10, x64 version.
On 27 May 2012 01:05, Akos Vandra wrote:
Hi!
I'm developing a few dissectors for socketca
Hi folks,
Following on from my 'experiments' with piping pcap-ng captures into
Wireshark, I realized that that is not what I wanted to do.
There are cases where one has a packet capture application that would
like to pump (or pimp) packet captures into Wireshark.
The attached patch allows:
1. A
Okay, after trying to buld revisions 42000, 42500, 42700, 42800,
42750, 42725, 42712, 42706, 40709, 42708, 420707, I narrowed it down
to some change between revisions 42706 and 42707 (42706 builds fine,
42707 gives the aforementioned error).
Can someone please check what was that change? I've litt
Nope, make distclean also fails for the same reason... :)
Regards,
Ákos
On 27 May 2012 01:18, Pascal Quantin wrote:
> Le 27 mai 2012 à 01:12, Akos Vandra a écrit :
>
>> Sorry, I forgot to mention: I am running ubuntu 10.10, x64 version.
>>
>> On 27 May 2012 01:05, Akos Vandra wrote:
>>> Hi!
Le 27 mai 2012 à 01:12, Akos Vandra a écrit :
> Sorry, I forgot to mention: I am running ubuntu 10.10, x64 version.
>
> On 27 May 2012 01:05, Akos Vandra wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'm developing a few dissectors for socketcan. They were working fine,
>> until I decided to update to SVN head.
>> Now
Sorry, I forgot to mention: I am running ubuntu 10.10, x64 version.
On 27 May 2012 01:05, Akos Vandra wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm developing a few dissectors for socketcan. They were working fine,
> until I decided to update to SVN head.
> Now during the build I get:
>
> Making all in dissectors
> make[
Hi!
I'm developing a few dissectors for socketcan. They were working fine,
until I decided to update to SVN head.
Now during the build I get:
Making all in dissectors
make[3]: Entering directory
`/home/akos/projects/c/wireshark/wireshark/epan/dissectors'
make[3]: *** No rule to make target `Custo
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On May 25, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Dipanjan Das wrote:
>
>> I want to get myself involved in the development of Wireshark. Can anybody
>> please let me know about the following:
>
> They can, and they did, answer at least the first question the
On May 25, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Dipanjan Das wrote:
> I want to get myself involved in the development of Wireshark. Can anybody
> please let me know about the following:
> • Is there anywhere I need to get myself registered as a developer?
> • How are the tasks splitted across?
>
Exactly! Great, I'll figure out to submit it based on that bug.
Thanks for the nudge in the right direction.
Paul Teeter
ptee...@gmail.com
Sent from my iPhone
On May 26, 2012, at 11:51 AM, "mman...@netscape.net"
wrote:
I assume you're refering to
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c
I assume you're refering to
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3760
Of course any help/patches would be appreciated.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Teeter
To: wireshark-dev
Sent: Sat, May 26, 2012 1:53 pm
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] OS X installer
Can anyone on list co
Can anyone on list comment on maintenance of the OS X installer?
I've been meaning to point this out for a while - the supporting pkg
to modify permissions on /dev/bpf should rely on a launch daemon
instead of the current startup item.
I'm happy to submit whatever supporting scripts & installers
Hi Developers,
I want to get myself involved in the development of Wireshark. Can anybody
please let me know about the following:
1. Is there anywhere I need to get myself registered as a developer?
2. How are the tasks splitted across?
3. How is the synchronization among developers done
19 matches
Mail list logo
