Tyson Key writes:
OK, what about this:
for (rwe_pos = 0; rwe_pos < tvb_get_guint8(tvb, 12); rwe_pos++) {
proto_tree_add_item(felica_tree, hf_felica_block_nbr, tvb, 14 +
2*rwe_pos, 1, ENC_BIG_ENDIAN);
}
... or if you want the 0x80 bytes highlighted, try this:
for (rwe_pos =
Thanks Chris,
If I remember correctly, apart from an annoying, misleading "malformed
packet" error, I eventually managed to dump all of the block IDs (1-4)
using either :
/* Start counting from 13 */
for (rwe_pos = 13; rwe_pos < tvb_get_guint8(tvb, 13); rwe_pos+=2) {
p
Anders Broman skrev 2012-01-20 10:37:
-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Guy Harris
Sent: den 20 januari 2012 05:53
To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 4
Tyson Key writes:
> My (partially working) iteration code looks like:
>
>/* Start counting from 13 */
>for (rwe_pos = 13; rwe_pos < tvb_get_guint8(tvb, 13); rwe_pos++) {
> proto_tree_add_item(felica_tree, hf_felica_block_nbr, tvb,
> rwe_pos + 1, 1, ENC_BIG_EN
Hi,
I'm currently working on a dissector for Sony's FeliCa application
layer protocol; and things seem to be progressing nicely. However, I'm
facing some issues surrounding iterating through list data structures
in a non-standard manner.
The data structure in question is a list of memory block ID
ok, that worked for me (installing source twice). This is not a
demanding solution yet having a single folder would be more efficient.
Thx
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:46 PM, wrote:
>
>
> Yea, I've had to do a "distclean" when switching between the two "platforms"
> since they share common folders
Hi all,
I'm really sad I won't be able to participate with you of this meetup.
BUT since Belgium is THE best place on earth to drink some beers, what I
can do, is to share with you THE best place to drink them :
http://www.deliriumcafe.be/
There are more than 2000 beers there. Don't miss that
On 21 jan 2012, at 11:53, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> Hi Gerald,
>
> Thus wrote Gerald Combs (ger...@wireshark.org):
>
>> Can any developer who is attending FOSDEM *and* would like to meet at
>> the hotel on Friday the 3rd send me an email? I'm working on booking a
>> conference room for the day and