[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-7-x64

2010-05-19 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/333 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64 Build Reason: B

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RFE: Remove the old buildbot source tarballsfrom automated/src/

2010-05-19 Thread Jose Pedro Oliveira
Jaap, On 2010-05-19 21:58, Jaap Keuter wrote: > On 05/19/2010 10:46 PM, Jose Pedro Oliveira wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Would it be possible to have the pre-1.3.6 source tarballs >> removed from http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/src/ ? >> The directory listing is getting a bit too long. >> >> Th

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 1.4 & Cmake status - zlib

2010-05-19 Thread Jose Pedro Oliveira
Joerg, On 2010-05-19 14:06, Joerg Mayer wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 02:29:35PM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote: >> I'll take care of it. > > Committed revision 32899. Thanks for the update. Output from tshark (built from wireshark-1.3.6-SVN-32899.tar.bz2): -- $ ./tshark -v TShark 1.3.6-SV

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RFE: Remove the old buildbot source tarballs from automated/src/

2010-05-19 Thread Jaap Keuter
On 05/19/2010 10:46 PM, Jose Pedro Oliveira wrote: > Hi, > > Would it be possible to have the pre-1.3.6 source tarballs > removed from http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/src/ ? > The directory listing is getting a bit too long. > > Thanks in advance, > jpo Hi, Aren't you talking about re

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is it just me? (build error in packet-q708.c)

2010-05-19 Thread Guy Harris
On May 19, 2010, at 1:21 PM, Gerasimos Dimitriadis wrote: > I think that in this case there is no need for a conversion macro, since > we are not dealing with arrays but with pointers to value_string_ext. > By the way, are the VALS/TFS/RVALS casts necessary for certain > compilers? Because I t

[Wireshark-dev] RFE: Remove the old buildbot source tarballs from automated/src/

2010-05-19 Thread Jose Pedro Oliveira
Hi, Would it be possible to have the pre-1.3.6 source tarballs removed from http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/src/ ? The directory listing is getting a bit too long. Thanks in advance, jpo -- José Pedro Oliveira * mailto:j...@di.uminho.pt * _

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is it just me? (build error in packet-q708.c)

2010-05-19 Thread Gerasimos Dimitriadis
Hi, I think that in this case there is no need for a conversion macro, since we are not dealing with arrays but with pointers to value_string_ext. By the way, are the VALS/TFS/RVALS casts necessary for certain compilers? Because I thought that arrays automatically decay to pointers when needed

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is it just me? (build error in packet-q708.c)

2010-05-19 Thread Jaap Keuter
On 05/19/2010 04:07 PM, Jakub Zawadzki wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 02:56:52PM +0100, Martin Mathieson wrote: >> {&hf_q708_sanc, >> { "Signalling Area Network Code (SANC)","q708.sanc", >> - FT_UINT16, BASE_DEC | BASE_EXT_STRING, >> VALS(&q708_sanc_areas_e

Re: [Wireshark-dev] trunk-1.0 fails to compile on Windows with VS2008EE

2010-05-19 Thread Maynard, Chris
Ah yes, thanks Pascal. It's been a really long since I've worked with the 1.0 branch and forgot. If I comment out HHC_DIR in config.nmake, it compiles successfully with VS6.0; otherwise the following error occurs: Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 6.00.9782.0 Copyright (C) Mi

Re: [Wireshark-dev] "Extending Wireshark with Python" deprecated?

2010-05-19 Thread Scott
Ah. Thank you! On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote: > Scott wrote: > > This post is in reference to http://wiki.wireshark.org/Python. > > > > Using the 1.0.0 and 1.2.2 source I get the following warning: > > configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-python > > > > after ru

Re: [Wireshark-dev] "Extending Wireshark with Python" deprecated?

2010-05-19 Thread Jeff Morriss
Scott wrote: > This post is in reference to http://wiki.wireshark.org/Python. > > Using the 1.0.0 and 1.2.2 source I get the following warning: > configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-python > > after running these two commands in Ubuntu 9.10: > ./autogen.sh > ./configure --with-python

Re: [Wireshark-dev] trunk-1.0 fails to compile on Windows with VS2008EE

2010-05-19 Thread Pascal Quantin
Hi 2010/5/19 Maynard, Chris > As the subject line indicates, trunk-1.0 fails to compile on Windows with > VS2008EE. > > The error log is attached. > > VS2008EE compilation was added in wireshark 1.2. That's why. If really needed, you can try to backport the patchs attached (or check the comment

[Wireshark-dev] "Extending Wireshark with Python" deprecated?

2010-05-19 Thread Scott
This post is in reference to http://wiki.wireshark.org/Python. Using the 1.0.0 and 1.2.2 source I get the following warning: configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-python after running these two commands in Ubuntu 9.10: ./autogen.sh ./configure --with-python Is this not in the source a

[Wireshark-dev] trunk-1.0 fails to compile on Windows with VS2008EE

2010-05-19 Thread Maynard, Chris
As the subject line indicates, trunk-1.0 fails to compile on Windows with VS2008EE. The error log is attached. - Chris CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email are confidential and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this email in error, please delete it fro

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is it just me? (build error in packet-q708.c)

2010-05-19 Thread Jakub Zawadzki
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 02:56:52PM +0100, Martin Mathieson wrote: > { &hf_q708_sanc, > { "Signalling Area Network Code (SANC)","q708.sanc", > - FT_UINT16, BASE_DEC | BASE_EXT_STRING, > VALS(&q708_sanc_areas_ext), 0x0, > + FT_UINT16, BASE_DEC | BAS

[Wireshark-dev] Is it just me? (build error in packet-q708.c)

2010-05-19 Thread Martin Mathieson
I don't understand why I need to patch below to build this dissector, whereas the buildbots seem to be fine. Index: epan/dissectors/packet-q708.c === --- epan/dissectors/packet-q708.c (revision 32881) +++ epan/dissectors/packet-

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 1.4 & Cmake status - missing directory

2010-05-19 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 02:29:35PM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote: > I'll take care of it. Committed revision 32899. Ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microso

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 1.4 & Cmake status - missing directory

2010-05-19 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 02:21:56AM +0100, Jose Pedro Oliveira wrote: > But this is strange: "... without libz ... " as ENABLE_ZLIB was ON. Same here: Compiled (32-bit) with GLib 2.22.4, with libpcap (version unknown), without libz, with POSIX capabilities (Linux), with libpcre 7.9, with SMI 0.4.5

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 1.4 & Cmake status

2010-05-19 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 08:35:33PM +0200, Stig Bj?rlykke wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote: > > Maybe something went wrong with the current directory or the creation of > > AUTHORS-SHORT? > > Oh, it's because I have a generated AUTHORS-SHORT in the source directory. > Ma