yes i mean it is linked against ringbuffer.o
i am trying to use const gchar *ringbuf_current_filename(void);
which generates link problem undefined reference
> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:19:20 -0500
> From: jeff.morriss...@gmail.com
> To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev]
I think the problem is that the custom format function takes a guint32 as its
2nd argument and you need a guint64, so unless this is changed to a guint64,
you will have to modify your declaration to some other BASE_ supported by
FT_UINT64 and then use one of the other proto_tree_add_XYZ() routin
Eloy Paris wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On 03/11/2010 05:19 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> libwireshark is NOT thread safe. If you're using multiple threads,
>> you'd need one lock to prevent more than one thread from entering
>> libwireshark simultaneously.
>
> Indeed. I personally found tha
Hi Jeff,
On 03/11/2010 05:19 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
[...]
> libwireshark is NOT thread safe. If you're using multiple threads,
> you'd need one lock to prevent more than one thread from entering
> libwireshark simultaneously.
Indeed. I personally found that out while integrating libwireshark
On Mar 11, 2010, at 2:24 PM, David Arnold wrote:
> I'm writing a dissector for a protocol that uses a 64-bit time field
> which is not in the format required for FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME.
What do you mean by "the format required for FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME"? An
FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME field doesn't have to be in th
Hi!
I'm writing a dissector for a protocol that uses a 64-bit time field
which is not in the format required for FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME.
So, I declared the hfinfo like
{ &hf_prot_pkthdr_time,
{ "Transmit Time", "prot.time",
FT_UINT64, BASE_CUSTOM,
prot_fmt_tim
Kaul wrote:
> find_dissector("pkcs-1") doesn't seem to be the correct way to do it.
> How do I do it?
> There's a PKCS1 blob I want the PKCS#1 dissector to dissect. How do I
> call it? I can create a TVB for it, of course.
You'd need that dissector to be registered by name (by calling
register_
yassine antir wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i am working in one application where am using tshark. i have two issues
> to fix:
>
> 1) i am using the tshark code on my application so we can say in other
> words thark is the listening part of the application
> the application is multithreading one where multi
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Ubuntu-9.10-x64 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Ubuntu-9.10-x64/builds/283
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: ubuntu-9.10-x64
Build Reas
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-PowerPC on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-PowerPC/builds/1292
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc
Build Reas
Hello,
I added a tap interface and statistics for my protocol, I see that the
main packet count is working fine
but when I try to fetch the sub-type statistics, somewhere the Total
is wrong, i.e, my output shows:
Total Packets 36
Foo Packet Types36
Message Type-1 26
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/1623
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86
Build Reason:
Bui
Hi,
i am working in one application where am using tshark. i have two issues to fix:
1) i am using the tshark code on my application so we can say in other words
thark is the listening part of the application
the application is multithreading one where multiple threads share the
libwireshark l
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-7-x64 on Wireshark
(development).
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-7-x64/builds/483
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
Buildslave for this Build: windows-7-x64
Build Reason:
B
14 matches
Mail list logo
