yes i mean it is linked against ringbuffer.o
i am trying to use const gchar *ringbuf_current_filename(void);

which generates link problem undefined reference

> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:19:20 -0500
> From: jeff.morriss...@gmail.com
> To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] use tshark as part of one application
> 
> yassine antir wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > i am working in one application where am using tshark. i have two issues 
> > to fix:
> > 
> > 1) i am using the tshark code on my application so we can say in other 
> > words thark is the listening part of the application
> > the application is multithreading one where multiple threads share the 
> > libwireshark librairies and use the same tshark functions
> > the problem is that an assertion acquired (my case in ftypes file (don*t 
> > re-register) and probably there is more assertions afterwards) in case i 
> > am trying to create multiple threads
> 
> libwireshark is NOT thread safe.  If you're using multiple threads, 
> you'd need one lock to prevent more than one thread from entering 
> libwireshark simultaneously.
> 
> > 2) the second issue is that i need to use functions of ringbuffer.h but 
> > i got undefined reference of it when linking although ringbuffer.c is 
> > part of the application
> > i tried to define function as extern in the header but doesnt resolve 
> > problem
> 
> You mean that the application is linked against ringbuffer.o?  What 
> symbols give the problem?
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail : un service de messagerie gratuit, fiable et complet
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to