Re: [Wireshark-dev] pidl license question

2007-08-12 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 11:05:44AM +0200, Luis EG Ontanon wrote: > YAPP's Driver is either GPL or Artistic . > > http://search.cpan.org/~fdesar/Parse-Yapp-1.05/lib/Parse/Yapp.pm#COPYRIGHT Sure, but GPLv2 only if I see this correctly? ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer

Re: [Wireshark-dev] p2p_dir

2007-08-12 Thread Guy Harris
Richard van der Hoff wrote: > Guy Harris wrote: >> That would make sense, especially given that, for WTAP_ENCAP_ISDN, >> dissect_frame() sets pinfo0>p2p_dir based on the setting of >> pinfo->pseudo_header.isdn.uton.> >> > Well, it does now I've made it do so... ;) As far as I can tell, it's done

Re: [Wireshark-dev] p2p_dir

2007-08-12 Thread Richard van der Hoff
Richard van der Hoff wrote: > Guy Harris wrote: > >>Richard van der Hoff wrote: >> >> >>>It seems better to use pinfo->p2p_dir for this. >> >>That would make sense, especially given that, for WTAP_ENCAP_ISDN, >>dissect_frame() sets pinfo0>p2p_dir based on the setting of >>pinfo->pseudo_header.is

Re: [Wireshark-dev] p2p_dir

2007-08-12 Thread Richard van der Hoff
Guy Harris wrote: > Richard van der Hoff wrote: > >>It seems better to use pinfo->p2p_dir for this. > > That would make sense, especially given that, for WTAP_ENCAP_ISDN, > dissect_frame() sets pinfo0>p2p_dir based on the setting of > pinfo->pseudo_header.isdn.uton.> > Well, it does now I've m

Re: [Wireshark-dev] p2p_dir

2007-08-12 Thread Guy Harris
Richard van der Hoff wrote: > It seems better to use pinfo->p2p_dir for this. That would make sense, especially given that, for WTAP_ENCAP_ISDN, dissect_frame() sets pinfo0>p2p_dir based on the setting of pinfo->pseudo_header.isdn.uton.> I just wanted to check > that this was the intended us

Re: [Wireshark-dev] added IANA port-numbers file as "services"

2007-08-12 Thread Ulf Lamping
Stig Bjørlykke schrieb: > Den 12. aug. 2007 kl. 22.56 skrev Ulf Lamping: > > >> UNIX packages will still miss this (optional) file I guess. Anyone >> with >> more insight in the UNIX packaging process might want to add it. >> >> Or is it enough simply to add it to Makefile.am, just as I did

Re: [Wireshark-dev] added IANA port-numbers file as "services"

2007-08-12 Thread Stig Bjørlykke
Den 12. aug. 2007 kl. 22.56 skrev Ulf Lamping: > UNIX packages will still miss this (optional) file I guess. Anyone > with > more insight in the UNIX packaging process might want to add it. > > Or is it enough simply to add it to Makefile.am, just as I did > already? Also adding "services" to

[Wireshark-dev] added IANA port-numbers file as "services"

2007-08-12 Thread Ulf Lamping
Hi List! After getting permission from IANA to use their port-numbers file (see http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200708/msg00160.html), I've: - added the IANA port-numbers file as a file named "services", with some minor explanations from me at the top of that file - add it to the d

Re: [Wireshark-dev] libsmi license

2007-08-12 Thread Andrew Hood
Luis EG Ontanon wrote: > there's a win/ directory in the distribution and it looks that it's > been compiled already. I'll look for a binary or we might be able to > buid one ourselves, I have no windows box on weekends (infact they are > supposed to be for relax :-) so I'll try to compile it on mo

Re: [Wireshark-dev] pidl license question

2007-08-12 Thread Luis EG Ontanon
On 8/12/07, Ulf Lamping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joerg Mayer schrieb: > Another thing would be to use code/data from GPLv3 samba, which is a > problem as GPLv2 and v3 is *not* compatible. In addition: If the samba > tools would start to include GPLv3 headers into the generated files, we > must

Re: [Wireshark-dev] libsmi license

2007-08-12 Thread Luis EG Ontanon
there's a win/ directory in the distribution and it looks that it's been compiled already. I'll look for a binary or we might be able to buid one ourselves, I have no windows box on weekends (infact they are supposed to be for relax :-) so I'll try to compile it on monday if I have the time. On th

Re: [Wireshark-dev] pidl license question

2007-08-12 Thread Ulf Lamping
Joerg Mayer schrieb: > Samba's svn has made the switch from GPLv2 to GPLv3. While I don't see > any problem in including a GPLv3 tool (pidl) into the Wireshark repository > I have a question regarding the license of the generated dissectors. So > far the generated dissectors don't contain a license

Re: [Wireshark-dev] libsmi license

2007-08-12 Thread Ulf Lamping
Luis EG Ontanon schrieb: > is this license GPL compatible? > > http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/projects/libsmi/COPYING.html?lang=de > > I'd like to allow filtering of snmp Values by name, but AFAIK net-snmp > does not allow me to traverse the MIBs, other than that this lib has > no dependencies so it mi

Re: [Wireshark-dev] libsmi license

2007-08-12 Thread Luis EG Ontanon
It does what I need. I still have to figure out the license. I found about-it looking independently. But, later I found out that it was mentioned in this list more than once. I like it because it is quite simple... and BTW I'm almost done coding... The problems I referred to where related to "li

Re: [Wireshark-dev] pidl license question

2007-08-12 Thread Luis EG Ontanon
YAPP's Driver is either GPL or Artistic . http://search.cpan.org/~fdesar/Parse-Yapp-1.05/lib/Parse/Yapp.pm#COPYRIGHT On 8/12/07, Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 10:30:51AM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote: > > Samba's svn has made the switch from GPLv2 to GPLv3. While I

Re: [Wireshark-dev] pidl license question

2007-08-12 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 10:30:51AM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote: > Samba's svn has made the switch from GPLv2 to GPLv3. While I don't see > any problem in including a GPLv3 tool (pidl) into the Wireshark repository > I have a question regarding the license of the generated dissectors. So > far the gene

[Wireshark-dev] pidl license question

2007-08-12 Thread Joerg Mayer
Samba's svn has made the switch from GPLv2 to GPLv3. While I don't see any problem in including a GPLv3 tool (pidl) into the Wireshark repository I have a question regarding the license of the generated dissectors. So far the generated dissectors don't contain a license statement (nor a copyright s

Re: [Wireshark-dev] libsmi license

2007-08-12 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 04:55:09AM +0200, Luis EG Ontanon wrote: > is this license GPL compatible? > > http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/projects/libsmi/COPYING.html?lang=de > > I'd like to allow filtering of snmp Values by name, but AFAIK net-snmp > does not allow me to traverse the MIBs, other than th