Richard van der Hoff wrote: > It seems better to use pinfo->p2p_dir for this.
That would make sense, especially given that, for WTAP_ENCAP_ISDN, dissect_frame() sets pinfo0>p2p_dir based on the setting of pinfo->pseudo_header.isdn.uton.> I just wanted to check > that this was the intended use of this field before modifying the isdn > dissector. (It's also not entirely obvious how the user/network > semantics of isdn should map onto the sent/received semantics of > p2p_dir; however, I don't think that actually matters a great deal). I don't think it does, either. (If you think of the capture as being done on the "user" side of the user-to-network interface, "sending" means a user-to-network packet and "receiving" means a network-to-user packet. That's how dissect_frame() sets it.) _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
