Jaap Keuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has asked for review_for_checkin:
Bug 1730: Patches to PANA Protocol Dissector (packet-pana.c)
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1730
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.w
Sorry to be a pedant, but I think you will find that lack of copyright
notice does not imply lack of copyright. (The US used to have this but
adopted the provisions of the Berne Convention in 1989 joining more
enlightened countries). See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright#Copyright_notices for
I've been trying to build Wireshark (latest SVN as well as 0.99.5) and
I've been having some issues. I've seen this issue under both VS2003
and VS2005. I'm running XP SP2, and using the latest cygwin install.
When I run the build command for the first time, using the
instructions from here:
http
Hi List!
Anyone interested in a meeting at the CCC this year?
Regards, ULFL
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
Sake Blok wrote:
> However, it seems like patches are now not picked up at all anymore. I
> did not count, but I think I have not seen (m)any commits based on the
> patches filed through bugzilla. I guess this is due to the fact that
> old habits of the "committers" take some time to be changed in
This is an automated answer:
re-post in bugzilla.
;-)
On 8/7/07, Victor Fajardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jaap,
> > 1. We've recently changed the patch submission policy to go through
> > bugzilla. This in order to have patches like this not overlooked.
> >
>
> Ok. I'll go through that proce
Hi Jaap,
> 1. We've recently changed the patch submission policy to go through
> bugzilla. This in order to have patches like this not overlooked.
>
Ok. I'll go through that process in the next rev.
> 2. I can't comment on the merits of the patch in relation to the draft
> referenced, but I'
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 03:34:43PM -0700, Gerald Combs wrote:
> We've had a problem with patches sent to wireshark-dev being missed and
> ignored for a while now. In order to try to keep this from happening, we
> now have new patch submission guidelines: instead of sending them to the
> list, they
Hi,
Two things.
1. We've recently changed the patch submission policy to go through
bugzilla. This in order to have patches like this not overlooked.
2. I can't comment on the merits of the patch in relation to the draft
referenced, but I've spotted this code error:
/* Reserved field
To wireshark-maintainers,
Attached is a patch file for the PANA protocol dissector. The changes
updates the packet-pana.c dissector to support draft-ietf-pana-pana-18.txt.
regards,
victor
Index: packet-pana.c
===
--- packet-pana.c
Luis EG Ontanon schrieb:
> Wow!
> Even /etc/services from Mac OS/X (in turn taken from FreeBSD) has many
> more entries.
>
> [id-est:ws/trunk/wiretap] lego% sed 's/#.*//; s/[ \t]+//;'
> /etc/services | grep -v -c '^$'
> 8059
> [id-est:ws/trunk/wiretap] lego% sed 's/#.*//; s/[ \t]+//;'
> ../../../nm
Fabrizio Bertocci wrote:
> Jeff Morriss wrote:
>> For the releases we (try to) turn off warnings as errors because, well,
>> we can't clean up all the warnings on all the platform+Glib/GTK+compiler
>> combinations--especially with compiler bugs.
>>
>> For 0.99.6 warnings-as-errors was turned off in
Jeff Morriss wrote:
>
> For the releases we (try to) turn off warnings as errors because, well,
> we can't clean up all the warnings on all the platform+Glib/GTK+compiler
> combinations--especially with compiler bugs.
>
> For 0.99.6 warnings-as-errors was turned off in the top level configure
> but
Wow!
Even /etc/services from Mac OS/X (in turn taken from FreeBSD) has many
more entries.
[id-est:ws/trunk/wiretap] lego% sed 's/#.*//; s/[ \t]+//;'
/etc/services | grep -v -c '^$'
8059
[id-est:ws/trunk/wiretap] lego% sed 's/#.*//; s/[ \t]+//;'
../../../nmap-4.20/nmap-services | grep -v -c '^$'
22
Seehofer, Markus schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> enclosed you find a new version of the IEEE1588/PTP
> dissector. This dissector now includes the coming
> version 2 of the standard. It supports both IP/UDP
> and pure ethernet frames.
>
> I've sent this mail already at end of june but got no
> response. If so
Fabrizio Bertocci wrote:
> Guy Harris wrote:
>>
>> That's not a bug, that's a feature; in 0.99.6, the default is to enable
>> warnings as errors, and you have to...
>>
>>
>>> If I run 'configure' with '--disable-warnings-as-errors' I don't get
>>> that compilation error, so it must be something
Guy Harris wrote:
That's not a bug, that's a feature; in 0.99.6, the default is to enable
warnings as errors, and you have to...
If I run 'configure' with '--disable-warnings-as-errors' I don't get
that compilation error, so it must be something in the configure script
that doesn't work qui
Luis EG Ontanon schrieb:
> nmap-services is much richer I guess...
>
No, it's not ;-)
After I've stripped both files from header and footer comments:
nmap-services has 2286 lines (all of them entries)
port-numbers has 14992 lines (about half of them comments)
So the official IANA port-numb
18 matches
Mail list logo
