Hi Jaap,
> 1. We've recently changed the patch submission policy to go through 
> bugzilla. This in order to have patches like this not overlooked.
>   

Ok. I'll go through that process in the next rev.

> 2. I can't comment on the merits of the patch in relation to the draft 
> referenced, but I've spotted this code error:
>          /* Reserved field */
>          proto_tree_add_item(pana_tree, hf_pana_reserved_type, tvb, 
> offset, 1, FALSE);
> -       offset += 1;
> +       offset += 2;
>
> This should be:
>          /* Reserved field */
> -       proto_tree_add_item(pana_tree, hf_pana_reserved_type, tvb, 
> offset, 1, FALSE);
> -       offset += 1;
> +       proto_tree_add_item(pana_tree, hf_pana_reserved_type, tvb, 
> offset, 2, FALSE);
> +       offset += 2;
>   

Thanks for catching this. Your suggestion is appropriate. Do you want me 
to re-post this corrected patch in bugzilla or will you be commiting the 
patch for now ?

regards,
victor

> Thanx,
> Jaap
>
>
> Victor Fajardo wrote:
>   
>> To wireshark-maintainers,
>>
>> Attached is a patch file for the PANA protocol dissector. The changes 
>> updates the packet-pana.c dissector to support draft-ietf-pana-pana-18.txt.
>>
>> regards,
>> victor
>>
>>
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
>
>
>   

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to