lable and has a much
bigger range? a+g hybrids are preferred, but i would settle for a g-only
product that has good signal strength.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
BAWUG's general wireless chat mailing list
[unsubscribe] http://lis
e's a dual-homed Linux box acting as a traffic
controller (provides authentication and whatnot).
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
BAWUG's general wireless chat mailing list
[unsubscribe] http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
orizon most likely. Try tilting your antenna down toward where you
> need more signal.
>
> Cheers,
> Cliff
>
> On Jun 22, 2004, at 6:05 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 16:54, Jason Chang wrote:
> >
> >> I think it is better to wor
th antenna ports?
Would that work with any access point?
I'm particularly interested in:
- Linksys WAP54G
- Cisco Aironet 1300 (the version with external antennas)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
BAWUG's general wireless ch
points?
Do they use "special" solutions such as BelAir 200? (which is supposed
to eliminate the need for wires)
Just curious. It's a very interesting problem from a technical
perspective.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___