On 12 September 2011 15:44, Adrian Borucki wrote:
>
> On 12 September 2011 02:17, SII wrote:
>
>> I thought D-Bus was only good for outright notification and limited
>> control?
>
>
> D-Bus is good not only for control and notification but also transmitting
> data. Its key advantages are good en
On 12 September 2011 02:17, SII wrote:
> I thought D-Bus was only good for outright notification and limited
> control?
D-Bus is good not only for control and notification but also transmitting
data. Its key advantages are good encapsulation and speed (it uses binary
protocol).
> If everythin
I thought D-Bus was only good for outright notification and limited control?
If everything works as planned, significant modification will have to be
done...not only making controls of the application usable to Wintermute, but
also removing the little things that don't really work very well within
Sweet, Phill. Having an introspection is always good. We would be trying to
have a plugin that communicated to Wintermute and Chrome by means of D-Bus.
D-bus is Wintermutes needle into the veins of the system...
On Friday, September 9, 2011, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> ** CORRECTION** for UBUNTU, no
We'd still have to do some major mods to get Winty to fit it into it's own
DE. (yes, working on the design, give me a couple more days)
-Dante
On 6 September 2011 20:18, Jacky Alcine wrote:
> Wouldn't have to totally modify Chromium, we'd have to take advantage of
> NPAPI (ie: search up Chromif
Wouldn't have to totally modify Chromium, we'd have to take advantage of
NPAPI (ie: search up Chromify-OSD in the Chrome Store). We could bind it to
interpret whatever it can from Flash objects (some objects could be linked
to RDF data, but I haven't seen it done).
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:34 AM,
6 matches
Mail list logo
