Thanks for the update, Joscelyn.
Andreas
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:52 PM, wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestions and views about whether/what sort of submission
> WMUK should make to the consultation on the CDB.
>
> There isn't a 'response' to comment on at the moment as we agreed as a
> Board
> o
I see that the EGM call has been closed as unsuccessful. Do calls like that
have a legal expiry date based on their opening, or was it just considered
stale?
WH.
On 2 August 2012 01:26, WilliamH wrote:
> Very well, in that case I withdraw my request and look at the possible
> options.
>
> WH.
>
On 6 August 2012 01:11, WilliamH wrote:
>
> I see that the EGM call has been closed as unsuccessful. Do calls like that
> have a legal expiry date based on their opening, or was it just considered
> stale?
Calls like that don't have any legal meaning - the law only talks
about the actual reques
Got it.
I find it odd that Ashley grasped the incompatibility of his position
before the rest of the board did, and more to the point, that they only did
grasp it *after* he stepped down. Of those who signed the EGM, what are
your views on that?
WH.
On 6 August 2012 01:19, Thomas Dalton wrote
On 5 Aug 2012, at 18:34, WilliamH wrote:
> I find it odd that Ashley grasped the incompatibility of his position before
> the rest of the board did, and more to the point, that they only did grasp it
> after he stepped down.
{{citation needed}}. I'm curious to know why you think this?
Thanks,
