Re: [weewx-user] Update from 5.0 to 5.1 not showing up on the log?

2024-08-08 Thread weerman
Good morning, Just an update: I was able to fix my problem. I had mistakenly installed venv in a folder that was not a weewx folder. So I installed the venv folder inside the weewx folder and activated venv and then upgraded to 5.0 and then version 5.1. Now the upgrade worked . BR Georg Tom Ke

Re: [weewx-user] Re: Belchertown and MQTT configuration error

2024-08-08 Thread vince
try "sudo ss -tupl" which should show which process is using port 1883 On Wednesday, August 7, 2024 at 7:49:16 PM UTC-7 M&M wrote: > Thanks for looking into this for me. I feel like I've read a bunch of > pages and that I'm really close to this. I've attached my weewx.conf, > mosquitto.co

[weewx-user] Forecast data to InfluxDB?

2024-08-08 Thread Zach Elliott
I have weewx-influx (https://github.com/matthewwall/weewx-influx/tree/master) installed as well as weewx-forecast (https://github.com/chaunceygardiner/weewx-forecast) installed configured to use NWS. Both are working well, however i'm not sure how to get the forecast data flowing into Influx fo

Re: [weewx-user] Re: Belchertown and MQTT configuration error

2024-08-08 Thread
Looks like I have two mosquittos running on 1883 but they have the same PID. pi@raspberrypi:/etc/weewx/skins/Belchertown $ sudo ss -tupl NetidState Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:PortProcess udp UNCONN

Re: [weewx-user] Re: Belchertown and MQTT configuration error

2024-08-08 Thread vince
(apologies for the long post below) No - you have one process listening on two ports, which is correct. I just did a full install to a clean pi4 it works for me. Here are the config file snippets and some diagnostic information Note - if you set log_success true in the MQTT section you can

Re: [weewx-user] Re: Belchertown and MQTT configuration error

2024-08-08 Thread
Interesting. I changed log_success to true however my /var/log/weewx.log file is empty. On Thursday, August 8, 2024 at 11:12:37 PM UTC-4 vince wrote: > (apologies for the long post below) > > No - you have one process listening on two ports, which is correct. > > I just did a full install to a