on incorporating the WOCommunity Association
May be this is a two step process.
Operationally, Pascal needs a non-profit right now for WOWODC 2012, etc. and
having a non-profit without a bigger licensing issues to deal with would be
good.
Once the organization is up, then it can work to move
Le 2011-09-20 à 10:16, Paul Yu a écrit :
> May be this is a two step process.
>
> Operationally, Pascal needs a non-profit right now for WOWODC 2012, etc. and
> having a non-profit without a bigger licensing issues to deal with would be
> good.
If we really want to move Wonder to Apache (and
May be this is a two step process.
Operationally, Pascal needs a non-profit right now for WOWODC 2012, etc. and
having a non-profit without a bigger licensing issues to deal with would be
good.
Once the organization is up, then it can work to move the code to apache...
Paul
On Sep 20, 2011, a
+1 for Apache.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> I was trying to find a statement on the association objectives.
>
> Here is a crazy idea - maybe instead of starting a new non-profit, the
> community should consider taking the open source parts of the WO code and
> join th
That's the best suggestion bar-none... makes much more sense than to me than
starting up some obscure non-profit in Canada :)
It also provides longevity to the project(s), should various current
contributors retire at some point.
cheers
Lachlan Deck
lachlan.d...@gmail.com
On 19/09/2011, at 11:
+1
And, it would certainly give devs more cred when we have to stand before
someone about our technology choices.
Tim Worman
UCLA GSE&IS
On Sep 19, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sep 19, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
>> That is an interesting idea. I can see th
+1
On Sep 19, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> That is an interesting idea. I can see that it would make Wonder/WO seem much
> more credible.
>
>
> On 2011-09-19, at 6:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> I was trying to find a statement on the association objectives.
>>
>> Here is a cra
That is an interesting idea. I can see that it would make Wonder/WO seem much
more credible.
On 2011-09-19, at 6:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> I was trying to find a statement on the association objectives.
>
> Here is a crazy idea - maybe instead of starting a new non-profit, the
> commun
Project Wonder is BSD-licensed, WOLips was Apache licensed the last time I
checked... Both licenses are ASF-friendly (obviously) and that by itself gets
us pretty far.
The practical requirement to start releasing all this code as "Apache
WOSomething" is to track down all contributors and ask t
Once the organization is formed, then we can have someone else do the
accounting.
Paul
On Sep 19, 2011, at 9:46 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
> Le 2011-09-19 à 09:31, George Domurot a écrit :
>
>> You can still set your FY as 1/1 to 12/31.
>
> But this is also my own fiscal year, so I have to f
This is a great idea. But before, I think we need to figure out who "owns"
Wonder and WOLips...
> I was trying to find a statement on the association objectives.
>
> Here is a crazy idea - maybe instead of starting a new non-profit, the
> community should consider taking the open source parts
Gotcha. Totally makes sense.
-G
On Sep 19, 2011, at 6:46 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
> Le 2011-09-19 à 09:31, George Domurot a écrit :
>
>> You can still set your FY as 1/1 to 12/31.
>
> But this is also my own fiscal year, so I have to finish accounting for both
> myself and the communit
Le 2011-09-19 à 09:31, George Domurot a écrit :
> You can still set your FY as 1/1 to 12/31.
But this is also my own fiscal year, so I have to finish accounting for both
myself and the community at the same time. Already, just accounting for the
community is taking me 2 days of work per year,
You can still set your FY as 1/1 to 12/31.
-G
On Sep 19, 2011, at 6:14 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
> Le 2011-09-19 à 09:12, David LeBer a écrit :
>
>> On 2011-09-19, at 9:04 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
>>
>>> Strange: "The fiscal year of the board shall be November 1 to October 31."
>>> Is that
I was trying to find a statement on the association objectives.
Here is a crazy idea - maybe instead of starting a new non-profit, the
community should consider taking the open source parts of the WO code and join
the Apache Software Foundation. The benefits are the following:
* WOCommunity wi
Le 2011-09-19 à 09:12, David LeBer a écrit :
> On 2011-09-19, at 9:04 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
>
>> Strange: "The fiscal year of the board shall be November 1 to October 31."
>> Is that the Canadian fiscal year?
>
> The start of the fiscal year of a Canadian corporation is not locked to the
> s
On 2011-09-19, at 9:04 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
> Strange: "The fiscal year of the board shall be November 1 to October 31."
> Is that the Canadian fiscal year?
The start of the fiscal year of a Canadian corporation is not locked to the
start of the calendar year. I'm assuming that Pascal hopes t
Strange: "The fiscal year of the board shall be November 1 to October 31."
Is that the Canadian fiscal year?
On 19/09/2011, at 10:49 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
> Good morning everyone,
>
> As you may know, we want to register the association as a non-profit
> organization in Canada. Since this is
Good morning everyone,
As you may know, we want to register the association as a non-profit
organization in Canada. Since this is the first time I'm doing this, I would
like input from you for the by-laws. You can find a draft in the wiki:
http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WOCOM
19 matches
Mail list logo
