I am running web2py (1.86.2) on Debian Lenny with Nginx and uwsgi.
This is a local test server that I have physical access to.
I can access the welcome and admin pages from the server (localhost),
so it appears the admin interface is working.
And I can access the welcome app from other computers
raise HTTP(200, T('Admin is disabled because insecure channel'))
>
> is uwsgi not setting wsgi_url_scheme?
>
> On Oct 22, 10:33 pm, Triquetra
> wrote:
>
> > I am running web2py (1.86.2) on Debian Lenny with Nginx and uwsgi.
> > This is a local test server
Thank you, that worked.
I also had to create a symbolic link (parameters_443.py) pointing to
the password file (parameters_8000.py) in order to get rid of the
"unable to access password file" error.
On Oct 23, 12:44 pm, "Roberto De Ioris" wrote:
> > Thank you for the quick reply.
>
> > I'm not s
I read the example with great interest, but I don't understand why "3
Web2Py instances, one XML configuration" is better than multiple
configuration files. I'm not saying it's not better, I just really
don't understand it.
It would seem that either way, one still has 3 uwsgi instances and 3
web2p
See http://web2pyramid.pylonsproject.org/
There is very little information about this on the net. The link on
the site just points to the pylons project on github.
Is this legitimate? or is this just an attempt to divert web2py
traffic to pylons/pyramid?
I think a standalone workflow system is too high level.
Workflow type systems (among other things) can be more than adequately
developed with robust access control mechanisms. I'd like to see
web2py's access control beefed up (thus permitting easy development of
workflows, among other things). S
ated by the content of a field).
> On Friday, October 21, 2011 3:54:26 PM UTC-4, Triquetra wrote:
>
> > I'd like to see
> > web2py's access control beefed up (thus permitting easy development of
> > workflows, among other things). Specifically, the current web2py
ething...
>
> It would be great if it is possible...
>
> Richard
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Richard Vézina
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > And why the object could not be a query that can return a list of records
> > having the state you ar
I'm sure assistance with documentation would be appreciated by all!
On Oct 26, 10:16 am, Hong-Khoan Quach
wrote:
> I want to thank you all for your suggestions so far and please
> post further suggestions :).
>
> Massimo, Anthony or other contributors/committers, do you
> have anything on your TO
I'm having this same issue using cas_auth. I'm running my own CAS
appliance.
My applications successfully redirects to CAS on login, but not on
registration. When I try to login, I get an "invalid login" error, I
presume because the registration was never entered into CAS, but only in the
lo
10 matches
Mail list logo
