there a way to tell when a define_table has to actually create
the table, so I can stuff in an initial record? I suppose I could do
a query after the definition, but then it will get done for every
request.
Thanks in advance,
Scott Hunter
P.S. I'm currently using v1.65.10; if a newer versio
field unique,
> after there is data in it, web2py has no way of knowing if the data
> already in was unique or not and there is no easy way of checking.
>
> On Oct 5, 4:13 pm, Scott Hunter wrote:
>
>
>
> > 1) I want to let migration add a UNIQUE=true field to a table, whi
revent the update from accidentally happening twice?
>
> Massimo
>
> On Oct 5, 6:26 pm, Scott Hunter wrote:
>
>
>
> > Thanks for the quick reply!
>
> > The situation I'm interested in is where the field doesn't exist and
> > I'm adding it
_need_to_do()
>
> On Oct 6, 8:48 am, Scott Hunter wrote:
>
>
>
> > My scenario is that I have version X of an appliance which is missing
> > the field in question, and I add it to the model for version X+1.
> > Currently, web2py will handle adding that field to the approp
I've just downloaded the MacOSX v 1.63.3, and its exhibiting this same
problem. I had gotten an earlier copy through launchpad, and the
problem was indeed fixed. Is it possible the pre-compiled version
isn't up to date? I noticed that the web2py executable (in the MacOS
directory) is dated 1/8/
ed, and is
building the login page; why should it matter HOW it was requested?)
Thanks for any help,
Scott
On Jun 3, 5:21 pm, Scott Hunter wrote:
> I've just downloaded the MacOSX v 1.63.3, and its exhibiting this same
> problem. I had gotten an earlier copy through launchpad, and the
In the source & Mac-standalone versions of web2py, one can (and I
did :)) change/replace the file web2py.py in order to modify the
server application. (In my case, I'm adding a list of server IPs to
choose from and spawning an extra process; the latter could presumably
be done elsewhere, but it i
A colleague has lodged the following complaints about web2py, and I'd
like to run my responses by this group in order to correct/strengthen
those responses.
Complaint #1: No real-time debugging (i.e. proper step-debugging in a
real IDE)
Response #1: web2py, being a framework, does not include a f
Could someone point me to good (however you define "good") example of
test code for a web2py appliance? It looks like the "test" links in
admin only refer to doctests, but I can't find examples of what these
might look like for a web2py appliance. There is an entry in AlterEgo
(#213) which sets
I've added the following field to the table worksheet:
SQLField('mysortkey', length = 40, default = 'something' )
I get a ticket reporting:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/scott/web2py_1_68_2/gluon/restricted.py", line 184, in
restricted
exec ccode in environment
File "/h
Just downloaded v 1.61.4 (Mac), and I'm having a problem w/ widgets.
For example:
def ta_widget(field,value,nr):
"Widget to allow size of textarea to be specified""
return TEXTAREA("xyz", _type="text", _class="text", _rows=nr,
_cols=40,
_nam
ssage).
Thanks again,
Scott
On May 8, 10:46 am, mdipierro wrote:
> I cannot reproduce the problem but there is a typo in your code
>
> "Widget to allow size of textarea to be specified""
>
> should be
>
> "Widget to allow size of textarea to
t actually it is a bigger
> > problem that it seems. With fix is that if the widget is too complex
> > it may not display the error (because it is not obvious where the
> > error should be displayed).
> > I will keep working on this but let me know if this is fine for y
I'm trying out the Auth tool (very sweet!), and wondering if it can
handle the following:
I've decorated a controller/function to require a login, and auth
dutifully redirects me to a login page, and properly processes the
login. But when I've logged in, I'd like it to go to the page I
originall
, mdipierro wrote:
> What you want is the default behavior of the web2py in trunk.
> Are you using 1.61.4?
>
> Massimo
>
> On May 13, 11:17 am, Scott Hunter wrote:
>
>
>
> > I'm trying out the Auth tool (very sweet!), and wondering if it can
> > hand
I hit this one a while back; its a limitation of SQLite.
* You could create a new process to access the DB, but that's probably
not very safe (they really mean the Lite part of the name!)
* You could switch to a DB, like MySQL, which does support concurrent
access
* You could have your thread a
Is it possible to supply command line options to the windows
executable version (web2py.exe) of web2py, either explicitly or via a
config file, and if so, how? (I see that I can specify a config file
w/ a command line option - "that's some catch, that catch-22" :)
Thanks in advance,
Scott
--~--
Using the shell command-line option of web2py, one can create a daemon
with full access to the DB that the webserver has. Is it possible to
do something similar w/ a thread created within web2py? When I tried,
I got complaints that my db variable wasn't defined; then I tried to
include my model
ey take long.
> I principle a model, view controller can start its own thread but you
> should pass a SQLDB object to it. It needs to instantiate its own
> connection to the database and commit or rollback explicitly.
>
> Massimo
>
> On Oct 8, 4:42 pm, Scott Hunter <[EMAIL PR
When trying to run web2py off of Python 2.6, we got the following
error from code that works fine under Python 2.5.x (note that the
error trace never ventures out of the web2py code). Our immediate
solution is to use the older Python, but thought I'd point it out
(this is run on a Windows 2000 SP
The subject pretty much says it: will web2py run on an iPhone, and if
not, what are (or might be) the obstacles that prevent it?
- sbh
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py Web Framework" group.
To
To elaborate on title: I have a simple web2py app, from which I can insert
records into a particular table (using a smart grid, or from within a
controller), but trying to do so with the app posted to GAE, it fails (for
either method). Operations using other tables work fine. I believe it has
As requested, here is the traceback:
In FILE:
/base/data/home/apps/s~sbhweb2py/1.364873083036857122/applications/ppt_demo/controllers/default.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/base/data/home/apps/s~sbhweb2py/1.364873083036857122/gluon/restricted.py",
line 212, in restricted
ex
I entered 15.0 in the form, which sure looks like a float to me. If I had
entered a non-float, automatic validation should have caught it before the
appengine sdk was called to do a set. And when I used an insert statement
myself using the DAL, I tried hard-coding a 10.0 for that field -- same
OK, it seems that GAE isn't fond of floats, but is quite happy with doubles
-- its now happy with inserting both from a smartgrid-created form and from
DAL calls.
(I couldn't define any fields directly b/c the table/entity no longer
appeared.)
Thanks.
On Monday, January 28, 2013 7:37:52 PM UT
Sorry - yes, I changed the model, replacing the floats with doubles.
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 4:33:12 AM UTC-5, Alan Etkin wrote:
>
> > OK, it seems that GAE isn't fond of floats, but is quite happy with
> doubles
>
> Good to know, but, how did you fix GAE?. Have you changed your model? This
As I understand it, the GAE datastore will automatically create an index
for every field of every table (to facilitate queries using single fields);
those requiring multiple fields also get generated, but will get added to
index.yaml by the SDK when tested locally. Since these are created outsi
can check if the DAL has a secret way to handle it, and/or create a
> patch to allow it.
>
> may i ask what advantage you are hoping to achieve by skipping those
> indexes? i've left them on for fear of making a bad choice that i can't
> revert.
>
> christian
&g
hours per
> day on my largest paid application. :)
>
> cfh
>
> On Thursday, February 21, 2013 5:59:06 PM UTC-8, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>
>> According to
>> https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/indexes#Unindexed_Properties,
>>
>>
rride those
> default properties with what you want (there are a few techniques for not
> explicitly listing fields, depending on which technique you are using the
> answer here is different.
>
> this patch against HG trunk this AM might work (i say might cause i have
> not te
Scott
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 1:04:12 AM UTC-5, howesc wrote:
>
> it looks like you have a typo "custom_qualifer" vs "custom_qualifier"
>
> On Monday, February 25, 2013 6:44:14 PM UTC-8, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>
>> I applied the patch, and added
he indexes DOES make a difference; with the changes
above, instead of using up over 30% of my quota, I'm "only" using 23%. If
I can get the strings unindexed, and take out the web2py-supplied fields
(created_by & _on, modified_by & _on, and maybe is_active), that should g
wesc wrote:
>
> here's an updated DAL patch to try.
>
> thanks for trudging through this with us!
>
> cfh
>
> On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 3:36:30 PM UTC-8, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>
>> I'm working from Version 2.3.2 (2012-12-17 15:03:30) stable
&g
; web2py.
>
> thanks,
>
> cfh
>
> On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 6:31:52 PM UTC-8, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>
>> With the latest patch, I was able to disable indices on the string fields
>> I wanted to. Unfortunately (for me), I've just about used up my quota,
I have an (admittedly) complex form, which isn't being accepted upon
submission, but form.errors is empty. How would I go about determining the
reason for the rejection?
- Scott
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubs
For historical reasons, I have an appliance which does not use Auth, but
its own table of users. Passwords get stored in a similar way (that is,
using a normal SQLFORM and a password field). How, then, can I verify a
user's password, since I am not using auth & thus do not have (direct)
acces
Is there a way to use a modified version of auth.signature (in my
particular case, adding a custom_qualifier to each field) that doesn't
involve making a Table out of a clone of the set of fields with the desired
modification, but would still be useable as the original is?
Thanks in advance,
Sc
..), )
>
> On Monday, 26 August 2013 20:06:41 UTC-5, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>
>> Is there a way to use a modified version of auth.signature (in my
>> particular case, adding a custom_qualifier to each field) that doesn't
>> involve making a Table
I have added a list:string field to my auth_user table using
auth.settings.extra_fields:
auth.settings.extra_fields['auth_user'] = [
Field('f_dtf', type='list:string', custom_qualifier=dict())
]
The new field shows up fine. But when I try to manipulate that field from
the Profile page,
Bootstrap is included w/ web2py, and the provided scaffolding detects if
you are running in GAE and sets up the DAL accordingly. Which means you
can develop running web2py "natively" and switch to GAE w/o having to
change any code.
The section of the book on deployment recipes goes into more d
Don't know if this helps, but I see that the query for affl uses belongs,
and I'm seeing the following in my GAE log for a query that uses belongs:
File
> "/Users/shunter/Dropbox/webdev/google_app_engine/mypptrials/gluon/dal.py",
> line 4802, in BELONGS
> raise SyntaxError("Not supported"
ed 'belongs' on GAE so long as the set contained
>> 30 or fewer members (by experiment, not documented). I can see how this
>> limited support may have been dropped in a DAL rewrite!
>>
>> On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 9:49:35 PM UTC-4, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>&
tance(second,(list, tuple)):
> raise SyntaxError("Not supported")
> ...
>
> So perhaps you are passing something to belongs which is not a list or
> tuple. It is possible that in the past we did not check.
>
> On Wednesday, 30 October 2013 13:28:05 UT
Did you look in the Logs in the GAE Dashboard for your app? That should at
least give you the trace for the error, so you are not flying completely
blind.
- Scott
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https
Is it possible to use a view to generate a string? In this particular
case, I want to generate a snippet of HTML & cache it away. I suppose this
could be done using straight python & helpers, but a view seems so much
more natural.
- Scott
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.co
As I understand it, the second argument in a menu item (which does not seem
to be documented in the book) indicates if the item is disabled (True) or
not (False). In fact, in the menu generated by the app wizard, this
argument is given an expression comparing the same URL() as used for the
men
As I understand it, Markdown allows for raw HTML to be included, so long as
it is set unindented in its own "paragraph". But when I try the example
from the Markdown spec
(http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#html), it gets escaped.
My view code:
{{extend 'layout.html'}}
> {{fro
I added blank lines before & after the raw HTML; it still got escaped.
On Sunday, November 17, 2013 9:56:08 PM UTC-5, Scott Hunter wrote:
>
> As I understand it, Markdown allows for raw HTML to be included, so long
> as it is set unindented in its own "paragraph". But
The way Markdown is used from WIKI, it prevents the use of raw HTML.
On Sunday, November 17, 2013 10:18:45 PM UTC-5, Scott Hunter wrote:
>
> I added blank lines before & after the raw HTML; it still got escaped.
>
> On Sunday, November 17, 2013 9:56:08 PM UTC-5, Scott Hunter w
Are there any issues with using the various upload-related Field options
when runnning under GAE? In particular, I'm wondering about the
uploadfolder & uploadseparate options. How would using these affect using
response.download in a controller?
- Scott
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
-
The web2py book, under Efficiency Tricks, says:
- Do not put many functions in the same controller but use many
controllers with few functions.
When an appliance is compiled, each of the functions is compiled into its
own .pyc file, the same as would happen if they were in different func
In the latest stable release (2.14.6), the Scheduler menu is empty. When I
looked in widget.py, I see this:
def update_schedulers(self, start=False):
applications_folder = os.path.join(self.options.folder,
'applications')
apps = []
##FIXME - can't start scheduler in
I have an appliance hosted on pythonanywhere which uses the Scheduler
(invoked using a separate web2py process with the -K switch).
This setup in my test environment (OS X at home) works fine, but on
pythonanywhere, the scheduler process generates a stream of errors like:
ERROR:web2py.scheduler
les, letting scheduler recreate them and see what happens.
>
> On Monday, May 30, 2016 at 1:53:04 PM UTC+2, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>
>> I have an appliance hosted on pythonanywhere which uses the Scheduler
>> (invoked using a separate web2py process with the -K switch).
>>
>
The book seems pretty clear about the call to use to start a recurring
task.
What I am not clear on is the best way to invoke this code so that only one
copy of the task is created (assuming the scheduler machinery will handle
making sure that it keeps recurring).
- Scott
--
Resources:
- h
at checks before inserting
> if another instance has been already queued and call that protected
> controller once in a while (i.e. once per day)
>
> On Monday, August 22, 2016 at 3:10:44 AM UTC+2, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>
>> The book seems pretty clear about the call to us
Is there any benefit to putting the code to define the database tables in a
function that has been defined in a module, but gets called from a model,
performance-wise?
- Scott Hunter
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py
I have an app which runs *much* slower than expected on pythonanywhere.
I enabled the profiler, and one thing stood out: on pythonanywhere, the
function the most time was spent in, by far, is fcntl.flock from inside
portalocker while loading the models. In fact, when run locally,
portalocker i
A number of times. What is that supposed to have accomplished?
On Saturday, September 3, 2016 at 3:23:56 PM UTC-4, 黄祥 wrote:
>
> had you already tried to reload pythonanywhere web app?
>
> best regards,
> stifan
>
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http
2016 at 7:01:39 PM UTC+2, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>
>> I have an app which runs *much* slower than expected on pythonanywhere.
>>
>> I enabled the profiler, and one thing stood out: on pythonanywhere, the
>> function the most time was spent in, by far, is fcntl.flock from
I tried putting in your suggested migration settings (and reloaded); it is
still spending about the same amount of time in fcntl.flock.
- Scott
On Sunday, September 4, 2016 at 7:27:08 AM UTC-4, 黄祥 wrote:
>
> for reload i think it's just for reload the configuration of web server
> service (some
I found the problem; migrations weren't being disabled because, while I had
the correct settings in appconfig.ini, they were not being used properly in
creating the db object.
- Scott
On Saturday, September 3, 2016 at 1:01:39 PM UTC-4, Scott Hunter wrote:
>
> I have an app which
Here's a simple controller using an SQLFORM.grid w/ selectable:
def open_requests():
print 'Req: %r' % request.vars
query = ...
form = SQLFORM.grid(query, csv=False, details=False, deletable=False
, editable=False, searchable=False, create=False,
selectable
If I have the controller function return a string if there is a
'records' variable, the second request is not made; however, then it does
not redisplay the form.
On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 9:36:14 AM UTC-4, Scott Hunter wrote:
>
> Here's a simple controller us
I think I understand; seems like something that should be documented, as
well as able to be disabled.
On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 12:37:52 PM UTC-4, Anthony wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 9:36:14 AM UTC-4, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>
>> Here's a sim
3:19:15 PM UTC-4, Anthony wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 1:16:29 PM UTC-4, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>
>> I think I understand; seems like something that should be documented, as
>> well as able to be disabled.
>>
>
> Is it causing a problem fo
When I download & run a fresh copy of the web2py_osx app, I get the usual
warnings about it not being from a known source (b/c it is unsigned, I
presume). In previous versions, when I told the Security System Preference
panel to open it anyway, it did, and all was well. But now, soon after it
Your fields are of type string (the default); so either make string
representations of your lists or declare the fields as lists of strings.
On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 9:15:21 AM UTC-4, Tribo Eila wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> supposed:
> db.define_table('color', Field('blue'),Field('yellow'),Field(
You need single-quotes around
flash.fadeOut("slow")
Otherwise, as you have seen, it gets executed immediately instead of after
a delay.
On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 9:35:30 AM UTC-4, Marc Smith wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm relatively new to JS but the strange quote character at the
> beginning (
:
>
> what would be the counter-arg here ?
>
> On Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 9:42:50 PM UTC+2, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>
>> The web2py book, under Efficiency Tricks, says:
>>
>>
>>- Do not put many functions in the same controller but use many
>>
Am I to interpret from the deafening silence that I am the only one seeing
this problem? Even if that is the case, any ideas how I can resolve it, or
where I might go to find any?
- Scott
On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 12:17:45 PM UTC-4, Scott Hunter wrote:
>
> When I download &
us to me.
- Scott
On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 10:39:41 AM UTC-4, Roberto Perdomo wrote:
>
> I'm using Web2py 2.14.6 in sierra and cannot reproduce your errors.
>
> Can you show the errors or warnings?
>
> El 25 oct. 2016 10:36 AM, "Scott Hunter" > escribió:
&
from
> source
> http://web2py.com/examples/static/web2py_src.zip
>
> If it also fails, it may give more info.
>
> On Tuesday, 25 October 2016 11:55:32 UTC-5, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>
>> Sure, but there's not much to see.
>>
>> When I launch the app (afte
If the oncreate callback for a SQLFORM.grid sets form.errors to true, the
record is not created; similarly, if form.errors. is set to an
error message.
However, shouldn't the form for adding the record return, and in the latter
case, with the specified fields showing their error messages? In m
My bad; I was using concrete (the callback for AFTER a record has been
created) instead of onvalidation (the one for BEFORE that).
On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 11:17:57 PM UTC-5, Scott Hunter wrote:
>
> If the oncreate callback for a SQLFORM.grid sets form.errors to true, the
> reco
I have a SQLFORM.grid in which I would like to use groupby as well as be
able to create records. But when I supply the groupby parameter, the Add
Record button disappears, and can be made to re-appear if the only thing I
change is remove the groupby parameter.
Is this a bug? If it is a featur
When using the basic (as opposed to advanced) search function of an
SQLFORM.grid, it only appears to look in text fields, such that if I enter
a number, it doesn't find any matches unless that number appears in a text
field (even if that field is not one of the ones displayed in the grid).
Is t
27;t be a bad idea to
> at least allow the developer the option of enabling create with groupby. In
> that case, though, we might have to default to create=False for backward
> compatibility.
>
> Feel free to file a Github issue and refer to this thread.
>
> Anthony
&
I'm using a SQLFORM.grid, using a query of the form:
db.t_dog.id.belongs(dog_ids)
But the listing is erratic; some records only appear when the list is
sorted certain ways (except for the last page); entries on each page are in
order, but entries between pages overlap.
I thought the prob
By using orederby you should see your problem go
> away except if you really had found an issue that would be implementation
> specific as you seems to point us in that direction. You can orderby over
> table id if you have not special requirement on that matter.
>
> Richar
by web2py (check
> db._timings, which you can view via response.toolbar()) as well as the SQL
> you are running.
>
> Anthony
>
> On Sunday, December 11, 2016 at 11:49:53 PM UTC-5, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>
>> I'm using a SQLFORM.grid, using a query of the form:
>&
I have 2 appliances on a pythonanywhere web app, one a clone of the other,
both with a Stripe payment page. One of them works, the other does not;
when the form gets submitted, the one that fails shows the following on the
browser console:
[Error] Failed to load resource: the server respon
664,1689,1690,667,1692,1694,1696,673,1698,1700,1706,683,685,691,692,694,649,698,699,578,651,580,585,587,588,589,1686,1422,598,603,606,607,610,613,615,618,659,634,635,638))
ORDER BY t_dog.f_Dog_ID, t_dog.id LIMIT 20 OFFSET 0;
On Monday, December 12, 2016 at 9:00:09 PM UTC-5, Anthony wrote
(i.e., args that are not related to the grid itself), but you don't appear
> to be using any request.args elsewhere in your code. In any case, even if
> you do have some args to preserve, you would not want to include all of
> request.args, because when a grid link is clicked, that will
12, 2016 at 6:04:24 PM UTC-8, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>
>> I have 2 appliances on a pythonanywhere web app, one a clone of the
>> other, both with a Stripe payment page. One of them works, the other does
>> not; when the form gets submitted, the one that fails shows
The problem was with appconfig.ini; I had moved the Stripe tokens into it,
but left them surrounded by quotes.
On Monday, December 12, 2016 at 9:04:24 PM UTC-5, Scott Hunter wrote:
>
> I have 2 appliances on a pythonanywhere web app, one a clone of the other,
> both with a Stripe pay
On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 11:57:48 AM UTC-5, Anthony wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 3:11:42 AM UTC-5, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>
>> The first 20 records appear in the same order in each case (using
>> DBBrowser). How does that help?
>>
>
> T
If I make a fresh, new app from the Administrative Interface, and replace
the contents of default.py with the following, it will print the first 20
records that should show up in the grid, first without using limityby (and
using a counter to stop at 20), and then with limityby; the second is
mi
rintouts as well as
>> the first page of the grid (after sorting on Myfield2) all have the same 20
>> records when I run it. Maybe someone else can try it on OSX. What happens
>> if you run the OSX binary version of web2py?
>>
>> Anthony
>>
>> On
On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 6:43:57 PM UTC-5, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>
>> If I make a fresh, new app from the Administrative Interface, and replace
>> the contents of default.py with the following, it will print the first 20
>> records that should show up in the grid,
Dec 14, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Scott Hunter > wrote:
>
>> I have just tried it on a different OS X machine (but same version of the
>> OS), and did not see the problem. And I didn't see it on pythonanywhere,
>> so I guess it is just that one machine.
>>
>> - Sco
r 23, 2013 11:24:31 AM UTC-8, Niphlod wrote:
>>
>> If I'm not mistaken, GAE filesystem is not writable your only option
>> is to store the file into the database
>>
>> On Saturday, November 23, 2013 1:36:43 PM UTC+1, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>>
>>> A
This looks terrific -- I was able to pack a site I had built locally, load
it up to PA, and it ALMOST all worked.
I have uploaded images, whose URLS are all of the form /download/filename,
where filename is the name of a file in the uploads folder (which I could
verify from PA's dashboard), non
I have a site which, after upgrading to 2.8.2 (and clearing out the
sessions), when I try update a record via a smartgrid or via admin, I get
the error in the title. I tried the same action on the copy of the site I
had made just before upgrading, without any problems.
--
Resources:
- http://
figure out what is wrong
>
> Paolo
>
> On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 3:26:32 AM UTC+1, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>
>> I have a site which, after upgrading to 2.8.2 (and clearing out the
>> sessions), when I try update a record via a smartgrid or via admin, I get
>> the e
PTY_OR around what the manual says is the
default validator.
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 3:30:56 PM UTC-5, Vch H wrote:
>
> I have this problem too.
> Where I should specified validators?
>
> On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 6:00:43 PM UTC+2, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>
>
Is there a way to have a link go to a controller function that uses a smart
grid, but instead of going to the top-level list view, goes directly to a
record to be edited? It looks like when going to such a page from the
smart grid's list, it includes a signature which, if left out, causes a
"n
I'm trying to use the cpdb.py script to copy one sqlite db to another. It
makes the tables & exports the old data to its own satisfaction, but when
it tries to import the data, I get:
EXCEPTION: could not make a copy of the database
foreign key constraint failed
I had run into a similar proble
Note that, when I tried to use the script to copy to a MySQL DB on
pythonanywhere, I got a 150 error, that it couldn't create an auth table,
and this may be related to foreign keys as well.
- Scott
On Sunday, December 22, 2013 3:36:47 PM UTC-5, Scott Hunter wrote:
>
> I'm t
I modified the script to compute a "safe" order (so no table is created
before any that it references), although it looks like the original order
is fine.
But when it tries to define the first table (auth_cas, which has no
references), I get:
(1005, "Can't create table xxx.auth_cas' (errno: 15
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
