On Tuesday, March 31, 2015 at 1:48:02 PM UTC-7, Jim S wrote:
>
> Something went wrong :-(
>
I get the same screen at the moment, from Southern California.
FWIW, I have a site monitored by Uptime Robot; I got a notification in
January, for an outage of an hour-and-a-half.
http://www.uptimerobot
http://www.web2py.com/ this is Ok!
Ovidio Marinho Falcao Neto
ITJP.NET.BR
ovidio...@gmail.com
itjp.net...@gmail.com
Brasil
2014-08-05 18:12 GMT-03:00 Jim S :
> Back up now. Thanks to the pythonanywhere team for t
Back up now. Thanks to the pythonanywhere team for their quick response!
-Jim
On Tuesday, August 5, 2014 4:00:29 PM UTC-5, Jim S wrote:
>
> I've sent a note to pythonanywhere to let them know...
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2
it is back
On Friday, 18 May 2012 03:00:00 UTC-5, encompass wrote:
>
> Darn. When I needed it most. :(
> BR,
> Jason
>
VPS.NET informed me they had a bad switch and needed to replace it.
On Jan 27, 1:07 pm, Ovidio Marinho wrote:
> On Now
>
> Ovidio Marinho Falcao Neto
> Web Developer
> ovidio...@gmail.com
> ovidiomari...@itjp.net.br
> ITJP - itjp.net.
>
> Oh you work for WebFaction? That explains why you like them ;) lol
I am not working for webfaction, I just cited from the link I gave you
Yeah I second Linode, I have tried webfaction for ethicaldeal.com however I
> wasn't very happy considering they hike their prices fast always saying you
BTW when every you buy linode just open a ticket to them and they will
convert your 50Mb port speed to 100Mb for free :)
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Alvaro Lizama Molina wrote:
> linode is a good options :) +1
>
>
> 2012/1/23 Bruce Wade
>
>> Yeah I second Linode, I have tried webfaction for
linode is a good options :) +1
2012/1/23 Bruce Wade
> Yeah I second Linode, I have tried webfaction for ethicaldeal.com however
> I wasn't very happy considering they hike their prices fast always saying
> you are consuming more memory and need to upgrade. You don't have that
> problem with Lino
Yeah I second Linode, I have tried webfaction for ethicaldeal.com however I
wasn't very happy considering they hike their prices fast always saying you
are consuming more memory and need to upgrade. You don't have that problem
with Linode which we are using for youadworld.com.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012
In last 2 years i have tried many VPS companies and trust me found linode
the best, service as well as customer support.
You guys can trust me because i dont work for them :).
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Bruce Wade wrote:
> Oh you work for WebFaction? That explains why you like them ;) lol
Oh you work for WebFaction? That explains why you like them ;) lol
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Vasile Ermicioi wrote:
> http://docs.webfaction.com/user-guide/overview.html
> WebFaction performs daily backups of all your data and stores those
> backups for ten days. You will be able to conta
http://docs.webfaction.com/user-guide/overview.html
WebFaction performs daily backups of all your data and stores those backups
for ten days. You will be able to contact our support team to recover your
data as soon as you need it.
Linode has a fantastic backup system. you can look it up on
http://www.linode.com/faq.cfm.
Also they provide node balancer if you have to much of traffic for just
20$'s.
-Qasim
On Jan 23, 2012 8:48 AM, "Massimo Di Pierro"
wrote:
> How do they handle backup. That is the one think that sold me t
Linode does the same but cost a little more.
On Jan 22, 2012 7:48 PM, "Massimo Di Pierro"
wrote:
> How do they handle backup. That is the one think that sold me to
> VPS.net. They do daily, weakly and monthly backup of the entire
> server. that takes some of my worries away.
>
> On Jan 22, 8:45
How do they handle backup. That is the one think that sold me to
VPS.net. They do daily, weakly and monthly backup of the entire
server. that takes some of my worries away.
On Jan 22, 8:45 pm, Vasile Ermicioi wrote:
> hi,
> I just want to recommend webfaction and uwsgi again, even for hosting
> w
These ddos were 15GB per second webfaction doesn't handle that.
On Jan 22, 2012 6:45 PM, "Vasile Ermicioi" wrote:
> hi,
> I just want to recommend webfaction and uwsgi again, even for hosting
> web2py.com :)
>
> uwsgi is of version 1.0.21, and from version 1, uwsgi is optimized for low
> resource
hi,
I just want to recommend webfaction and uwsgi again, even for hosting
web2py.com :)
uwsgi is of version 1.0.21, and from version 1, uwsgi is optimized for low
resources systems as WAS webfaction
WAS, now webfaction increased RAM from 80Mb to 256 Mb (app RAM),
also offers 100Gb space, 600Gb tra
We have been using linode for 3 months now good service the only problem we
had was with the large bbos attack that was hitting there cali data center.
We ended up getting attacked also. Other then that have had a good
experience with them.
On Jan 22, 2012 4:35 PM, "qasimak...@gmail.com"
wrote:
>
I have been using linode.com for over a year now and they are very
reliable. Not a single reboot or shutdown. And their customer service is
also good.
On Jan 23, 2012 5:30 AM, "villas" wrote:
> I use vps.net and have recently been disappointed with their reliability.
> So much so that I have dec
I am using Linode for more than one year and Linode is amazing!
http://www.linode.com/?r=3f383df8639c367bfc73419d6c1ebfbd8dc11cf7
--
Bruno Rocha
[http://rochacbruno.com.br]
I use vps.net and have recently been disappointed with their reliability.
So much so that I have decided that it is time for a change.
I have been doing some tests with linode.com for a few weeks and have been
pleased, so I am moving sites to them.
Regards,
David
I do not know what is going on. It is not a software issue.
It happened twice that that the VPS was shut down and I had to turn it
on again.
Let week there was a problem that the vps.net DNS servers were down
for about a day.
Massimo
On Jan 22, 2:50 pm, Justin Heath wrote:
> It's been down for
It's been down for me since yesterday.
I start receiving time-outs after this hop:
10 ip65-46-63-46.z63-46-65.customer.algx.net (65.46.63.46) 104.814
ms 104.535 ms 104.382 ms
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Marek Mollin wrote:
> I second
>
> On 22 Sty, 21:34, steve van christie
> wrote:
>
why web2py.com Down.
Ovidio Marinho Falcao Neto
Web Developer
ovidio...@gmail.com
ovidiomari...@itjp.net.br
ITJP - itjp.net.br
83 8826 9088 - Oi
83 9334 0266 - Claro
Brasil
I second
On 22 Sty, 21:34, steve van christie
wrote:
> same in here
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Bruno Rocha wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Anthony wrote:
>
> >>http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/web2py.com:
>
> >> It's not just you!http://web2py.comlooks
Because I was in a hurry and had limited connectivity I did restore a
september 4 backup. (which is good because I never tried a VPS.net
restore and I am glad worked out of the box). So I do not have the
logs of the last few days. I run thin on ram and that may be the
problem.
I will try get more
On Sep 11, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Phyo Arkar wrote:
> was it coz bossie award , too many hits flooded and downed?
I'd guess that it's up to us to make use of the Bossie to drive traffic to the
site. I wonder how many potential users read InfoWorld?
The biggest utility of the award is that it helps
confirmed , its back yay!
was it coz bossie award , too many hits flooded and downed?
On 9/12/11, Valter Foresto wrote:
> http://www.web2py.com/ is up and running.
http://www.web2py.com/ is up and running.
Yes. New data point... the host is now "running a task". Not sure if
the restore or the restart...
On Sep 11, 10:45 am, Phyo Arkar wrote:
> what hosting You use? VPS ?
>
> On 9/11/11, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Yes it is down. I am trying to restart but the console form the host
what hosting You use? VPS ?
On 9/11/11, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
> Yes it is down. I am trying to restart but the console form the host
> does not allow me to. It allowed me to shut it down but not to reboot.
> I tried restore an image and I get the same issue. It seems a problem
> is with the da
Yes it is down. I am trying to restart but the console form the host
does not allow me to. It allowed me to shut it down but not to reboot.
I tried restore an image and I get the same issue. It seems a problem
is with the datacenter. I am out of town today so I cannot check very
frequently. I trust
AOK. Back again.
On Dec 21, 11:48 am, Martín Mulone wrote:
> Work for me. No slowness here.
>
> 2010/12/21 LightDot :
>
> > Works for me. Tried from locations in USA (Texas), Slovenia and Serbia...
> > Yes, the site responds a bit slower than usual.
>
> > Traceroute looks ok. Let me know if you n
Work for me. No slowness here.
2010/12/21 LightDot :
> Works for me. Tried from locations in USA (Texas), Slovenia and Serbia...
> Yes, the site responds a bit slower than usual.
>
> Traceroute looks ok. Let me know if you need any connectivity/speed tests
> done... I tried downloading web2py rele
Works for me. Tried from locations in USA (Texas), Slovenia and Serbia...
Yes, the site responds a bit slower than usual.
Traceroute looks ok. Let me know if you need any connectivity/speed tests
done... I tried downloading web2py release and just about maxed out the 10
mbit line here. I can tr
It is not down but somehow it is incredibly show. The problem is not
with the server but looks more like a bandwidth problem. Let's way
today and see if it is temporary.
Massimo
On Dec 21, 10:22 am, Bruno Rocha wrote:
> Yep, same here. Nor .com or .org something happen on the server.
>
> may be
http://wasitup.com/
--
Thadeus
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Bruno Rocha wrote:
> Yep, same here. Nor .com or .org something happen on the server.
>
> may be we need an HA mirror.the examples app running on GAE could be a
> second choice when main server goes down.
> (http://web2pysite.
Yep, same here. Nor .com or .org something happen on the server.
may be we need an HA mirror.the examples app running on GAE could be a
second choice when main server goes down.
(http://web2pysite.appspot.com/examples/default/index) if there is a way to
keep it updated and a default route when se
Same here.
On Dec 21, 11:14 am, weheh wrote:
> tried accessing it right now but no response
Massimo, any luck?
On Mar 11, 8:23 pm, Alex Fanjul wrote:
> Massimo might you share your blocking/firewall script with us? I was
> precisely hardening my VPS. Are you using it in VPS?
> Thanks
> Alex
>
> El 11/03/2010 18:15, mdipierro escribi :
>
>
>
> > just changing subject title...
> > ... whi
Have you tried: psad --Flush
On Mar 12, 7:15 am, mdipierro wrote:
> The main problem is the with examples/global/vars and book/default/
> docstring
> They generate dynamically links to docstrings recursively. Web spider
> get stuck there and keep requesting pages over pages, thus consuming
> lots
The main problem is the with examples/global/vars and book/default/
docstring
They generate dynamically links to docstrings recursively. Web spider
get stuck there and keep requesting pages over pages, thus consuming
lots of memory and bandwidth. Humans do not do that. Humans would not
more than 2-
Sounds like your new setup is working really well Massimo. Eventually
I will be bugging you for some details as well.
Congrats!
On Mar 11, 8:37 pm, "mr.freeze" wrote:
> Massimo has a script that blocks IPs of things it interprets as denial
> of service attacks, including crawling content without
Massimo has a script that blocks IPs of things it interprets as denial
of service attacks, including crawling content without obeying
robots.txt. I am building an experimental search engine at work and
accidentally bypassed robots.txt on one of the debug runs. I've been
blocked ever since. Works f
Massimo might you share your blocking/firewall script with us? I was
precisely hardening my VPS. Are you using it in VPS?
Thanks
Alex
El 11/03/2010 18:15, mdipierro escribió:
just changing subject title...
... while I look on firewall settings.
On Mar 11, 9:17 am, "mr.freeze" wrote:
I co
just changing subject title...
... while I look on firewall settings.
On Mar 11, 9:17 am, "mr.freeze" wrote:
> I confirmed with our network admin that it is not being blocked
> outbound here.
>
> On Mar 9, 9:24 am, mdipierro wrote:
>
> > I thought I did fix that and I added you to the whitelist.
I confirmed with our network admin that it is not being blocked
outbound here.
On Mar 9, 9:24 am, mdipierro wrote:
> I thought I did fix that and I added you to the whitelist. I will take
> a second look.
>
> Massimo
>
> On Mar 9, 9:10 am, "mr.freeze" wrote:
>
> > Massimo, my IP is still blocked
I thought I did fix that and I added you to the whitelist. I will take
a second look.
Massimo
On Mar 9, 9:10 am, "mr.freeze" wrote:
> Massimo, my IP is still blocked too. You should have it in email with
> the iptables command to whitelist it :)
>
> On Mar 9, 9:07 am, mdipierro wrote:
>
> > It
Massimo, my IP is still blocked too. You should have it in email with
the iptables command to whitelist it :)
On Mar 9, 9:07 am, mdipierro wrote:
> It not down but I may be blocking your IP.
> I have a script that blocks lot of IP if it thinks there is a denial
> of service attack of a directory
It not down but I may be blocking your IP.
I have a script that blocks lot of IP if it thinks there is a denial
of service attack of a directory traversal attack.
What is your ip?
Massimo
On Mar 9, 2:18 am, Sky wrote:
> as I see web2py.com is down since 2 days ago.
> is there any body to inform
Also is working for me...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit t
I see web2py.com responding nicely... maybe something is blocking it
for you?
have a try at http://68.169.39.35/
Or try nslookup on web2py.com to see if your DNS server returns
something valid.
On Mar 9, 2:18 am, Sky wrote:
> as I see web2py.com is down since 2 days ago.
> is there any body t
52 matches
Mail list logo
