[web2py] Re: web2py Turnkey Linux Appliance (collaborator needed)

2011-01-27 Thread ghoulmann
I've gotten feedback from one person, but could use some more. If anyone has a chance, please check out the ISO (preferably) or virtual appliances derived from the TKLpatch; they're available at http://9while9.com. I appreciate the time you may commit to testing this. Much appreciated, Rik Goldman

[web2py] Re: web2py Turnkey Linux Appliance (collaborator needed)

2011-01-06 Thread ghoulmann
I completed and submitted the patch to create a web2py/postgres/apache appliance from TurnKey Linux's LAPP 11.0 (Lucid). The post the the general forum at TKL, with the patch attached, is at http://www.turnkeylinux.org/forum/general/20110107/tklpatch-web2py-framework. At http://9while9.com, I've po

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py Turnkey Linux Appliance (collaborator needed)

2010-12-31 Thread Jonathan Lundell
On Dec 30, 2010, at 10:47 PM, Christopher Steel wrote: > > you could "become" the www-data user with > su www-data > change to /home/www-data/web2py > and then run the commands: > > python -c "from gluon.widget import console; console();" > > and > > python -c "from gluon.main import save_passw

[web2py] Re: web2py Turnkey Linux Appliance (collaborator needed)

2010-12-31 Thread pbreit
Does anyone here use Fabric? I'm going to take a look in the next few days.

[web2py] Re: web2py Turnkey Linux Appliance (collaborator needed)

2010-12-31 Thread ghoulmann
Thanks Chris, I've got the patch worked out for the most part. (incidentally to patching eden). Just incorporating Massimo's suggestions and blueprint, then getting together the first run script to set the password are my remaining concerns. On Dec 31, 1:47 am, Christopher Steel wrote: > Hi Rik,

[web2py] Re: web2py Turnkey Linux Appliance (collaborator needed)

2010-12-30 Thread Christopher Steel
Hi Rik, Turnkey looks interesting... You can get a working Web2py / Turnkey system up and running fairly quickly using the "vanilla" Turnkey installation and then running a slightly modified version of the "setup-we2py-ubuntu.sh script on the same system. This will allow you to break down the tas

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py Turnkey Linux Appliance (collaborator needed)

2010-12-30 Thread Jonathan Lundell
On Dec 30, 2010, at 7:19 PM, Niphlod wrote: > > uhm, the more I see http://www.turnkeylinux.org/docs/inithooks the > more I fear that there is required a single script that could be > prepared in a short while, but needs to be updated if > main.save_password changes. I don't see the problem.

[web2py] Re: web2py Turnkey Linux Appliance (collaborator needed)

2010-12-30 Thread Niphlod
uhm, the more I see http://www.turnkeylinux.org/docs/inithooks the more I fear that there is required a single script that could be prepared in a short while, but needs to be updated if main.save_password changes. On Dec 31, 3:45 am, Jonathan Lundell wrote: > On Dec 30, 2010, at 6:32 PM, ghou

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py Turnkey Linux Appliance (collaborator needed)

2010-12-30 Thread Jonathan Lundell
On Dec 30, 2010, at 6:32 PM, ghoulmann wrote: > > Jonathon, Niphlod, Massimo, thank you for taking the time to write. I > think I know much less than I implied in my original post. > > Is the Jonathon and Niphlod produced something I can simply drop into / > usr/lib/inithooks/firstboot.d and expe

[web2py] Re: web2py Turnkey Linux Appliance (collaborator needed)

2010-12-30 Thread ghoulmann
Jonathon, Niphlod, Massimo, thank you for taking the time to write. I think I know much less than I implied in my original post. Is the Jonathon and Niphlod produced something I can simply drop into / usr/lib/inithooks/firstboot.d and expect to ask the user the web2py password? I'm assuming a she

[web2py] Re: web2py Turnkey Linux Appliance (collaborator needed)

2010-12-30 Thread Niphlod
glad to be helpful and give my 2 cents to this community. your helptext is definetely acceptable, in the long run maybe a comment in the code will be more helpful than the "explicit" helpstring of optparse Niphlod On Dec 30, 11:06 pm, Jonathan Lundell wrote: > On Dec 30, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Niphl

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py Turnkey Linux Appliance (collaborator needed)

2010-12-30 Thread Jonathan Lundell
On Dec 30, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Niphlod wrote: > > uhm > virtually very very very draft of Jonathan's concept. That looks about right, perhaps with some minor wording changes: help='exit after saving password' (no sense in confusing the user about file names, and there's really no

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py Turnkey Linux Appliance (collaborator needed)

2010-12-30 Thread Jonathan Lundell
On Dec 30, 2010, at 12:55 PM, Niphlod wrote: > > PS: on line 561 of gluon/main.py of trunk there's a typo: INPORTANT > instead of IMPORTANT Thanks. I have an unrelated patch in the works that affects main.py, so I'll include it unless Massimo gets around to fixing it first.

[web2py] Re: web2py Turnkey Linux Appliance (collaborator needed)

2010-12-30 Thread Niphlod
PS: on line 561 of gluon/main.py of trunk there's a typo: INPORTANT instead of IMPORTANT

[web2py] Re: web2py Turnkey Linux Appliance (collaborator needed)

2010-12-30 Thread Niphlod
uhm virtually very very very draft of Jonathan's concept. in gluon/widget.py , after "if '-A' in sys.argv: k = sys.argv.index('- A')" (line 695, in trunk), add: parser.add_option('', '--exit', action='store_true', dest='fo

[web2py] Re: web2py Turnkey Linux Appliance (collaborator needed)

2010-12-30 Thread mdipierro
This is an important issue. The more people can help Rik with suggestions and testing the better. On Dec 30, 9:36 am, ghoulmann wrote: > I'm collaborating with Massimo to produce a Web2py appliance that will > install a Lucid distro with Web2py fully configured (probably by > patching TurnKey Lin