Good to know. Yet people who run windows for example, they usually
wait for the executable.
On Feb 15, 9:49 am, Thadeus Burgess wrote:
> I test code in trunk with my development, I always pull changes at the
> start of my day.
>
> On the server however... I havn't upgraded those things in forever
I test code in trunk with my development, I always pull changes at the
start of my day.
On the server however... I havn't upgraded those things in forever,
and I won't until I find a version I am happy with :)
-Thadeus
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:33 AM, mdipierro wrote:
> I think the intent w
I think the intent was to follow that already. The only issue is that
sometimes a new feature is added but we want to wait that people test
it until the version number is incremented. People do not really seem
to test code in trunk.
On Feb 15, 8:19 am, Beerc wrote:
> I suggest semantic versioning
I suggest semantic versioning (http://semver.org/).
On febr. 13, 05:02, mdipierro wrote:
> Feel free
> to make a proposal.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubsc
I do not remember what it was but if I said it was fixed it should be
fixed. Are you still having problems?
On Feb 13, 4:09 am, Alexandre Andrade
wrote:
> In 8/Feb/2010 you wrote about the subject "Customizing Auth"
>
> It is combinations of two things:
> 1) a
In 8/Feb/2010 you wrote about the subject "Customizing Auth"
It is combinations of two things:
1) a bug (just fixed in trunk)
2) the example is missing something (I fixed it). Should be:
auth.settings.table_user = db.define_table('auth_user',
Field('first_n
web-to-py(thon)
web-2(.0)-py(thon)
web-(python)2-py(thon)
when/if there will be a web3py 3 will definitively mean python 3.
Right now I am not so excited about python 3. Perhaps a web4py is more
likely although py4web would be a better name.
On Feb 12, 11:10 pm, Wes James wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:02 PM, mdipierro wrote:
> (What would it take to go from 1. to 2.? Presumably less than it would take
> to go from web2py to web3py.)
Maybe you already know, but the 2 in web2py refers to the python major
version
wow... web4py web5py...
When will software stop being about versions and just being about
feature sets and stability!
-Thadeus
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:02 PM, mdipierro wrote:
>
>> Normally we bump because there is a new feature, not
On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:02 PM, mdipierro wrote:
> Normally we bump because there is a new feature, not a bug fix.
> Technically no features was added in 1.75.1 vs 1.74.11 but many new
> features have been added in between 1.74.1 and 1.74.11. All together
> they have been tested and together they jus
Looking at the commit logs here is the following.
Bug fixes.
Reserved SQL keywords checking
Parents and siblings
Can specify port with Firebird
Upgrade an app by unpacking over it
-Thadeus
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2010, at 7:06 PM, mdipierro
Normally we bump because there is a new feature, not a bug fix.
Technically no features was added in 1.75.1 vs 1.74.11 but many new
features have been added in between 1.74.1 and 1.74.11. All together
they have been tested and together they justify a new full version
number. I think they jump shoul
On Feb 12, 2010, at 7:06 PM, mdipierro wrote:
> If this something you sent me? I do not recall anything on the
> subject.
The question is: how did you decide to go from 1.74 to 1.75, instead of bumping
the third field.
>
> On Feb 12, 6:52 pm, Alexandre Andrade
> wrote:
>> If minor fixes, why
If this something you sent me? I do not recall anything on the
subject.
On Feb 12, 6:52 pm, Alexandre Andrade
wrote:
> If minor fixes, why 1.15.1 and not 1.74.12?
>
> Between the fixes, is the one about change/personalize auth tables?
>
> 2010/2/12, mdipierro :
>
> > Please check it out. Minor fi
14 matches
Mail list logo
